22 ms·

GBatteries (YC W14) let you charge your car as quickly as visiting the pump

65 points by mikek 8y ago

Animats 8y ago
Chargers already pay attention to charging curves and temperature. Is there really much room for safely charging existing batteries faster?
- URSpider94 8y ago
  Reading between the lines, the constraint is that today’s chargers are always monotonically increasing state of charge with a roughly steady DC applied current (tapering slightly at the high end). Adding in something like pulsed charging or even some reverse-voltage segments could potentially change the charging dynamics enough to let the battery charge much faster without damage.
- clouddrover 8y ago
  The Porsche Taycan and the future Audi e-tron GT can make use of 350 kW chargers to get to 80% charge in 15 minutes. 350 kW chargers are being deployed on the Ionity and Electrify charger networks now: https://insideevs.com/ionity-debuts-350-kw-ultra-fast-charging-station/ https://insideevs.com/ionity-debuts-350-kw-ultra-fast-chargi... Volkswagen probably will be the biggest producer of battery electrics within 3 years. They own 12 car brands (including Porsche and Audi https://www.volkswagenag.com/en/brands-and-models.html https://www.volkswagenag.com/en/brands-and-models.html). VW also has a stake in Ionity and they own Electrify America and Electrify Canada. If this charging technique really does work then I imagine VW will license it.
stcredzero 8y ago
The system uses AI to optimize the charging systems in electric cars. Here's one thing that stinks about current/last gen electric cars. I drove with my wife from my apartment in Nob Hill to Santa Cruz, using up about 92% of my range. I was able to find a charger and get fully recharged for my trip back. All of that is fine. What was disturbing, was that while I was climbing those initial hills out of Santa Cruz, my range figure dipped way below my miles to go figure. As I left behind that initial climb, my range figure then went comfortably above my miles to go. This is one place where some judicious AI could help. (Along with integration with GPS/Maps and destination information. I should also update my electric car to technology ca. 2019.)
- umeshunni 8y ago
  Telsas do that, FYI. They take elevation and temperature during a trip to estimate where on the energy usage curve you are at any point in your trip. Here's an article from 2015 when they introduced that feature: https://www.teslarati.com/closer-look-tesla-firmware-6-1-trip-energy-prediction/ https://www.teslarati.com/closer-look-tesla-firmware-6-1-tri...
  - spullara 8y ago
    Absolutely true and it works. For example, my Tesla S (2014) very accurately predicts mileage going from Los Altos to Tahoe (up hill, have to recharge on the way) and from Tahoe to Los Altos (down hill, can barely make it back without charging).
birdman3131 8y ago
There is a fix for slow charging that is literally as fast as filling a tank but nobody wants to use it. (I assume it is the same reason that there are pages and pages of battery improvements that never make it to market.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_battery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_battery
- stcredzero 8y ago
  In the case of flow batteries, don't a lot of them have poor power to weight figures? Those liquids are heavy, but aren't nearly as power dense as gasoline.
- i80and 8y ago
  Flow batteries, at least the kind that are commercially adoptable in the present/near-future (Vanadium redox), scale in capacity very easily. The downsides are twofold: * Poor power density * Relatively limited nominal power output These compromises are fine for stationary applications, but for vehicles, they'd be a riskier bet as far as I'm aware. (disclaimer: not a subject matter expert)
- lolc 8y ago
  The other fix would be swappable batteries. But it would require a huge engineering effort.
  - dexen 8y ago
    >swappable batteries would require a huge engineering effort. Worked just fine back in 2013. The people's habits were the only obstacle: owners wanted to retain their own battery pack, instead of getting pre-owned one left by somebody else, in unknown condition. And/or drive over a weird contraption. [1] (loud music warning) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5V0vL3nnHY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5V0vL3nnHY
    - SketchySeaBeast 8y ago
      I wonder why it bothers people about battery packs, but not propane tanks. They seem to have equal chances of exploding.
orky56 8y ago
This could definitely revolutionize the electric car market by removing one of the main complaints, slow charge time. The other pending issues for even greater mass adoption are availability of charging stations & range. If charge time decreases, the turnover of cars at stations could dramatically increase thereby improving the economics of charging stations. We could see more charging stations then and more quickly remove these barriers. Has this AI approach been used in other charging applications? Curious to hear more details on what's going on behind the scenes.
