6 ms·
I think its worth mentioning that DDOS protection has become a tool to control online discourse. Once you get kicked off Cloudfare, thats mostly it for you if y
by cf141q5325 3y ago
I think its worth mentioning that DDOS protection has become a tool to control online discourse. Once you get kicked off Cloudfare, thats mostly it for you if you have a determined attacker. Thats quite a beneficial situation for governments.
- Run_DOS_Run 3y agoDon't forget OVH. Their DDoS-protection is included in every server.
- peterhadlaw 3y agoWhat do you mean every server? Pardon my ignorance, first time I am hearing about these folks.
- tw04 3y agoOVH is a hosting provider, you rent physical or virtual servers from them for a monthly fee. They protect their entire network with DDoS mitigation. https://www.ovhcloud.com/en/security/anti-ddos/ddos-attack-mitigation/ https://www.ovhcloud.com/en/security/anti-ddos/ddos-attack-m...
- patrec 3y agoIf cloudflare won't touch you, chances are neither will OVH.
- malikNF 3y agoAt-least in my experience, OVH was the only hosting company where their network engineers spoke to me when we had a ddos problem. Had a situation where one of my servers were getting ddosed we tried multiple providers both cloud and dedicated, but the attack was not getting stopped by anyone, the customer service was useless on most other places its either we get null routed, or hours of back and forth with customer service without any solution. We moved our servers to OVH the customer service rep directed us to an engineer within a few minutes. I remember we had to send a few packet captures during an attack to one of their network engineers and, not only did they block the attack in a few hours, the engineer in charge explained exactly what happened was such a nice learning experience, that one interaction with them will always make me recommend them.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Spivak 3y agoIt really isn't that dire, AWS has Shield (or really just Cloudfront), GPC has Cloud Armor, Azure has "Azure DDoS Protection", everything on Digital Ocean is protected by default. And if you're on-prem or colo then even a modestly sized edge router can handle quite a bit of traffic. And if all you want is the CDN part and not origin protection then every commercial CDN does DDoS protection. If you mean "providing expensive protection services for free on a $5/mo VPC" then sure Cloudflare might be your only bet.
- cf141q5325 3y agoNot a question of money. If i recall, all of these are as easy to reach for governments as cloudfare itself. Especially with the threat of KYC. Would be happy to be wrong here though.
- swores 3y ago"If a government decides they want you offline" is quite a big difference from the original "Once you get kicked off Cloudfare, thats mostly it for you".
- cf141q5325 3y agoInitial post was about controlling public discourse. Thats something where the attackers are governments. Sorry if the wording was misleading.
- anamexis 3y agoHow is DDOS protection the issue then? Isn’t the issue just DDOS?
- cf141q5325 3y agoSomebody else asked this but deleted before i could respond, so i am glad you asked. Centralized DDOS protection and DDOS seem to be two sides of the same coin, so i dont understand what the distinction would entail. edit: You could argue that DDOS is an equal opportunity tool, while the threat of getting kicked off cloudflare is reserved for a selected few. So the difference would be which is more at threat of getting exploited. Hope that helps.
- victorbjorklund 3y agoA bit dramatic right? Sure, it might be more expensive and difficult but obviously you can run your own WAF, DDOS protection etc.
- cf141q5325 3y agoThere are quite a few options, but what could be heard through the grapevines with Kiwifarms most turn out to be theoretical once attackers are motivated enough. Think about them what you will, they make a great canary.
- hexage1814 3y ago>they make a great canary People are naively willing to look to other for a dangerous precedent went it is happening to a person or group that they dislike.
- cf141q5325 3y agoNaive being the key point. Worth mentioning that totalitarianism is often characterized by being the rule of the stupid. Shortsighted actionism and signaling in spite of reality with the resulting corruption growing like a self destructive cancer. Bonhoeffer’s Theory of Stupidity puts it great and Meerloo giving a vivid description of what kind of societies this creates. edit: Willful naivete is not a good life choice. Staying away from darwin awards and are not accidentally creating a fourth reich both require ongoing effort, no falling asleep on the wheel. History tells you this is a valid risk if you dont consider certain things when acting. With the guys having fought the nazis advising you to be less stupid to not repeat that. Seeing how horrible that was, maybe at least try to stay away from that instead of just intending to. This is insanely bad on the severity scale and justifies some effort. Reality is clearly lacking a bright red warning sign here with technology offering ever greater levers for less and less intentioned actions. I can not overstate how bad of an idea it is to ignore that out of group think/tribalism and ego. It simply does not work and in hindsight you could have known. Failing so badly that nobody risks a "having told you so".
