notsobig

4 ms·

1.
by notsobig 5y ago
I mean look, my goal is to communicate to the engineers involved in this business that they are responsible for the product they work on, and the monster they've created. People working for G and fb have options. If they choose to cont
2.
by notsobig 5y ago
Not only do you spend your day job helping to clutter our web experience, suck up our personal data, and track us across the web, but you want to spend your free time whoring out your blog to us to try to justify the career choice you feel
3.
by notsobig 5y ago
This would be an appropriate place to disclose your glaring conflict of interest.
4.
by notsobig 5y ago
guess what this guy does for a living...
5.
by notsobig 6y ago
No no but gates is our hero now... It disgusts me how short public memory can be.
6.
by notsobig 6y ago
i was amazed when i looked into it. brave did it, safari had it hidden in the developer menu, chrome: nope. i figured there was something to be gained for them. ultimately there arent too many sites you type out much of an endpoint for, but
7.
by notsobig 6y ago
Honestly this is not relevant. My comment was not "what i think happened", it was "your argument is tilted crap". The action allegedly taken is not evidence of guilt, is all I was saying.
8.
by notsobig 6y ago
What's your point? If a bio research lab is accidentally allowing the public to come in contact with anything it is studying, this is something we need to 1. investigate 2. identify 3. prevent Saying "it's possible this could
9.
by notsobig 6y ago
"urgent law at lightning speed" is unnecessary and extreme bias. It might tell me something if you included a source. A rational actor would take the opportunity to do this regardless of whether or not the source was known at the