9 ms·
Ask HN: Is anyone still using Dreamweaver?
When I was learning to build websites in 2010 Dreamweaver was the go-to. I remember it thoroughly confused the heck out of me. Anyone here able to use it effectively?
- appleaday1 2y agoI still cant believe what Adobe did with Flash.
- megadata 2y ago[flagged]
- scarface_74 2y agoWhat were they supppise to do with Flash?
- blargthorwars 2y agoMake the Flash plugin not suck, and provide Javascript rendering for HTML clients that couldn't install it.
- ssag2 2y agoI used it yesterday to plot out a deck I'm building. The ability to draw easily, snap to grid, custom rulers, makes it a great design tool. Better than Corel Draw anyway.
- aradox66 2y agoI miss flash
- Apreche 2y agoReally, it’s more about what Apple did with Flash. iOS not supporting it is what killed it.
- kevin_thibedeau 2y agoFlash being a persistent security hole and memory hog is what killed it. Adobe should have gotten their shit together. Apple saved us from the hell of fixed resolution flash apps and dozens of flash ads on a page.
- unsupp0rted 2y agoSteve Jobs talked about this- when asked by the audience why he wasn't supporting Flash, he said the main thing people will be missing out on is banner ads. And he was mostly right.
- Apreche 2y agoThat’s true, but I think the primary reason Apple did not include support for it was that it killed batteries on mobile devices.
- UltraSane 2y agoYou should have seen what VMware did with Flash when they moronically rewrote vCenter client in it. Worst software ever.
- anonzzzies 2y agoDreamweaver confused? It was a drag & drop & point & click web builder; what was confusing about it? There are many similar tools now, free and paid, haven't heard about Dreamweaver in a long while, so while I don't understand the confusing part, I am very curious if anyone is using it still. I do see it is still sold (and maintained?).
- jbs789 2y agoThis is a question. What is your real question? Are you looking to build something now?
- throwaway127482 2y agoEver heard of curiosity?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- hnuser123456 2y agoNobody uses it to build anything professional, it's a cute toy
- jon-wood 2y agoI would hope nobody is using it for anything professional now but it was definitely used back in the day, my first professional development job was for a small agency which used Dreamweaver for everything. I'm not saying that was a good thing, it generated some of the worst code I've ever seen, but it was used.
- PhilipRoman 2y agoIt is always funny to see "professional" code or tools compared with "toys". In reality, it is precisely the "professional", "enterprise" stuff that turns out to be a giant pile of shit (which we rarely get to see from outside). There are professional businesses storing their main database in Excel, while the amateurs obsess over whether Postgres is scalable enough.
- koakuma-chan 2y agoReal professionals use MongoDB because it is web scale.
- nyarlathotep_ 2y agoThere's still lots of Access Databases running critical functions places too.
- pacifika 2y agoI think I used it to build an ie5 for Macintosh compatible Sharepoint theme. Age check if you’re shuddering now.
- bdcravens 2y agoWhile you are correct that few are using it to build "professional" sites, it was never really a toy. Pretty powerful for the time, and even let you integrate with a number of backend technologies, database servers, etc. For today's world, where you need 3000 Javascript packages to display "Hello World", it's not a good fit.
- cactusplant7374 2y agoThere must be a successor, right?
- Bayart 2y agoWebflow ? Squarespace ? I assumed that segment had been occupied by CMS and SaaS companies.
- JTyQZSnP3cQGa8B 2y agoI doubt it's worth it since you can get the same results in a few hours with Tailwind.
- mattront 2y agoPinegrow Web Editor [0] (I’m the author) gets a lot of ex-Dreamweaver users who are looking for a more modern alternative. [0] https://pinegrow.com https://pinegrow.com
- marc_io 2y agoPinegrow is awesome, thanks for keeping it alive.
- marc_io 2y agoThere's an app called Wappler that was developed by the same folks from DMXzone, which was quite well-known for its Dreamweaver add-ons at the time. It's the closer you will find of a direct successor.
- BoredPositron 2y agoI am volunteering in a school library and someone „built“ their system with Dreamweaver and FileMaker. It’s still in use on an airgapped winxp machine.
- throwaway743 2y agoNotepad was even better than dreamweaver. Never touched it and was taught to stay away.
- jamesgreenleaf 2y agoPeople keep telling me to use Dreamweaver but I stick with what works: FrontPage 98
- kurthr 2y agoOh man, I'm gonna have to upgrade my AOLPress from 1.2.2 to 2.0!