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
popotamonga 8y ago
Do people in the US take 15m to visit the pump?
- frei 8y ago
  No, it's usually more like 5 minutes
  - stcredzero 8y ago
    When I'm on road trips with my friends, I can never get them out of a rest stop faster than 25 minutes. When I'm on the road with my wife, 15 minutes is about the right time.
    - SketchySeaBeast 8y ago
      Are you sitting at the pump the whole time?
      - stcredzero 8y ago
        In the case of my friends, I'm sitting at the pump or standing in the store texting my friends. In the case of my wife, I'm waiting for her to get out of the restroom.
    - Dylan16807 8y ago
      That's the time it takes to visit the convenience store. Relevant in some circumstances, but if you're not already in need of a break you only visit the pump and even five minutes is oddly slow. And the article and company site specifically say the time to fill the tank, not to visit a gas station. So they're blatantly lying.
      - stcredzero 8y ago
        For my personal situation, I can't fill the tank in under 25 minutes on road trips with my friends. So it works for me.
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
choeger 8y ago
That sounds like a cry to be bought by the highest bidder. Just of the shelf hardware and some pixie dust, err, "AI". Sure thing they'll find some car company that will sink some millions into their company.
- ianhowson 8y ago
  Remember the Tesla insider that leaked a bunch of firmware and system details? https://twitter.com/atomicthumbs/status/1032939652393521156 https://twitter.com/atomicthumbs/status/1032939652393521156 If it's to believed, the charge rate limit from a Supercharger is already maxed out -- they're pushing energy into the battery as fast as the charger can supply it (and taking some safety risks in the process). This same company has been around for a few years with spurious claims about improving laptop battery life with their AI algorithms. So far nobody has seen evidence that it works, and nobody is lining up to buy them.
dkoston 8y ago
476mi/h of charging isn’t gorundbreaking. Aston Martin, Tesla and Porsche already charge at those speeds or faster. https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1118575_gm-working-on-ultra-fast-charging-system-for-chevy-bolt-ev https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1118575_gm-working-on-u... I believe their “secret sauce” is allowing existing packs which charge slower to get “up to speed”. If so, that’s a pretty limited market as it’s likely that within a few years, all EVs sold will charge faster than the listed speeds. They’ll likely have a maximum tota addressable market of a few hundred thousand cars with only a few thousand real consumers. Most people buying electric cars with slower chargers are doing so because those vehicles fit their lifestyle and wouldn’t have a massive incentive to buy a new charger.
- timsher 8y ago
  Hi! I'm one of the founders at GBatteries - I’ve partially answered this in another comment, so will copy paste portions. We've demonstrated 5 min to 50% charge, 10 min to 100% charge - below is a demo that we’ve done at CES 2019, and that we’re now exhibiting at the Detroit Auto show demonstrating this. [Video here: https://youtu.be/kSLrqR4TfnU https://youtu.be/kSLrqR4TfnU Note: Charging times can vary by ~1 minute here and there, because the algorithm is adaptive and characteristics of batteries change from moment to moment.] The problem with batteries today is not charging speed; it’s possible to charge any battery quickly, but the faster you charge a battery the faster it will degrade. Our technology is able to decrease the irreversible chemical reactions that happen during charging, so that the same batteries can be charged fast without compromising cycle life. We’re working on enabling existing packs to charge as fast as possible. We’re not able to fast charge at these levels without approval from the OEM as they have limits built-in. We need to either be integrated inside of the vehicle, or on the charger but have the vehicles "approval" for charging at these higher rates, as at Level 3 and up it's DC to the pack.
  - dkoston 8y ago
    Thanks for the added clarity. Being able to charge from below 50% without damaging cycle life is huge. Would be great to see some cycle life charts showing GBatteries vs traditional chargers. One of the other challenges you may face is the lack of consumer knowledge about how charging affects cycle life. Since consumers tend to charge batteries in ways that dramatically reduce cycles, this is potentially huge. Figuring out how to create demand from consumers will be very important as OEMs don’t really have any motivation here. Cycle life isn’t published nor really considered by consumers when they buy devices with rechargeable batteries.
floatrock 8y ago
