add-sub-mul-div

4 ms·

1.
by add-sub-mul-div 6d ago
On the other hand, the proliferation of shovelware Show HNs is a problem. Now that anyone can "create" a project and that project is so much less likely to have any quality or still be active and maintained in 3 months, they'
2.
by add-sub-mul-div 6d ago
Why even be concerned with the prompt, it's an undeveloped thought from someone who doesn't care enough to develop it themself. It's essentially a tweet.
3.
by add-sub-mul-div 6d ago
It won't get the same level of attention, but the question prior to the lapse into Chinese was pretty damning as well. It wasn't a difficult question at all but she didn't understand or answer it correctly until it was asked
4.
by add-sub-mul-div 8d ago
Because (1) you'd be rewarding the entity that originated and normalized the loss of freedom that Google much later adopted, and (2) as Apple restricts more freedoms you'll still be able to enjoy them on Android for a few more yea
5.
by add-sub-mul-div 9d ago
I've never felt a need to completely withdraw from the phone or the internet. If you just get off the 6 biggest sites/networks it goes a long way. The worst stuff/people have been captured by network effects and are quarantin
6.
by add-sub-mul-div 10d ago
If it was me, being forced to read all of Reddit is something I'd consider "suffering."
7.
by add-sub-mul-div 11d ago
I've never been to Texas but it often sounds like the worst kind of gigantic suburb.
8.
by add-sub-mul-div 13d ago
Yes, in the same way that "people" are the problem with gun violence. But that's an empty statement usually used to distract from the fact that we rightfully make laws about how guns can be used.
9.
by add-sub-mul-div 13d ago
The crazy part of this is that LG did not fear flat out admitting they do fingerprint the audio of what you watch. I already knew that, but I can't imagine it's common knowledge yet. How long ago was it that that would have been t
10.
by add-sub-mul-div 14d ago
Okay that kicks the can down the road, but what will we do twenty years from now?
11.
by add-sub-mul-div 15d ago
On the other hand I'm not sure someone else's prompt is even worth my time. It's a half-baked thought they didn't feel like putting their own effort into developing. It's like reading a tweet.
12.
by add-sub-mul-div 16d ago
And they even figured that out before Cambridge Analytica happened.
13.
by add-sub-mul-div 16d ago
Even worse are the qualitative changes. DVRs and skippable commercials were traded for unskippable and hypertargeted ads.
14.
by add-sub-mul-div 17d ago
It will not kill people in a sci-fi type war with its own intention. I wish that conversation would go away. It will kill people by being an efficient tool that can be used by other people to accelerate various avenues of predation and oppr
15.
by add-sub-mul-div 17d ago
The rich were so successful in manipulating people with culture wars like "women shouldn't work" that the people who fell for it still don't realize the real war was them losing the economic standing in which it was viab
16.
by add-sub-mul-div 17d ago
Another way to look at it is that when adults are back in charge, we can trust tech companies will fall in line with them too.
17.
by add-sub-mul-div 18d ago
Only the female part is fascinating to them. Otherwise we'd see more high level dude psychopath scammers in prison.
18.
by add-sub-mul-div 18d ago
It's incredible, how stupid they think we are.
19.
by add-sub-mul-div 18d ago
If that happened would any of that data get tied back to you? If you haven't created any accounts or signed into anything.
20.
by add-sub-mul-div 19d ago
I can't believe people are letting themselves be taken for a ride so shortly after seeing what happened with streaming subscriptions.
21.
by add-sub-mul-div 20d ago
We have better platforms, most people are just too passive to switch. The masses should stay where they are so as not to invade and pollute the newer and better communities with the same problems that inevitably come with high scale.
22.
by add-sub-mul-div 20d ago
It's a split between user expirences that do and don't optimize for rage and culture wars and engagement bait. If there's also a de facto red vs. blue split, it's due to which community gravitates to which model of what
23.
by add-sub-mul-div 20d ago
The hubris that simple code can fix deceptively complex and ambiguous human problems is too baked into the community to separate.
24.
by add-sub-mul-div 20d ago
Nobody who isn't already falling for the "promises" of AI is going to fall for word games like this.
25.
by add-sub-mul-div 21d ago
Maintaining AI code is the new maintaining offshore code. I don't envy software engineers who are far from retirement.
26.
by add-sub-mul-div 21d ago
Stupid ideas is all they have yet they won't even stick with them?
27.
by add-sub-mul-div 21d ago
We could stop thinking of them as walled gardens we're trying to get into and start thinking of them as quarantines for the Eternal September population.
28.
by add-sub-mul-div 21d ago
I thought electing an outsider with theretofore no experience nor interest in governing was supposed to break the system in a good way so as to erase the incumbent problems and rebuild with common sense and integrity.
29.
by add-sub-mul-div 22d ago
There's no reason that one's feelings about AI can't supersede their feelings about open source. We all live with a complex tapestry of values.
30.
by add-sub-mul-div 22d ago
It's clearly part of the AI endgame that conversational AI output will sell an undisclosed promoted slant where possible. The money will not be left on the table. Regulation effectively no longer exists.

More ›