- smitelli 2y agoMicrosoft Word's "Save as Web Page" or GTFO.
- trinix912 2y agoThat's ironically still the easiest way to go for HTML emails as the output is almost guaranteed to display well across various email clients that don't implement CSS properly (Outlook).
- fredoralive 2y agoIIRC Outlook[1] just uses the Word engine internally, so it's going to share the same quirks. (I also seem to remember that Internet Explorer's Trident engine started as a fork from Word, although that's presumably a bit less direct in the later versions). [1] At least proper desktop Win32 Outlook, not the dozens of other things Microsoft have called Outlook.
- riskneutral 2y ago> email clients that don't implement CSS properly (Outlook). Can anyone explain how this is even possible? It's 2025.
- fourthark 2y agoNot the answer you were looking for, but `juice` makes it possible. https://github.com/Automattic/juice https://github.com/Automattic/juice
- neom 2y agoI do!!!!!! I love dreamwaver even today, I'm surprised people don't use it, they have done an amazing job keeping it up to date - it's honestly a joy to use. Granted: I'm not a real dev/swe, just a dude who likes to mess around with webtech, still, I think "real devs" would enjoy it too, it's great to use. I learn web on dreamweaver, I would make something on the front end WYSIWYG editor, and then "turn it around" (I called it in my head) and look at the "back of it" (I was a kid) - anyway, tables and frames and dhtml baby!!!! Also: https://s.h4x.club/nOu445qL https://s.h4x.club/nOu445qL :) :)
- don-code 2y agoI did the same, except with Netscape Composer. That was a time where the output of the WYSIWYG editor - really, the source of any page - was pretty digestible, even to me as a middle school student. I've noticed recently that the JavaScript debugger in Firefox can "un-Webpack" (and in some cases un-minify, if I've read the inputs and outputs correctly) the code behind many sites. It's certainly not as approachable as declarative HTML, but I suspect to some enterprising person, that route is still open.
- trinix912 2y agoI think it was Microsoft FrontPage that had the most undigestible output at the time. A mess of tables, inline styles, Internet Explorer-specific tricks, plus a reliance on FrontPage Server Extensions for full functionality. Adobe still had GoLive at the time, which was basically what Dreamweaver is now, and it didn't mangle the output as much, neither did Netscape Composer (which was way more limited). Many of the simpler WYSIWYG editors (Netscape Composer, that thing AOL had, etc.) were not nearly as bad as FrontPage.
- jszymborski 2y agoFrontPage is what I made my first sites on as a child. That was such a fun experience.
- agumonkey 2y agoI forgot if FrontPage had the automatic FTP upload or if it's a fantasy in my mind.
- pupppet 2y agoI stopped using it ages ago but I still use its HTML code colour scheme into whatever code editor I use, nothing else feels right.
- lewdwig 2y agoI think the emerging meta seems to be using LLMs that will create HTML components for you from your Figma storyboards. And also to let another LLM create your Figma storyboards from your novel design ideas. And asking a third LLM to give you some novel design ideas.
- canadiantim 2y agoYep this does seem to be the emerging meta. Have you found success with some models over others?
- pockybum522 2y agoI'm not sure they were being serious.
- neither_color 2y agoOne prompt to generate 75% of what you want and get you excited and fill you with a sense of dread over what it means for future tech careers. 10 prompts to add a new feature. 20 prompts to add a second feature and fix everything that broke in the 1st feature while adding the second. 50 prompts to add a third feature and fix what broke in the 1st and 2nd features while adding the third.
- LaGrange 2y agoOne for the Dark Lord on his Dark Throne, In the damp bedroom where the doges lie, One Prompt to rule them all, One prompt to find them, One Prompt to bring them all and in the darkness bind them, In the damp bedroom where the black molds lie. Edit: don't judge me I'm not a poet.
- aruggirello 2y agoYou forgot a fourth LLM will be the one using the site.
- deadbabe 2y ago
- markx2 2y agoI probably tried to use a pirated version of Dreamweaver. But I loved HomeSite. https://nick.typepad.com/blog/2009/06/homesite-discontinued.html https://nick.typepad.com/blog/2009/06/homesite-discontinued....
- bdcravens 2y agoHomesite was the first editor I used extensively for web development (after trying some of the other options like HotDog Pro, etc). It was small enough, and simple enough, that you could run it directly from a 1.44mb floppy. (I was poor in college and relied on computer labs) Later went on to use Allaire's ColdFusion Studio, which was a superset of Homesite, for several years.