Super skeptical here, or at least the wording is misleading as hell. > The product allows users to charge a 60kWh EV battery pack with 119 miles of range in 15 minutes as compared to 15 miles in 15 minutes today. > The technology works with off-the-shelf lithium ion batteries and existing fast charge infrastructure by integrating via a patented self-contained adapter on a car charge port First read says that they're delivering 60kWh in 15min, or they're pumping electrons at 240kW. This is just nonsense -- most deployed DC fast chargers are 50kW... the charger companies and the OEMs are experimenting with 200kW chargers, but those are liquid cooled. So physics says this is nonsense. Okay, so second read: the 60 kWh is distracting technobabble, and what they're ACTUALLY doing is "adding 119 miles of range in 15 minutes." The just-announced Nissan Leaf e+ has a 62 kWh battery with 226 miles of range. When you DC Fast Charge, going from 0-80% takes about as much time as going from 80-100% (EV roadtripping is about doing frequent small charging because of this phenomenon, not one-time top-offs like with gas). The Nissan Leaf e+ is about a 60 kWh battery, and if they're adding "119 miles of range in 15 minutes", that's about half the Leaf's 226 mi range, so call it "30 kWh of charge in 15 min". That means they're charging at an average of 120kW. Okay, now we're back within the realm of physics. Note the Leaf e+'s (yet unreleased hardware) still only accepts a maximum of 100kW DC fast charging. I think jaguar has experimented with 150kW charging on the ipace (but again, liquid cooled cables). So they're saying they found a way to cycle fast charging and get about a 20% improvement in average charging rate from the current kinda-top-of-the-line tech, and only for the first 50% battery capacity. Not nothing, but hardly "as quickly as visiting the pump", especially since whatever tricks they use likely won't continue for the next 50% of the battery.
- spullara 8y ago
  Tesla superchargers also peak out at 120KW.
- timsher 8y ago
  Hi! I'm one of the founders at GBatteries, please let me try to clear that up. We've demonstrated 5 min to 50% charge, 10 min to 100% - I’ll edit this to include a demo that we’ve done at CES 2019, and that we’re now exhibiting at the Detroit Auto show demonstrating. [EDIT] Video here: https://youtu.be/kSLrqR4TfnU https://youtu.be/kSLrqR4TfnU Note: Charging times can vary by ~1 minute here and there, because the algorithm is adaptive and characteristics of batteries change from moment to moment. >First read says that they're delivering 60kWh in 15min, or they're pumping electrons at 240kW. This is just nonsense -- most deployed DC fast chargers are 50kW... the charger companies and the OEMs are experimenting with 200kW chargers, but those are liquid cooled. So physics says this is nonsense. >Okay, so second read: the 60 kWh is distracting technobabble, and what they're ACTUALLY doing is "adding 119 miles of range in 15 minutes." There’s a mistake in the article, in both cases it should be in 5 minutes; should be corrected shortly. In this example, we’re talking about a 60kWh battery with 238 miles of range (Chevy Bolt). Right now the car charges 90miles in 30 minutes, or 15 miles in 5 minutes because the manufacturer limits the charging rate for the batteries in order to preserve their life. Our technology can enable these Li-ion batteries to charge in 5 min to 50%, or 119 miles. This example assumes that the car goes to a fast charging station that has enough power to charge the vehicle in this time; fast charge infrastructure that’s currently being put up by companies like Ionity (350kW), Electrify America, or Charge Point (500kW capability). The problem with batteries today is not charging speed; it’s possible to charge any battery quickly, but the faster you charge a battery the faster it will degrade. Our technology is able to decrease the irreversible chemical reactions that happen during charging, so that the same batteries can be charged fast without compromising cycle life.
patejam 8y ago
This is a straight up lie right? My car (2017 Honda Accord) has a 500+ mile range on a tank of gas. It'd take over an hour to charge to 500 miles. Even at 15 minutes that's a lie. It takes no more than 2-3 minutes of actual pumping to fill my 500+ mile tank of gas.
- dawnerd 8y ago
  Can take 15 minutes+ in Oregon since we can't pump our own gas. But yeah, last road trip I got ~600 miles out of a full tank. This company has a loooong way to go if they want to compete with that.
  - patejam 8y ago
    Even in Oregon (or NJ where I'm originally from), it takes longer because of stuff outside of the actual pumping. So if for some reason you're not allowed to charge your own car, it'd just move from 15 minutes to 30 minutes. Also in NJ it definitely doesn't take more than 5 extra minutes waiting for the attendant 95% of the time.
    - jerrysievert 8y ago
