13 ms·
Instagram ads Facebook won't show you
- dannyw 5y agoI like whoever is running Signal's blog.
- spoonjim 5y agoIt’s definitely the executives. You don’t get to say something like “a Cellebrite fell off a truck” if you’re anyone besides the CEO.
- southerntofu 5y agoAnyone with basic legal training would definitely say the same. Anyone reading too much hacking/legal/mafia fiction may say the same. Anyone from France could say the same, given that expression [0] entered common language back in the 70-80's when expropriating logistics trucks to redistribute wealth to poorer neighborhoods was very common practice. [0] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tomb%C3%A9_du_camion https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tomb%C3%A9_du_camion
- rideontime 5y agoIt's not about the commonly-known phrase, it's about the fact that it was used in an official blog post.
- spoonjim 5y agoAnd even cute staged pictures of the Cellebrite in the road. Nobody other than the CEO even would think of doing something so provocative in a space with national security interests and regulators involved.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- robinj6 5y agoMoxie wrote the Cellebrite article.
- hiq 5y agoThere are several writers, you can see their handle and pic at the top of the article. In this case, Jun Harada.
- snotrockets 5y agoThe editors and ghost writers aren't named.
- SmellTheGlove 5y agoThis isn't shocking at all. If anything, it makes me want to make a business account so I can see first hand what targeting criteria would be available to me. I'm not an FB user, but I might as well be, since I have an Instagram account that I mindlessly scroll from time to time.
- fgonzag 5y agoYou don't need a business account but you do need a personal account (or rather a personal account can be a business acct). The targeting is relatively specific. Think of a (general) category and it'll be available. I use it for bars and restaurants at a local level, and the granularity is quite nice vs other media (target people who like bars or restaurants, are into music, are into drinks, are into cocktails, are into concerts currently in the city or who are traveling to this city) It really helps a small budget go a long a way, assuming the stats they give are correct.
- ska 5y ago> assuming the stats they give are correct. And herein lies the rub.
- xmprt 5y agoI'd be surprised if there weren't different tiers of advertising accounts just to prevent normal people from having access to this. For example, you have to spend at least $10k before you get the next level of targeted information.
- SmellTheGlove 5y agoSo you're saying Tom Cruise can probably target ads better than I can? In all seriousness, I wouldn't doubt that either - spend more, target more. But based on the screenshots someone else posted up a bit, it's pretty granular (I presume) by default.
- Rebelgecko 5y agoEven without a business account, you can click the 'why are you showing me this ad' button on FB and it'll give you similar text (although sometimes it's more vague depending on how the ad is targeted)
- jeffrallen 5y agoThis is brilliant and I love it.
- wodenokoto 5y agoThis is a great pr stunt. There’s a similar story about a guy who sets up an add targeted to his wife or fiancé or something. Later Facebook apparently made it so whatever group your targeting has a minimum size.
- monkeywork 5y agoI remember a story told on reddit about a guy who targeted his roommate with incredibly specific ads until it freaked him out.
- drexlspivey 5y agohttps://ghostinfluence.com/the-ultimate-retaliation-pranking-my-roommate-with-targeted-facebook-ads/ https://ghostinfluence.com/the-ultimate-retaliation-pranking...
- tandav 5y ago[not related but] I don't understand why people keep telling that signal app which uses a central server and phone number as identification and verification is secure and safe to use. the future is decentralized
- edoceo 5y agodid you read their home page? ""State-of-the-art end-to-end encryption (powered by the open source Signal Protocol) keeps your conversations secure. We can't read your messages or listen to your calls, and no one else can either. Privacy isn’t an optional mode — it’s just the way that Signal works. Every message, every call, every time."" Have you observed them get sued for records and be unable to deliver?
- Forbo 5y agoBecause your threat model is not everyone's threat model.
- eingaeKaiy8ujie 5y agoAnd it can only be used on insecure platforms, iOS and Android.
- an_opabinia 5y agoA pretty cool piece. Too bad they have to use text to make their point. It would essentially reach zero people due to rules (https://www.facebook.com/business/learn/lessons/how-to-adhere-to-facebook-ad-policy-text-in-images https://www.facebook.com/business/learn/lessons/how-to-adher...). Then there's personal attributes (https://m.facebook.com/policies/ads/prohibited_content/personal_attributes https://m.facebook.com/policies/ads/prohibited_content/perso...). Then ads that do not sell products/services follow murky rules, and talking about Facebook itself is usually prohibited. (edited from: because the rule they're actually breaking is the "No Text" rule in Facebook ad creatives.) Is there non-symbolic imagery that they could have used to say the same thing? Perhaps they should have retained someone with this kind of creative experience. Looking critically, the most narrow and serious obstacle to advocate for privacy is storytelling.