- Dachande663 2y agoI loved dreamweaver when starting out. Never got on with the WYSIWYG (hence moving on), but its ability to read your CSS file and suggest classes was great. MX was the pinnacle in early 2000s. More relevant to me though, I miss Fireworks so much. Nothing comes closer. Figma is great but web based and already shown willing to sell out everyone who trusts them.
- cynicalsecurity 2y agoLunacy is just like Figma but local.
- zer0x4d 2y agoAn ode to Dreamweaver Dreamweaver was how I learned MySQL back when I was 12-13 and got into web development. I don't remember how I came across it but somehow things, the way they were laid out at the time, made sense to me. This would ripple into a career that's making my living 16 years later. I remember downloading XAMPP and installing it to get a local MySQL and PhpMyAdmin server. A few clicks in Dreamweaver later, I somehow had a connection file that would connect to my local MySQL server. I started playing around with it and creating different forms. The MySQL query generators on Dreamweaver were so simple that you could, with a few clicks, have a full on CRM. I ended up coding a test score reporting system for my middle school class and the school somehow trusted me and started using it. This made me possibly the most hated person in the school because parents could now see their kids scores every day and there was no more "Oh the teacher hasn't given out the scores yet." But it was good times, and I was so excited about it. Many years later, I now run a startup and have transitioned into using Node.js but MySQL is still my bread and butter. I still remember that day when I discovered the SELECT query.
- jszymborski 2y agoI loved the XAMPP logo
- evanmoran 2y agoWhen Dreamweaver integrates GPT4o it will finally reach mainstream. I can imagine the podcast ad-spots already. Watch out SquareSpace. Disruption comes for us all. (P.S: I did use Dreamweaver in the early 2000s. It was great. I’m surprised it still is running! RIP Fireworks)
- teej 2y agoNow that's a name I've not heard in a long time. Early 2000s Adobe was stacked with web technology. They knew where the world was headed, but didn't quite capture it the right way. Flash, Shockwave, Dreamweaver, Macromedia Homesite, Fireworks, Coldfusion, Adobe AIR, LiveMotion, Actionscript 3.0, MXML, Flex. They shipped so much software, it's incredible.
- trinix912 2y agoWhat's even more interesting is when you look at some of those tools, many of them were actually way more straightforward to use to design websites without much coding than what we have today. Just like how we had all those CRUD rapid app development tools that would build the app for you just from a database model (Access, PowerBuilder, Delphi, FoxPro...). While what we have today is arguably way more powerful, we've lost some of that simplicity (at least for more trivial use cases) along the way.
- snowwrestler 2y agoMacromedia is really where to point most of that admiration IMO. Most of the products you list were developed there and then Adobe bought the company. Jeremy Allaire somehow flies under the radar as an impactful tech entrepreneur, but look at this resume: Allaire Corp, Macromedia, Brightcove, Circle. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Allaire https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Allaire
- virtualcharles 2y agoI always felt like Adobe‘s big problem was they were fixated on trying to adapt any web technology to work for print designers, that any design should fit in a certain window size or resolution. This worked ok until mobile devices hit a certain tipping point and the idea of responsive design became king. They didn’t know how to handle that, and the tools fell way behind.
- perardi 2y agoI can’t imagine anyone is still using Dreamweaver—that market must have been utterly subsumed by Squarespace. If you are a, say, small business that needs a 3–5 page marketing site with contact info and about pages, surely it makes more sense to use Squarespace (or wix, or what have you). But this sent me down a memory rabbit hole…a former manager of mine loved Brackets. Brackets was Adobe’s open-source text editor (https://opensource.adobe.com/brackets.io/?lang=en https://opensource.adobe.com/brackets.io/?lang=en) that was sorta VSCode, but prettier. Adobe sunsetted that project, but it still apparently somewhat lives on, in the form of Phoenix Code. (https://phcode.dev https://phcode.dev) And it still does look very “designed” in comparison to VSCode. I really like the default typography, tag highlighting, and some of the details of the text editor itself.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- trinix912 2y ago> I can’t imagine anyone is still using Dreamweaver—that market must have been utterly subsumed by Squarespace. If you are a, say, small business that needs a 3–5 page marketing site with contact info and about pages, surely it makes more sense to use Squarespace (or wix, or what have you). You're right, considering that Dreamweaver is SaaS now. Were it a single purchase it would actually be more affordable for independent webmasters making websites as one could buy a single copy of Dreamweaver, make several websites, and host them on a single server with multiple domain names, while not paying the subscription over and over again.