      depending on the station, and how many attendants are working, you can be up around 30 minutes. I've seen some very efficient stations that do a lot of turnaround, and some very inefficient stations that have 10 lanes of 6-8 cars per lane waiting. that said, even at a full tank, that's only 220 miles for me, so unless I'm leaving Oregon on a trip, a 15 minute charge sounds amazing. the good news is that I've not seen a charging station that had an attendant.
  - deleted 8y ago
    [deleted]
- sundvor 8y ago
  Came here to post exactly this. Misleading click baity headline; it doesn't take me much more than 2-3 minutes to fill up 55 litres of fuel to my 65 liter tank, for 700km+ range. (I'm not in the habit of running it dry!)
lgleason 8y ago
If a car's battery system is not set up for this kind of a charge rate (IE: it maxes at 7.2 amp 240 volt level 2), there is no way their system can just attach to your port and charge your car faster. There are on-board controllers etc. that are controlled (for good reason), by the car/manufacturer that would need to be bypassed.
frostyj 8y ago
Might be naive here, but isn't there some sort of limitation on the battery side as well?
nathanaldensr 8y ago
I hope people realize this "article" is nothing more than a PR puff piece.
snazz 8y ago
If this works as advertised, it’s super cool. However, my anecdotal experience suggests that things that charge faster heat up, and I know that my phone warms up significantly on with the “fast charger” it came with. Knowing that batteries are potentially very volatile and prone to exploding and leaking, how safe is this technology?
- URSpider94 8y ago
  All modern EV’s except the Leaf have liquid-cooled battery packs with active cooling from the radiator and the A/C compressor.
dsd 8y ago
Why don't we just do removable batteries?
- hndamien 8y ago
  Company would have to own the batteries, users have no incentive to treat them well. Tragedy of the commons.
  - Wowfunhappy 8y ago
    How does one treat a battery poorly? I mean, I know in the abstract sense that it's ideal if they ever get fully drained and, but that's not all that catastrophic. I'd consider it normal use in most cases—if manufacturers don't want the charge to ever dip that low, they should make the battery stop working earlier.
    - hndamien 8y ago
      I presume you mean don't get fully drained. They also should not get fully charged either. They could make the battery stop working earlier and limit them from being filled, but this is going to limit a lot of one time use cases when the trade off is worthwhile.
      - Wowfunhappy 8y ago
        > They could make the battery stop working earlier and limit them from being filled, but this is going to limit a lot of one time use cases when the trade off is worthwhile. Which brings me back to my original question: how does one treat a battery poorly? Or perhaps more accurately, how would people treat batteries they rent more poorly than ones they own? In a world where consumers were highly cognizant of maintaining battery health, and only fully drained/charged their batteries when absolutely essential, I can see how rented batteries would be a problem. In practice, I doubt many consumers actually think about this, if they're even aware of it to begin with. Ergo, I don't forsee rented batteries dying significantly sooner than owned batteries, because most consumers aren't going to change their behavior.
jartelt 8y ago
Are there going to be any issues with peak demand charges from utilities making fast charging cost prohibitive? I have to imagine that pulling that much power from the grid will either be very expensive or will require some grid upgrades to prevent issues.
newman8r 8y ago
If you could recharge while waiting in line for fast food, that would eliminate the need to ever go to a 'gas station' at all. These guys should partner with sonic or something, drive-in style.
nikanj 8y ago
UBeam et al have demonstrated that flat out ignoring physics can be an extremely reliable way to raise funding and score press visibility. Here’s hoping this won’t end up on the same list.
kwhitefoot 8y ago
The obsession with fast charging is getting tiresome. Here in Norway we have more electric cars per head than anywhere else and most people wake up to a fully charged car. It is really rare to need to charge the car at a public charger unless you have nowhere off road to park your car. What is most needed in most places is somewhere to charge the car overnight or while you are at work. Such chargers need no new technology, no extra infrastructure beyond a simple socket in a post beside the road or in each parking space in car parks.
- C1sc0cat 8y ago
  A lot of countries are much denser and don't have off road parking where you can run a cooker circuit 415v to
- gwbas1c 8y ago
  Fast charging is needed for road trips, and for people who don't have access to a charger at home. (Think about people who rent or who need to park on the street)
gwbas1c 8y ago
> as compared to 15 miles in 15 minutes today. My Tesla Model 3 gets 75 miles in 15 minutes at the supercharger.