- rcfaj7obqrkayhn 5y ago> because the rule they're actually breaking is the "No Text" rule in Facebook ad creatives maybe breaking the rule was intentional, to make this article work
- enragedcacti 5y agoSignal should sell this exact design on a targeted t-shirt and then advertise that.
- fgonzag 5y agoThough you can't have text in the image, you could put the target filters as the post's text and use the image to grab the attention.
- DisjointedHunt 5y agoThe no text rule has not been enforced to disable an adaccount for years now. It merely de-ranks you. Source: Worked in advertising.
- davidedicillo 5y agoThe rule doesn't exists anymore. Ads with a lot of text simply get penalized when it comes to distribution.
- AlimJaffer 5y agoI've run ads on FB before, but this is an incredibly simple article to share with my non-technically minded friends and family as to why these services collect too much data. We need more of these simple and concise posts to share outside of the tech-bubble we live in.
- martimarkov 5y agoI wonder what the reasoning for disabling the account is. It would be extremely funny if the T&Cs said you can’t expose FB as creepy. :D
- martimarkov 5y agoSomeone mentioned that it’s the “No Text” if anyone else was wondering
- tgsovlerkhgsel 5y agoWhich contradicts Facebook's written policy, so I doubt it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27040800 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27040800 (although Instagram could have different rules)
- disgruntledphd2 5y agoIt's probably the personal data clause. Something like you may not call out personal characteristics of an individual in your ad.
- shakna 5y agoThat rule no longer exists, so it isn't that. It's far more likely to be the "no personal attributes" [0] rule. [0] https://facebook.com/policies/ads/prohibited_content/personal_attributes https://facebook.com/policies/ads/prohibited_content/persona...
- tgsovlerkhgsel 5y agoFor personalized ads, Google bans [1] ads that "Imply knowledge of personally identifiable or sensitive information". Facebook has something similar [2] but much narrower. "Gender Identity" is among the categories though ("LGBTQ adoption" in the first ad), as are medical conditions ("pregnancy exercises" in the second ad). [1] https://support.google.com/adspolicy/answer/143465 https://support.google.com/adspolicy/answer/143465 [2] https://www.facebook.com/policies/ads/prohibited_content/personal_attributes# https://www.facebook.com/policies/ads/prohibited_content/per...
- sharkweek 5y agoSee, the trick here is to put all the personal data onto an oddly specific t-shirt that's for sale. Available now, size "Large" t-shirt for sale! "I'm a proud dad living in Seattle who attended the University of Washington and once went on a trip to Central America for a while. I have a dog and like to read and occasionally complain about politics." I'd buy this if I saw it, if just for the lulz and nihilistic outlook when it comes to privacy. In fact... if I were a privacy-focused company, I'd 100% do this as a marketing stunt.
- _bohm 5y agoIt hurts to admit, but I would probably actually buy one of these
- nemothekid 5y agoYou aren't alone - I know of a company that bootstrapped themselves by abusing the graph API to sell t-shirts.
- gnicholas 5y agoConsidering this is the top post on HN, it's only a matter of time before someone offers these for sale and has a Show HN post about it. I just hope they have a coupon code for HNers!
- hangonhn 5y agoOMG. This is just brilliant on so many levels. It's not just subversive against FB's rules but also can be the start of some kind of art project as a statement about what tech companies know about us. But the project itself gives us a choice in what is shown to others whereas FB doesn't give us that choice when selling the info to advertisers. It'll probably get shut down real quick by FB though once they know about this. Edited: as my sibling comment mentioned, I too would buy one of these shirts.
- disgruntledphd2 5y agoThis has existed since 2014, in embryonic form. The exploit was that FB put your name in the public response from the Graph API. I remember discovering that, saying that might be abusable, and moved on with my life. About a year later, I started getting oddly specific t-shirts like all <last names> do <x good>.
- tehwebguy 5y agoSome more fun reading on Facebook targeting from 2014: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17112559 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17112559
- pyjug 5y ago> The ad would simply display some of the information collected about the viewer which the advertising platform uses. Facebook was not into that idea. Genius! But it’s unclear to me if the examples in the blog were actual ads shown to users before their account was blocked, or the campaign never got off the ground at all. If it’s the latter, the blog should make it clearer otherwise it makes it look like those were real ads
- dannyw 5y agoThose are real targetable attributes under Facebook. They would be real ads if approved.