- nightpool 2y agoDoes it? IMO it looks very outdated and cluttered compared to most editors. Clicking around a bit, this screen specifically stood out to me as lacking a lot of visual hierarchy: https://i.imgur.com/Y7iBS2p.png https://i.imgur.com/Y7iBS2p.png. It just kind of reads as a visual jumble with too many elements competing for your attention with slightly different/incoherent styling—I count 5 different unique button styles on this page alone, with some buttons having flat borders, some buttons having shiny highlights, and 3 completely different shades of grey button borders. Definitely doesn't feel "designed" to me.
- cynicalsecurity 2y agoNo, no one is using it. It never was a go-to tool even back then. I feel old by just remembering it. Dreamweaver solved no one's problems. 1) Regular users didn't need it: they couldn't use it for publishing their web-sites anyway. They quickly just switched to social media for publishing their content. 2) Dreamweaver was not a great tool for professionals too. Its code editor was not convenient and overall the program felt really poor in features. It never could catch up with new features of web. Besides, no one creates whole pages and Dreamweaver didn't support dividing a page into parts like header, main part, menu, articles footer etc, as far as I remember. This would be a way too much complicated task to implement. So it was just a tool for students. If you were learning HTML, it was a fine tool to learn it. That's it. It was never used in real work. The name "Dreamweaver" is really cool though, I must give them credit. It sounds even way too cool for such a simple program as it was. It should have been used for an iconic film or a video game instead. Unexpected bottom line: do we need something like Dreamweaver which wouldn't suck? Yes. Figma got so successful because it allowed creating prototypes and was solving real life problems. Now a new program like Dreamweaver could solve the problem of quick prototyping and generating HTML code for something like React components. Would it be a complicated app? Yes. Would it require a lot of programming? Yes. Would it immediately bring money? No. So currently it's probably won't be a good idea to work on it. You can create something like a visual editor module for HTML pages or react components to be used in modern IDEs. Maybe even just by embedding a non-read only WebView with some cleverly butchered developer tools and sell that module to companies for a cheap subscription.
- theseanz 2y ago> It was never used in real work Does this mean I need to return all my paychecks from 2004 to 2007?
- hilbert42 2y ago"Would it be a complicated app? Yes. Would it require a lot of programming? Yes. Would it immediately bring money? No. So currently it's probably won't be a good idea to work on it." Consider that web browsers essentially do the reverse of HTML editors such as Dreamweaver. Moreover, all current web browsers do a much better job at rendering web pages from HTML than do WYSIWYG editors do at turning text into HTML. I don't think many appreciate how sophisticated web browsers are these days. Now consider that browsers such as Firefox and Chromium are open source, their code could be used to develop HTML editors. The question I keep asking is why aren't there a plethora of HTML editors out there that harness the algorithms these browsers already use for their own development. As you suggest, producing a good HTML editor is very hard work, if it weren't then there'd be many good editors out there but there aren't. Take wordprocessors with a 'save as HTML' option and one will find the code they produde ranges from almost unusable to abominable. Same goes for email editors that produce HTML-formatted emails. For example, Thunderbird has about the worst HTML editor around, it's brain-dead and full of bugs, and it's been like that for decades. It's as if those at Mozilla are terrified to touch it for fear that they'll kill it altogether. Now keep in mind that Thunderbird actually uses the Firefox engine so what's going on here? With Thunderbird is the browser code completely divorced from its email editor? OK, you may well say that's just how is it with Thunderbird, the editor evolved separately to its rendering engine. I'll then say take a good look at BlueGriffon which is quite an excellent HTML editor based on Firefox (despite the fact that it's awkward to use and hasn't been updated in ages). How come its developer can produce good HTML whereas Thunderbird's developers don't seem to have a clue? Also, how relevant to this discussion is the fact that BlueGriffon's development has ceased: http://bluegriffon.org/ http://bluegriffon.org/. What's the actual reason for the developer ceasing development (there's likely more than he's stating on his webpage)? Right, perhaps somewhere in all that comment lies the path to actual truth of the matter—that is, how difficult it is to actually make a decent HTML editor? I've been on the lookout for a good open-source HTML editor for years and I've yet to see a decent discussion, analysis or exposé of the subject. Why not? It's still impossible to sort out whether the demand for a decent HTML editor just isn't there or whether it's a too bigger project and not worth the effort. I wish those who are truly in the know would put this matter to rest. Many of us who don't wish to delve deep into web browser/editor code would love some answers.