65 points by mikek 8y ago

Chargers already pay attention to charging curves and temperature. Is there really much room for safely charging existing batteries faster?

URSpider94 8y ago
Reading between the lines, the constraint is that today’s chargers are always monotonically increasing state of charge with a roughly steady DC applied current (tapering slightly at the high end). Adding in something like pulsed charging or even some reverse-voltage segments could potentially change the charging dynamics enough to let the battery charge much faster without damage.
clouddrover 8y ago
The Porsche Taycan and the future Audi e-tron GT can make use of 350 kW chargers to get to 80% charge in 15 minutes. 350 kW chargers are being deployed on the Ionity and Electrify charger networks now: https://insideevs.com/ionity-debuts-350-kw-ultra-fast-charging-station/ https://insideevs.com/ionity-debuts-350-kw-ultra-fast-chargi... Volkswagen probably will be the biggest producer of battery electrics within 3 years. They own 12 car brands (including Porsche and Audi https://www.volkswagenag.com/en/brands-and-models.html https://www.volkswagenag.com/en/brands-and-models.html). VW also has a stake in Ionity and they own Electrify America and Electrify Canada. If this charging technique really does work then I imagine VW will license it.

stcredzero 8y ago

The system uses AI to optimize the charging systems in electric cars. Here's one thing that stinks about current/last gen electric cars. I drove with my wife from my apartment in Nob Hill to Santa Cruz, using up about 92% of my range. I was able to find a charger and get fully recharged for my trip back. All of that is fine. What was disturbing, was that while I was climbing those initial hills out of Santa Cruz, my range figure dipped way below my miles to go figure. As I left behind that initial climb, my range figure then went comfortably above my miles to go. This is one place where some judicious AI could help. (Along with integration with GPS/Maps and destination information. I should also update my electric car to technology ca. 2019.)

umeshunni 8y ago
Telsas do that, FYI. They take elevation and temperature during a trip to estimate where on the energy usage curve you are at any point in your trip. Here's an article from 2015 when they introduced that feature: https://www.teslarati.com/closer-look-tesla-firmware-6-1-trip-energy-prediction/ https://www.teslarati.com/closer-look-tesla-firmware-6-1-tri...
- spullara 8y ago
  Absolutely true and it works. For example, my Tesla S (2014) very accurately predicts mileage going from Los Altos to Tahoe (up hill, have to recharge on the way) and from Tahoe to Los Altos (down hill, can barely make it back without charging).