- spamalot159 5y agoI highly doubt they would ever be approved.
- crowbahr 5y agoRight because they're ads critical of facebook designed to scare facebook users into not using facebook. Why would facebook green light ads that are detrimental to them?
- Dylan16807 5y agoThey're explaining something facebook does without any bias at all. Facebook should be proud to show off their technology! If it's "detrimental" then the problem isn't the ad, so rejecting the ad for that reason is scummy.
- jedberg 5y agoIt's an ad for a competitor. Why would they do that?
- thescriptkiddie 5y ago
- schwinn140 5y agoTheir campaign execution is brilliant...love it. That said, nothing about this is new. Whether Facebook, Google, or any of the other countless (yes, thousands) of players in the AdTech ecosystem, this kind of targeting can be done with ease and for pennies per user. The deprecation of third-party data, cookies, and cross-domain tracking couldn't happen soon enough. It's not a perfect solution but it's certainly a step in the right direction.
- southerntofu 5y agoSeriously how is advertisement legal? If you truly believe in free market then surely you must agree advertisement is a mass manipulation technique that should be illegal as anti-competitive technique (reinforces dominant positions). If you're an anarchist/socialist then surely you've read or seen some talks by Noam Chomsky about "Manufacturing consent" and by now you want to burn down every TV station, bank and police station you can think of. Even if you don't mind printed ads, if you're just a little bit concerned about privacy, you must be out of your mind that certain data obtained about you may be used against you and your loved ones Who's left to defend that kind of degrading practice? How can we put enough social pressure on these people so they stop and develop healthier activities than to hijack our brains remotely?
- pessimizer 5y agoAdvertisement is good because it lets me know who is supplying goods and services I may desire or need. There are a lot of methods allowed in advertising that are basically fraud, and a lot of methods to deliver advertising that are basically stalking. That doesn't mean that people shouldn't be allowed to post what they have for sale.
- southerntofu 5y ago> goods and services I may desire or need Well the thing is the amount of resources spent on advertisement is usually inversely proportional to the amount of resources spent on "goods and services i may desire or need". I'm not saying it should be illegal to post about what you do. But advertisement is paying people to relay your message they couldn't care less about. It's not the same as people recommending products/services, although the frontier has become blurrier now with all those "sponsored" articles/videos.
- TchoBeer 5y agoIs the only way you out about things you want through ads? I don't even remember the last time I made a purchase because of an advertisement.
- 5y ago
- dartharva 5y agoThe irony that Signal itself has an Instagram account... https://www.instagram.com/signal_app/ https://www.instagram.com/signal_app/
- Forbo 5y agoWhen it comes to guerrilla warfare, sometimes you have to use your opponent's own tools against them.
- onassar 5y agoCould be seen as ironic, but I frame it more in the light of being critical of something, yet also understanding the value it can bring. I may be critical of industrial farming, large corporate environmental policies and/or Facebook, but I still might buy corn, own a Toyota and use Facebook to keep up with friends overseas. I think it can be super hard to take an ideological position at the expense of functionality (obviously depends on how strongly you hold your views, and what the cost of forgoing engagement with that company/person is).
- robertlagrant 5y ago> I may be critical of industrial farming, large corporate environmental policies and/or Facebook, but I still might buy corn, own a Toyota and use Facebook to keep up with friends overseas. This could just another example of inconsistency of thought, or frivolousness of opinion.
- onassar 5y ago;)
- Someone1234 5y agoThis is both an ad for Signal and an ad for Facebook Ad's ability to target depending on who is reading it. What I mean is that for your average consumer, they'll read this and be horrified that Facebook is using the information they voluntarily gave Facebook to make money. But someone who is buying ads will read this same thing, be impressed by just how tightly Facebook can target, and put $10K into an Ad Account to try it out. As to me, I use Facebook, I am willing to see ads within Facebook using the information I share with Facebook but where I draw the line is Facebook "leaking" into my wider web browsing history (either tracking me, or using my non-Facebook browsing to advertise to me on Facebook). Therefore, I use Mozilla's Facebook Container extension and blacklist Facebook/Instagram's "Share" tracking buttons. I also access Facebook from a mobile browser rather than app and use Signal instead of Facebook Messager, to limit Facebook's ability to track my location and other phone meta-data.