- nightpool 2y agoI heard recently during the big government purge that a lot of the actual mechanics of that purge functioned by revoking people's Dreamweaver licenses, and that a lot of .gov websites run on Dreamweaver. Probably the US government is singlehandedly keeping Dreamweaver alive through large annual contracts for new features. I don't have any concrete sources on this, it was just Twitter gossip, but it makes a lot of sense to me—Dreamweaver provides the ability for non-technical government employees to edit the site, low system requirements for the servers, and presumably enough Enterprise features to ensure template homogeneity across an org as large as USG.
- barbecue_sauce 2y agoIs it not included as part of the general Adobe subscriptions?
- bdcravens 2y agoIt is. https://www.adobe.com/products/dreamweaver.html https://www.adobe.com/products/dreamweaver.html
- tombert 2y agoI had no idea that you could even still get a copy of Dreamweaver anymore, but a quick search seems to confirm that, indeed, you can still get it. As a teenager I used to use a pirated copy of Dreamweaver, and it was cool but I eventually just learned HTML since I found that the stuff I wrote ended up being better than the stuff being generated by Dreamweaver, and of course that had the advantage of being legal and free. I'm sure that the HTML exporter has gotten a lot better since 2005, but I have moved as far away from web development as I could since then because web development is terrible. A small part of me wants to try the latest Dreamweaver now but I don't have a Windows or Mac computer anymore.
- ssag2 2y agoMacromedia didn't mind the piracy at the time. People learned from pirated versions and then went to work in companies that bought licenses. They bootstrapped the company with that tactic. Same with Flash.
- tombert 2y agoNot trying to make the piracy seem "right" or anything, but I would like to point out that I didn't make any money with the pirated Macromedia software either. I made a couple cartoons that got blammed on Newgrounds, did the examples in the Animator's Survival Kit, and then decided I'm not smart enough to be creative and did software instead.
- ssag2 2y agoI worked with Macromedia at the time and they were all for people pirating their software and actually listened to them talk about seeding their betas to pirates.
- hereonout2 2y agoThis is pretty much my experience too, back then I had a copy of a 1000+ page book called HTML 4 The Complete Reference. With that tome on my desk it honestly didn't take much work to be able to do a better job than Dreamweaver using notepad and writing HTML by hand. I never got into the advanced Dreamweaver features, am sure I remember loads of stuff around managing complete sites with it, etc. But from a purely front end developers perspective it always seemed superfluous.
- elviejo 2y agoI like dreamweaver. But I could still code html by hand with HotDogPro. The one that I really miss is Macromedia Fireworks. The perfect mix between vector editor + html editor + OOP. And to think that it did all of that in the metadata of a binary format (png). Nothing has come close.
- zackangelo 2y agoAllaire Homesite anyone? It was a sad day for me when it got bought and integrated into Dreamweaver.
- samwillis 2y agoIf you hadn't post this comment, I would have. Fireworks could have been Figma, it could have been the default platform every designer used. But Adobe didn't understand it, they saw it as a weird Photoshop competitor and shelved it. The last few versions bundled with CS were clearly neglected maintenance releases. I finally stopped using my slowing rotting copy in about 2014 when I got a Mac with a retina screen and fireworks was stuck with a terrible pixel doubled ui. :-(
- markdown 2y agoI held on until 2020. At some point I had to give up MacOS updates to keep it going. I still haven't found an acceptable replacement, choosing instead to design in-browser with CSS. Of course this means I can't make graphic heavy designs that I can slice and export with transparent PNGs, but we haven't cycled back to that sort of design yet so I'll be OK with minimalist crap for a while.
- gruntledfangler 2y agoSpry assets
- graypegg 2y agoAround the same time, I was using Coda actually! https://web.archive.org/web/20101007013748/http://panic.com/coda/ https://web.archive.org/web/20101007013748/http://panic.com/... I had only used dreamweaver a small amount at highschool, but the imac we had at home had a Coda license on it. While I don't think I could comfortably use Dreamweaver to make something today, Coda is possibly usable. Coda 2 since came out which I never tried, and now it's a new editor called Nova, which I was using for a short while but has strayed away from the style-focused Coda 1.x. I would like to see that class of "make your own website" desktop editors come back, that bridge the line between dreamweaver and IntelliJ. Just a few core IDE features that make it not a pain to use, and just a few GUI features to make designing easy.