birdman3131 8y ago

There is a fix for slow charging that is literally as fast as filling a tank but nobody wants to use it. (I assume it is the same reason that there are pages and pages of battery improvements that never make it to market.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_battery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_battery

stcredzero 8y ago
In the case of flow batteries, don't a lot of them have poor power to weight figures? Those liquids are heavy, but aren't nearly as power dense as gasoline.
i80and 8y ago
Flow batteries, at least the kind that are commercially adoptable in the present/near-future (Vanadium redox), scale in capacity very easily. The downsides are twofold: * Poor power density * Relatively limited nominal power output These compromises are fine for stationary applications, but for vehicles, they'd be a riskier bet as far as I'm aware. (disclaimer: not a subject matter expert)
lolc 8y ago
The other fix would be swappable batteries. But it would require a huge engineering effort.
- dexen 8y ago
  >swappable batteries would require a huge engineering effort. Worked just fine back in 2013. The people's habits were the only obstacle: owners wanted to retain their own battery pack, instead of getting pre-owned one left by somebody else, in unknown condition. And/or drive over a weird contraption. [1] (loud music warning) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5V0vL3nnHY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5V0vL3nnHY
  - SketchySeaBeast 8y ago
    I wonder why it bothers people about battery packs, but not propane tanks. They seem to have equal chances of exploding.

orky56 8y ago

This could definitely revolutionize the electric car market by removing one of the main complaints, slow charge time. The other pending issues for even greater mass adoption are availability of charging stations & range. If charge time decreases, the turnover of cars at stations could dramatically increase thereby improving the economics of charging stations. We could see more charging stations then and more quickly remove these barriers. Has this AI approach been used in other charging applications? Curious to hear more details on what's going on behind the scenes.

deleted 8y ago
[deleted]

popotamonga 8y ago

Do people in the US take 15m to visit the pump?

frei 8y ago
No, it's usually more like 5 minutes
- stcredzero 8y ago
  When I'm on road trips with my friends, I can never get them out of a rest stop faster than 25 minutes. When I'm on the road with my wife, 15 minutes is about the right time.
  - SketchySeaBeast 8y ago
    Are you sitting at the pump the whole time?
    - stcredzero 8y ago
      In the case of my friends, I'm sitting at the pump or standing in the store texting my friends. In the case of my wife, I'm waiting for her to get out of the restroom.
  - Dylan16807 8y ago
    That's the time it takes to visit the convenience store. Relevant in some circumstances, but if you're not already in need of a break you only visit the pump and even five minutes is oddly slow. And the article and company site specifically say the time to fill the tank, not to visit a gas station. So they're blatantly lying.
    - stcredzero 8y ago
      For my personal situation, I can't fill the tank in under 25 minutes on road trips with my friends. So it works for me.

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]

choeger 8y ago

That sounds like a cry to be bought by the highest bidder. Just of the shelf hardware and some pixie dust, err, "AI". Sure thing they'll find some car company that will sink some millions into their company.

ianhowson 8y ago
Remember the Tesla insider that leaked a bunch of firmware and system details? https://twitter.com/atomicthumbs/status/1032939652393521156 https://twitter.com/atomicthumbs/status/1032939652393521156 If it's to believed, the charge rate limit from a Supercharger is already maxed out -- they're pushing energy into the battery as fast as the charger can supply it (and taking some safety risks in the process). This same company has been around for a few years with spurious claims about improving laptop battery life with their AI algorithms. So far nobody has seen evidence that it works, and nobody is lining up to buy them.

dkoston 8y ago

476mi/h of charging isn’t gorundbreaking. Aston Martin, Tesla and Porsche already charge at those speeds or faster. https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1118575_gm-working-on-ultra-fast-charging-system-for-chevy-bolt-ev https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1118575_gm-working-on-u... I believe their “secret sauce” is allowing existing packs which charge slower to get “up to speed”. If so, that’s a pretty limited market as it’s likely that within a few years, all EVs sold will charge faster than the listed speeds. They’ll likely have a maximum tota addressable market of a few hundred thousand cars with only a few thousand real consumers. Most people buying electric cars with slower chargers are doing so because those vehicles fit their lifestyle and wouldn’t have a massive incentive to buy a new charger.