- benjaminjosephw 5y agoIt's absolutely transparent then that, without intervention, companies act in ways that are against individual's and society's best interests in order to make more money. With that evident fact, we to face the reality, however uncomfortable, that manufacturing desire at this scale has become unambiguously unethical.
- fzzzy 5y agoHave we also reached a point where no intervention will fix the problem?
- benjaminjosephw 5y agoNo
- jerf 5y agoAny ad person in 2021 who isn't aware of this must be a sophomore in college still.
- 5y ago
- quacked 5y agoFor any that haven't seen it- a great essay on advertising and how it relates to cancer: http://jacek.zlydach.pl/blog/2019-07-31-ads-as-cancer.html http://jacek.zlydach.pl/blog/2019-07-31-ads-as-cancer.html
- jayzalowitz 5y agoReduce the amount of text, theyll let you run it.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- djanogo 5y agoAnd they are building signal for peddling their ecoin?
- meepmorp 5y agoI believe they're making a point about privacy and ad targeting that's somehow orthogonal to their cryptocurrency.
- warkdarrior 5y agoIt is not orthogonal, they are clearly positioning their own cryptocurrency-via-chat as preserving privacy and are signaling that they are better than Facebook in that respect.
- shkkmo 5y agoSignal is a non-profit that was primarily funded by a WhatsApp co-founder who left Facebook because they didn't like the plans to add Ads to WhatsApp.
- monocasa 5y agoFrom what I've heard, that was a zero interest loan that needs to be slowly paid back.
- skinnymuch 5y agoI don’t see how people believe the founders of Whatsapp didn’t know what was going to happen. They are getting a free pass and even more than that - praise. No one gives you $19 billion dollars for a product..only to barely monetize it and do it inconsistently with how the rest of the related company operates.
- shkkmo 5y agoThe amount of money that was left on the table in their early departure leads me to think there was at least some naivety on the way in to that deal.
- intricatedetail 5y agoFacebook business model will not be banned as they do what services always wanted to have - a large network of wilful informants. Keep feeding them data.
- labseven 5y agoSam Lavigne did a similar project in 2017, generating targeted video ads on twitter. https://lav.io/projects/the-infinite-campaign/ https://lav.io/projects/the-infinite-campaign/
- cercatrova 5y agoI didn't know there was this level of detail in FB ads, I'll have to start targeting more specific audiences for my ads then. Very useful info.
- einpoklum 5y agoFacebook is terrible. However, Signal has its own failings as well. From what I understand, it: * Refuses to federate. * Hostile to independent clients. * Run as a one-man show. That's not Facebook-bad, but it's sad that Signal is consistently exhibiting this attitude, meaning that it can't be a good basis for personal instant messaging going into the future.
- rhizome 5y agoIn what way are those failings?
- warkdarrior 5y agoIn that it is similar to how Facebook operates: * Facebook refuses to federate. * Facebook is hostile to independent clients. * Facebook is run as a one-man show. And everyone agrees Facebook is Bad(TM).
- einpoklum 5y agoI did say Facebook is terrible...
- benslv 5y agoHang on, that doesn't feel like great logic to use. With no explanation as to why those points are bad, is it not the same as just saying, "Facebook and Signal both have websites, host a mobile app, and use the colour blue in their branding, and since everyone agrees Facebook is bad then Signal must be, too"?
- gempir 5y agoThey have good reasons for doing so. Watch this talk if you actually want to learn why https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj3YFprqAr8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj3YFprqAr8 If you don't, use something else. But using Signal is for sure a lot better than using Facebook Messenger or WhatsApp.
- spamalot159 5y agoSignal hitting hard as always. I wonder if they are trying to get people to stop talking about their cryptocurrency hiccup.
- xyst 5y agocant this be fooled though? I believe there is a site where you could select a "profile" and it would open up these links in your browser to give off the impression of that profile. For example, if you selecting "wealthy" it would just open up a bunch of urls to expensive brands, luxury items, private charter jets. I am not entirely sure if it actually worked or not.
- the_pwner224 5y agoThis doesn't seem very effective to me. 99% of people who see an ad like that will not care. It's already common knowledge that Zuck's gonna take your data. "Facebook knows I'm a single teacher in Moscow who likes soccer? ... So what? And that's before taking into account that the labels FB/etc. put on you are often incorrect, further diluting the perceived seriousness of this privacy leak.