- jszymborski 2y agoI always envied Coda users.
- paradox460 2y agoCoda was actually the first thing I ever expensed. I really quite liked that software I keep going back to Nova to see if it will recapture that magic, but it just can't compete with vscode these days
- hereonout2 2y agoWow, I was taught Dreamweaver on a college course in the very early 2000s but I have never really seen it used professionally. In 20+ years of employment I think I came across one developer who used it, and that was probably in 2005 or so! Find it hard to imagine what kind of team would use it for development today.
- ssag2 2y agoI still use it when I have to update my website.
- snowwrestler 2y agoI had to read the question twice. Dreamweaver was the go-to in 2010? I think it was already well on its decline by then. At a new job in 2003 one of my first tasks was to generate new “heat map” code since the company was updating the background image file for 50-state map interfaces. Dreamweaver had the best interface for doing that work, so I got a copy and spent a couple days carefully tracing the 50 state outlines (which Dreamweaver turned into geometric shape code). But even then, most of our sites were running on a database-backed CMS. By 2010 we were building sites in Drupal, Wordpress, and Joomla. I knew folks still maintaining sites with Dreamweaver templates at that time, but they were all legacy sites in academic and government jobs. Most of those types of orgs at the time still thought a website was something you built once and used for decades, like a building.
- lubujackson 2y agoFunny story, I'm a SWE and my wife used to work as a marketing manager. Her boss wanted her to make something similar, a heat map over a U.S. map. Except he wanted it to work in Excel. She asked me about it and I told her I could code something like that, but no way inside Excel... Sure enough, she hacked on it for a while and was able to actually build a functioning heat map in Excel. I have no idea how it works. I've been a dev for 20+ years and that remains one of the more voodoo tech things I've seen!
- becquerel 2y agoExcel is not merely Turing-complete, but a step above, able to achieve dark things best left unsaid.
- anakaine 2y agoSet default zoom on the sheet to very small and map out states by cells - treat them like pixels. So much yuck.
- leptons 2y agoI did this back in the early/mid 1990's. I wrote a program that could convert .gif files to Excel using the cells as pixels. I converted a pic of a supermodel and sent the excel file to my buddies. They were surprised to say the least.
- rambambram 2y agoI think about Dreamweaver once a year, last time I used it was around 2004, I guess. The WYSIWYG way of doing things was an eye opener after using Notepad and manually typing tables from some HTML book. I later switched to PHP, MySQL and CSS, but I miss ActionScript sometimes. I made some cool browser games with it and it sparked an interest for programming on top of designing (try making a car steer correctly in a topdown view when math and stuff is not your strongest point).
- Animats 2y agoYes. I have to run it under Wine on Linux, but my paid-for version of Dreamweaver 8 still works fine.
- netol 2y agoMy dad does. He prefers older versions though (and he switched from FrontPage)
- robotnikman 2y agoDreamweaver, now that's a name I haven't heard in a long time, I remember using it in highschool to build websites during a web design class. I always thought it ended up being discontinued by Adobe and replaced by various web frameworks, but maybe I'm thinking of Microsoft Frontpage
- fakebizprez 2y agoNo, but I actually named my company's flagship software "Laneweaver" (logistics industry) as an homage to what once was a great product. Adobe will probably read this and sue me.
- ata_aman 2y agoWeird quirk I inherited from Dreamweaver: I used a bootlegged/trial version in high school to learn coding and it would close itself every few minutes so I would Ctrl+S every few seconds to save my progress. I still do that to this day even though all my Jetbrains IDEs auto-save. I think I still have my webassist.com PHP extensions for Dreamweaver somewhere on my hard drive from 2008.
- dawnerd 2y agoI got my (professional) start with it but very quickly grew out of it when I got a job working on real websites. But I do have fond memories of its editor. To this day I’m still confused how their built in scripts were supposed to work, especially their auth flow. My first real editor was Netscape Composer.
- nemosaltat 2y agoI was using DreamWeaver in maybe 2006-2007. I hadn’t thought about it in a long while. Back then we were CRUD web apps with a FileMaker backend and there was an integration where you could drag database fields straight out of FMP7 into DreamWeaver and it would automatically create the correct PHP (also 6 or 7 back then) code for your form. I coded up a simple CRUD in Streamlit yesterday (needed a simple way for my Field guys to create professional looking PDF trip reports) but it still took me longer than that workflow used to. Our tooling really seems far behind where it ought to be. The whole time I was writing it, I was thinking why did I stop using PHP for stuff like this?