timsher 8y ago
Hi! I'm one of the founders at GBatteries - I’ve partially answered this in another comment, so will copy paste portions. We've demonstrated 5 min to 50% charge, 10 min to 100% charge - below is a demo that we’ve done at CES 2019, and that we’re now exhibiting at the Detroit Auto show demonstrating this. [Video here: https://youtu.be/kSLrqR4TfnU https://youtu.be/kSLrqR4TfnU Note: Charging times can vary by ~1 minute here and there, because the algorithm is adaptive and characteristics of batteries change from moment to moment.] The problem with batteries today is not charging speed; it’s possible to charge any battery quickly, but the faster you charge a battery the faster it will degrade. Our technology is able to decrease the irreversible chemical reactions that happen during charging, so that the same batteries can be charged fast without compromising cycle life. We’re working on enabling existing packs to charge as fast as possible. We’re not able to fast charge at these levels without approval from the OEM as they have limits built-in. We need to either be integrated inside of the vehicle, or on the charger but have the vehicles "approval" for charging at these higher rates, as at Level 3 and up it's DC to the pack.
- dkoston 8y ago
  Thanks for the added clarity. Being able to charge from below 50% without damaging cycle life is huge. Would be great to see some cycle life charts showing GBatteries vs traditional chargers. One of the other challenges you may face is the lack of consumer knowledge about how charging affects cycle life. Since consumers tend to charge batteries in ways that dramatically reduce cycles, this is potentially huge. Figuring out how to create demand from consumers will be very important as OEMs don’t really have any motivation here. Cycle life isn’t published nor really considered by consumers when they buy devices with rechargeable batteries.

floatrock 8y ago

Super skeptical here, or at least the wording is misleading as hell. > The product allows users to charge a 60kWh EV battery pack with 119 miles of range in 15 minutes as compared to 15 miles in 15 minutes today. > The technology works with off-the-shelf lithium ion batteries and existing fast charge infrastructure by integrating via a patented self-contained adapter on a car charge port First read says that they're delivering 60kWh in 15min, or they're pumping electrons at 240kW. This is just nonsense -- most deployed DC fast chargers are 50kW... the charger companies and the OEMs are experimenting with 200kW chargers, but those are liquid cooled. So physics says this is nonsense. Okay, so second read: the 60 kWh is distracting technobabble, and what they're ACTUALLY doing is "adding 119 miles of range in 15 minutes." The just-announced Nissan Leaf e+ has a 62 kWh battery with 226 miles of range. When you DC Fast Charge, going from 0-80% takes about as much time as going from 80-100% (EV roadtripping is about doing frequent small charging because of this phenomenon, not one-time top-offs like with gas). The Nissan Leaf e+ is about a 60 kWh battery, and if they're adding "119 miles of range in 15 minutes", that's about half the Leaf's 226 mi range, so call it "30 kWh of charge in 15 min". That means they're charging at an average of 120kW. Okay, now we're back within the realm of physics. Note the Leaf e+'s (yet unreleased hardware) still only accepts a maximum of 100kW DC fast charging. I think jaguar has experimented with 150kW charging on the ipace (but again, liquid cooled cables). So they're saying they found a way to cycle fast charging and get about a 20% improvement in average charging rate from the current kinda-top-of-the-line tech, and only for the first 50% battery capacity. Not nothing, but hardly "as quickly as visiting the pump", especially since whatever tricks they use likely won't continue for the next 50% of the battery.