- dharmin007 5y agoExactly my thought. The "So what. What do I care if Facebook shows me ads for the things I browsed on Amazon or Etsy. I often discover fun stuff directly from those ads for websites I wasn't even familiar with. On the contrary (and I could be wrong to do so) but I trust some website when I have seen its ad on Facebook, as I know it has been vetted by Facebook to not be some fraud.
- warkdarrior 5y agoPlus, it will likely lead me to think "How does this company that advertises on Facebook know so much about me? What kind of shady information practices do they have?"
- Spivak 5y agoYou're missing an /s for the last bit, right? Like I'm actually with you that really specific targeting is actually great for product discovery and I wish I could harness it for myself not via ads sometimes but there is so much obvious crap and scams on FB/IG ads that it's not even funny. I have more faith that I'll actually get the product choosing a random AliExpress seller than a random Facebook ad.
- octocop 5y ago>99% of people who see an ad like that will not care. You're making quite the assumption here mate.
- Spivak 5y agoFlip the number. If your ad for literally anything had a conversion rate of 1/100 you would be over the moon. I think it's quite the overestimation that even 1/100 would do anything on seeing this ad.
- Jsharm 5y agoIs there a way I can see this for myself? Ie who facebook thinks I am? Is there something similar for google or other ad networks?
- Karunamon 5y agoYou can get an extremely limited look on the ad preferences page. "Categories used to reach you" and "audience-based advertising". Nothing quite as slick as this little instagram hack. https://www.facebook.com/adpreferences/ad_settings https://www.facebook.com/adpreferences/ad_settings
- crakhamster01 5y agoFacebook already has a way in-app for you to see why you were targeted with an ad (on any ad click the 3-dot menu -> "Why am I seeing this ad?"). The tool will tell you things like whether you were retargeted vs targeted using lookalike audiences, targeted based off of your age, gender, location, interests, etc. I don't think this is the "slam dunk" the author intends it to be, but I'm sure it will resonate with the Woke™ hackernews crowd regardless.
- not2b 5y agoFacebook's "Why am I seeing this ad?" info is deliberately incomplete and does not reveal exactly how the advertiser targeted the ad. https://qz.com/1245941/why-am-i-seeing-this-ad-explanations-on-facebook-are-incomplete-and-misleading-a-study-says/ https://qz.com/1245941/why-am-i-seeing-this-ad-explanations-...
- crakhamster01 5y agoHit a paywall so I can't comment on the article, but just from the hero image the current implementation has more detail than what's being shown there. It looks like this article was last updated in 2018 though, so its claims might be dated?
- notsobig 5y agoguess what this guy does for a living...
- crakhamster01 5y ago:) is not taking things at face value a profession?
- creata 5y agoBelieve it or not, sometimes you want to raise awareness about something that would otherwise be hidden behind a kebab menu and rendered entirely clinical. I don't think this is the sound criticism you intend it to be.
- achairapart 5y agoI don't know if it's just me but I can't stop thinking about the day Facebook & Co will get bored with selling those stupid ads and will use all their powerful datasets to do more dangerous, scary things. Will then everybody think "Oh, I really didn't see this coming..."?
- SyzygistSix 5y agoOr someone else will do something with their data.
- not2b 5y agoOr perhaps they'll set their algorithms free to figure out how to better monetize all the info Facebook has on people, and the machines will figure out that blackmail is a possibility: maybe FB could sell ads that would let you pay not to have certain information shared.
- tempest_ 5y agoYou can export the data Facebook has on you and see what could be used to populate these ads for you. https://www.facebook.com/help/212802592074644 https://www.facebook.com/help/212802592074644
- dillondoyle 5y agoThis isn't some attack on Signal specifically the personal ads policy has already existed and it was enforced against us once with a somewhat similar idea for voter locality. It would have been approved likely if took out the 'you' voice examples in the policy below. Though I understand the point of this as marketing & article to educate on what data FB does have and the ads look really cool! https://www.facebook.com/policies/ads/prohibited_content/personal_attributes https://www.facebook.com/policies/ads/prohibited_content/per...
- octocop 5y agoSignal has been putting out 10/10 content lately, I hope they keep it up and in the mean time I will continue to use their services!
- hart_russell 5y agoBrilliant ad campaign. So scummy that facebook allows advertisers these insights, but immediately shuts it down when you try to inform their users.