- jval43 2y agoTools like FileMaker, Dreamweaver and others empowered regular people to do "personal computing" and allowed them to help themselves build the tools they needed. It seems to me like that was a golden age of genuine personal computing that went by too fast and with many avenues left unexplored.
- paradox460 2y agoStanford Sierra Camp and Conference center runs almost entirely on FileMaker, or it did last time I paid attention
- radley 2y agoI use it for FTP and (child) template editing for Wordpress sites.
- Jotalea 2y agoI started making a website on Dreamweaver back in 2020 when I was just starting to learn programming. I think the website is still up: http://acunia.com.ar/leon http://acunia.com.ar/leon
- WillAdams 2y agoDon't look at me, I'm still bummed that Navipress (which later became AOLpress) didn't survive --- though a certain Tim Berners-Lee did use it to write a book about the web: https://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/Weaving/ https://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/Weaving/ Similarly, NVU and Amaya both went away --- is there anything up-to-date which will do web design interactively?
- nabaraz 2y agoNot dreamweaver, But I use Flash (Macromedia) on Windows and Adobe on Mac frequently. Call it muscle memory, I find it easier to cook a chart, shape and basic resize/crop on Flash.
- someothherguyy 2y agoI am still on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HoTMetaL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HoTMetaL
- nwh5jg56df 2y agoCursor is the new Dreamweaver
- BinaryMachine 2y agoNot me, I wish I could take back my college $ on courses that used extensive Dreamweaver and Flash. I guess we can't predict the future.
- graiz 2y agoWhat a strange post. Anyone using Frontpage or Mosaic?
- wonger_ 2y agoI have a friend that's been using Dreamweaver for decades. He still maintains a handful of client sites with it.
- nepger21 2y agoThis brings back memory. Definitely a go-to at that time and nothing better. A different era.
- rchaud 2y agoThe last time I used Dreamweaver was in 2009 when I was putting together a site at a small business, my first job after college in a recession-hit market. These days I know HTML/CSS pretty well, but do still use a DW-style tool to build simple websites without an IDE: Bootstrap Studio[0]. with a customizable barebones Bootstrap grid system under the hood. It's pretty powerful, GUI-based flexbox positioning, custom code support, split code/design view, SFTP upload built-in. I've used it to export an HTML design to flat files, and edit them in an IDE to hook it up to CMS logic, so there isn't any app lock-in or spaghetti code. A new feature I really like is the "blog" function, where you can assign a folder to be the "blog", and the app will build an index page containing all those entries upon hitting "publish". The final export is all static HTML and CSS, so it's a way to upload to places like Amazon S3 and Neocities without the need for an underlying server-side blog platform. [0] https://bootstrapstudio.io/ https://bootstrapstudio.io/
- bdhcuidbebe 2y agoI remember unmessing webpage layout from the dreamweaver generated html by hand so it could be templated for the actual website on my first job. Never again!
- superfunny 2y agoDreamweaver? Who remembers Drumbeat 2000?
- fuzztester 2y agoI vaguely remember HoTMetaL Pro or something like that, by, maybe, SoftQuad? a sales guy in a company where I worked long back, was making a quotation for it, or something like that. update: i googled to check it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SoftQuad_Software https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SoftQuad_Software james clark is mentioned there as one of their notable employees. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Clark_(programmer) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Clark_(programmer)
- someothherguyy 2y agoHad a relative that was a web developer, and I was using hotmetal in 5th grade, self-teaching myself how to write html and publishing things to AngelFire. Those were the days. Thanks SoftQuad.
- mentalpiracy 2y agoI remember feeling like a power user upgrading from Frontpage 98 to Dreamweaver and being able to hot swap between code and the live view. Dreamweaver rolled a ton of then-groundbreaking features into a great interface.
- TECHBEAST2k 2y agoI actually still use DW when I want to convert a giant spreadsheet into a table easily.
- stevesunderland 2y agoI still open Dreamweaver to use its advanced find/replace tool[1]. You can create complex conditions (eg. "find all a tags with class button and change the tag to button") which is super helpful when refactoring code or converting stuff. I keep thinking about making VSCode extension that has the same capabilities. [1] https://helpx.adobe.com/dreamweaver/using/find-replace-text.html https://helpx.adobe.com/dreamweaver/using/find-replace-text....