- 3y ago
- capableweb 3y agoHave you actually run any sort of web service/website without Cloudflare? This sounds like something straight out of a sales reps mouth, obviously there is more solutions than just Cloudflare out there...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- cf141q5325 3y agoI dont think you appreciate the threat scenario discussed here if you think its reasonable to ask for personal experience. Leaves me to wonder if i am supposed to deny having committed any crimes while we are at it? Still thank you for the response, gives the ability to clarify that this is by no means an advertisement. You have of course endless options for ddos mitigation right now. But once cloudflare no longer wants you, your other options have a tendency to evaporate as well.
- hexage1814 3y ago>But once cloudflare no longer wants you, your other options have a tendency to evaporate as well This! If the forces persecuting you made Cloudflare to drop you, and you go, you establish your own site and your own platform your own infrastructure, unless you have some billions lying around to put fiber optical cables over the oceans physically connecting your servers to the rest of the world, you will depend on other people. And the forces persecuting you, they could just go the next level and start to demand Tier 1 providers to drop you. And the whole thing start to derailing into a cat a mouse game. Where you will have to constantly be thinking "Okay, what is their next move to deplatform me?" Because as you said. Usually when Cloudflare drops you... it's not very absurd to assume banking institutions, Mastercard, Visa, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, etc... will also drop you. And the law pretty much allows those multibillion dollar companies to deny service to a paying costumer, which is a pretty dangerous precedent in my opinion.
- hsbauauvhabzb 3y agoI believe cloudflare drops if they cannot withstand the level of traffic you’re being hit with, which is an exception to your suggestion. As per other posts, if CF drops you, you won’t be able to build your own ddos mitigating infra without billions. Microsoft and Amazon offer similar services, but I’m guessing cloudflare offers the best resiliency based on ops specific naming of CF.
- wbl 3y agoWho got kicked off of Cloudflare? Because both the cases I can think of weren't because of governments and were the sorts of schmucks that you really don't want hanging around.
- cf141q5325 3y agoIt was a generic statement about a path to get rid of unwanted public discourse. The problem is that paths that exist get taken. Examples of who that happened to already and your opinion of who deserves what are not the point. Its totalitarian rot, it doesnt stop, its like a moldy fruit.
- foo-bar-bat 3y agoWait so your point is that if Cloudflare (or anybody?) doesn't want to do business with lying Nazis, then, the world is on an inexorable slippery slope to totalitarian fascism? That's obviously false.
- cf141q5325 3y ago>That's obviously false. That perspective is how being wrong looks here. Its an incredible shortsightedness, you have no basis for that degree of certainty. For starters, if it was so obvious you could explain how. We are talking about a barrier to enter public discourse enforced through DDOS, not freedom to do business with whom you please. This robs you of the ability to self host. With zero checks and balances. You being certain that the likes of the daily stormer shouldnt exist in the public discourse doesnt absolve you of the responsibility for the delete function you just created. For which you have zero concern. That is how a totalitarian slope looks, totalitarians prick holes into the public discourse with no regards for the safe use of such holes. Unsurprising as there is no safe way to do this. Its building a horrific weapon with no targeting mechanism or safety. You having made yourself a totalitarian through your flagrant disregard for the consequences of your actions. Your error lies in believing your intention matters more then the outcome. To the degree that safeguards became unnecessary. You could and should know better, reality always wants its toll for such behavior. edit: Please check the comment a bit down starting with " Naive being the key point." on the use of the term totalitarian. I also mentioned stuff to read on the topic by people a lot more capable then me and and hopefully a lot harder to ignore.
- TechBro8615 3y agoGovernments have more effective ways of deplatforming you than temporarily DDOSing your site.
- gruez 3y agoTaking down a website by sending men with guns is a much worse look for them than an unpopular site succumbing to ddos attacks.