- nullc 5y agoYears ago I added a widget to the user interface on wikipedia for logged in users so that people were able to add geography specific notification to tell editors about meetups that were coming up in their area. It turned out that if the message displayed was too specific, like "Upcoming meetup in your area: [New York meetup]" people got rather angry about the privacy invasion. So instead the instructions for setting the messages had to tell the authors to instead say stuff like "Find out about upcoming meetups!" -- which of course was only displayed if there actually was an upcoming meetup near where you geolocated. Of course, regardless of if any message is displayed the site could guess your geography based on your IP address. The exposure of private information was nearly identical-- actually arguably worse because someone might mention that they're currently seeing a notice without realizing that this fact leaked their geography... but the more generic messages didn't generate complaints. (and WP policy effectively makes it impossible to edit via Tor, even for established users in good standing) Sometimes it seems people care a lot more about enjoying the illusion of privacy than they care about actually having privacy.
- etrabroline 5y ago>Sometimes it seems people care a lot more about enjoying the illusion of privacy than they care about actually having privacy. Hiding the fact that you are spying on someone enough to make them stop openly complaining about it doesn't make them ok with you spying on them.
- hetspookjee 5y agoHa, when the Ledger Nano database was leaked a few months ago it published the address data of roughly 300k users, including their email. Given the fact that you can upload e-mail adresses to Facebook for more directed targetting (really nice feature lol), I thought it might be fitting to advertise a 5$ wrench offer to each of these users and if they might be interested in one. Really weird actually that it's OK to upload other peoples contacts to such services without any checks whatsoever.
- pta2002 5y agoYou can use that feature to do some incredibly specific targeting to mess with people - as in, make some incredibly targeted ads that will only show up for a single person.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- enahs-sf 5y agoWould be cool to sign in with Facebook and then generate the ad set for yourself that they WOULD have made. I think it’d be quite telling.
- unnouinceput 5y agoAnd then there is me who has no idea about ads. NoScript, PiHole and uBlock Origin tend to do that so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- philshem 5y agoThat doesn’t mean that you aren’t being micro-targeted by ads. It just means you don’t see to whom your personal information is being sold.
- unnouinceput 5y agoConsidering that: 1 - using this setup means considerably less info is exiting my systems to feed the beast and 2 - exactly because I don't see them they're wasting their time on me I'd say mission accomplished. Wanna guess in how many months the current state of ads/ad R&D would drop to 0 if everyone would do the same like me? Here is a funny story, from this year. crackwatch dot com (the site, not the reddit) went down. why? because pirates that flocked there with thousands, all had this setup and they got exactly zero ad revenue from their users. Of course they went with a nice corporate BS "we could use more aggressive ads to raise revenue for servers but we respect you guys too much for something like that bla bla..." - translation: we know is not going to work so we just going to cut our losses.
- TchoBeer 5y agoSo you acknowledge that if everyone acted like you, it would destroy most of the sites we use every day?
- skinnymuch 5y agoI’m going to echo the sibling commenter. You somehow tried to negate my hypothetical App Store pirates by saying it’s a different situation without commenting on actual substance. Now you’re admitting your set up is awful for creators and would screw things up for genuine people if everyone did it. Just because whatever creator example may not be a good site or person doesn’t mean that’s how everyone is. I’m sure you wouldn’t want everyone taking whatever service or product your livelihood depends on.
- mNovak 5y agoIs it just me though, that for how targeted FB and Google try to be, they're usually still way off? I mean sure they'll know things like relationship status that I directly input, but the inferences are often very incorrect.
- lucasnortj 5y agoonly a fool has a social media account, I followed Jaron Lanier's advice and delete them all years ago. I have not missed them for a second
- RAULSILVADOS 5y agoNFTTY it's really changing the game in the crypto space knowing how hoy the nft world it's right no , this proyect Will melt serious faces in this bulll run ,thanks TCL to put it out for us #thecryptolifestyle #nft #Poolz #tcl #mr100x https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8zcfalougY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8zcfalougY
- RAULSILVADOS 5y agoNFTTY it's really changing the game in the crypto space knowing how hoy the nft world it's right no , this proyect Will melt serious faces in this bulll run ,thanks TCL to put it out for us #thecryptolifestyle #nft #Poolz #tcl #mr100x https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8zcfalougYS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8zcfalougYS
- h0nd 5y agoLooking at the 'Suggested for you' posts in Facebook and Instagram, I am really puzzled about the way data is used. Whereas they definitely have access to a lot of (my) data, they are still unable to correctly know my gender. And speaking of rules for ads. I recently noticed that most of the ads are pure spam and even fake products are offered. It is extremely obvious what this is about.