- xnx 2y agoYes! The search and replace capabilities were amazing. Haven't had the need to do that in a long time.
- tomaytotomato 2y agoAh the good ol' days of Dreamweaver on my Windows XP machine + WinAmp + Custom XP skinz + Gamespy + Hamachi + Xbox Connect + Notepad++ + Filezilla + Hosting sites on dot.tk or 000webhost for my Xbox clan
- marshughes 2y agoHaha, Dreamweaver is really quite a character. I was also tossed around by it at first. But later I found that mastering its shortcuts was like opening a whole new world. Have you ever tried to dig out these little tricks?
- textlapse 2y agoWhile y’all are here… What’s the best website builder out there? Something that you can deploy as raw html/js/css on a domain/site you own and operate? Something like Squarespace/wix etc but where you edit locally and own the content… (these and official WP afaik don’t allow this)
- arrty88 2y agoMy uncle probably
- blackeyeblitzar 2y agoI would love to see something like Flash come back. HTML5 isn’t the same thing, and killing flash seems like it was a coup for Apple’s App Store and Google’s control of browsers more than anything.
- treesknees 2y agoI hardly see it mentioned in these types of threads but I started making my first websites with Microsoft Publisher. It was essentially geared toward people who were used to creating newsletters and posters/fliers. It came with our copy of Microsoft Office 98 and it was a lot of fun to play with as a kid.
- aqueueaqueue 2y agoWhat the original SSG? Not anymore but it was great for its time.
- Brajeshwar 2y agoI started with Dreamweaver in 2001/2002.[1] In between, I used Utradev for a while. However, I gave up Dreamweaver soon enough for TextPad as I used to write a lot more ActionScript; one editor for all was easier for me - so, HTML, CSS and JavaScript all in TextPad. Then, I used a combination of Coda and BBEdit for a while. I remember writing the Sass.Mode for Coda, which was later taken over by Panic and included as part of Coda 2.[2] Edit: Now I remember why the change. I moved to a Mac ecosystem from Windows in 2006. By then, I had already moved on to Sublime Text around 2008/2009/2010. I don’t code much these days, but Sublime Text is still my go-to for its speed and the ability to open large codebases or an entire drive and let me edit things around. Dreamweaver was a good dream. I’m going to spend the next 10-20 years learning Vim slowly and making it my retirement IDE. 1. https://brajeshwar.com/2002/dmx-inc-files/ https://brajeshwar.com/2002/dmx-inc-files/ 2. https://brajeshwar.com/2012/coda-2-comes-built-in-with-sass-mode/ https://brajeshwar.com/2012/coda-2-comes-built-in-with-sass-...
- freedomben 2y agoI miss AOL Press! It was really phenomenal software. In a related not I still can't believe putting tags in ALL CAPS didn't win the style war.
- scrapcode 2y agoAh, the nostalgia. Dreamweaver was pivotal for me in my early teens to be able to copy other sites code to see how things were built out and learn HTML + CSS. If I remember correctly, it was really the only way to go to make image maps when those were a thing.
- giardini 2y agoAFAIK Dreamweaver generated classic ASP code. And while Microsoft continues to downplay it, classic ASP code still runs on Microsoft IIS: https://www.geoplugin.com/resources/classic-asp/#History_and_Current_Status_of_Classic_ASP https://www.geoplugin.com/resources/classic-asp/#History_and... I guess they worked out all the bugs!8-))
- kypro 2y agoI learnt to code in the mid-to-late 00s so have very fond memories of Dreamweaver given a lot my first web projects were heavily reliant on it. I also used it in college around that time. I moved away from it pretty quickly because I stopped using the visual designer in favour of HTML and also started writing PHP so as an IDE it wasn't ideal. To be honest I'm kind of surprised anyone is still using it... There's a lot of great web WYSIWYG editors out there now and most websites people might want to build can be more quickly and more professionally be built on the back of services like Shopify. I'd do anything to go back to those days building silly websites with Dreamweaver though. The web was so exciting back then. A lot of the content online really was just people sat there computer playing with Dreamweaver and working things out. You don't really get that anymore (apart from a few homemade blogs posts here).
- tv10 2y agoFor JavaScript dev, even the latest version is useless in 2025. But it is a cool novelty and should be protected at all costs. Especially personally considering my mom and dad used it before.
- JimT777 2y agoI have used both Frontpage and Dreamweaver. I currently use the vintage open source html editor Kompozer.