spullara 8y ago
Tesla superchargers also peak out at 120KW.
timsher 8y ago
Hi! I'm one of the founders at GBatteries, please let me try to clear that up. We've demonstrated 5 min to 50% charge, 10 min to 100% - I’ll edit this to include a demo that we’ve done at CES 2019, and that we’re now exhibiting at the Detroit Auto show demonstrating. [EDIT] Video here: https://youtu.be/kSLrqR4TfnU https://youtu.be/kSLrqR4TfnU Note: Charging times can vary by ~1 minute here and there, because the algorithm is adaptive and characteristics of batteries change from moment to moment. >First read says that they're delivering 60kWh in 15min, or they're pumping electrons at 240kW. This is just nonsense -- most deployed DC fast chargers are 50kW... the charger companies and the OEMs are experimenting with 200kW chargers, but those are liquid cooled. So physics says this is nonsense. >Okay, so second read: the 60 kWh is distracting technobabble, and what they're ACTUALLY doing is "adding 119 miles of range in 15 minutes." There’s a mistake in the article, in both cases it should be in 5 minutes; should be corrected shortly. In this example, we’re talking about a 60kWh battery with 238 miles of range (Chevy Bolt). Right now the car charges 90miles in 30 minutes, or 15 miles in 5 minutes because the manufacturer limits the charging rate for the batteries in order to preserve their life. Our technology can enable these Li-ion batteries to charge in 5 min to 50%, or 119 miles. This example assumes that the car goes to a fast charging station that has enough power to charge the vehicle in this time; fast charge infrastructure that’s currently being put up by companies like Ionity (350kW), Electrify America, or Charge Point (500kW capability). The problem with batteries today is not charging speed; it’s possible to charge any battery quickly, but the faster you charge a battery the faster it will degrade. Our technology is able to decrease the irreversible chemical reactions that happen during charging, so that the same batteries can be charged fast without compromising cycle life.

patejam 8y ago

This is a straight up lie right? My car (2017 Honda Accord) has a 500+ mile range on a tank of gas. It'd take over an hour to charge to 500 miles. Even at 15 minutes that's a lie. It takes no more than 2-3 minutes of actual pumping to fill my 500+ mile tank of gas.

dawnerd 8y ago
Can take 15 minutes+ in Oregon since we can't pump our own gas. But yeah, last road trip I got ~600 miles out of a full tank. This company has a loooong way to go if they want to compete with that.
- patejam 8y ago
  Even in Oregon (or NJ where I'm originally from), it takes longer because of stuff outside of the actual pumping. So if for some reason you're not allowed to charge your own car, it'd just move from 15 minutes to 30 minutes. Also in NJ it definitely doesn't take more than 5 extra minutes waiting for the attendant 95% of the time.
  - jerrysievert 8y ago
    depending on the station, and how many attendants are working, you can be up around 30 minutes. I've seen some very efficient stations that do a lot of turnaround, and some very inefficient stations that have 10 lanes of 6-8 cars per lane waiting. that said, even at a full tank, that's only 220 miles for me, so unless I'm leaving Oregon on a trip, a 15 minute charge sounds amazing. the good news is that I've not seen a charging station that had an attendant.
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
sundvor 8y ago
Came here to post exactly this. Misleading click baity headline; it doesn't take me much more than 2-3 minutes to fill up 55 litres of fuel to my 65 liter tank, for 700km+ range. (I'm not in the habit of running it dry!)

lgleason 8y ago

If a car's battery system is not set up for this kind of a charge rate (IE: it maxes at 7.2 amp 240 volt level 2), there is no way their system can just attach to your port and charge your car faster. There are on-board controllers etc. that are controlled (for good reason), by the car/manufacturer that would need to be bypassed.

frostyj 8y ago

Might be naive here, but isn't there some sort of limitation on the battery side as well?

nathanaldensr 8y ago

I hope people realize this "article" is nothing more than a PR puff piece.

snazz 8y ago

If this works as advertised, it’s super cool. However, my anecdotal experience suggests that things that charge faster heat up, and I know that my phone warms up significantly on with the “fast charger” it came with. Knowing that batteries are potentially very volatile and prone to exploding and leaking, how safe is this technology?

URSpider94 8y ago
All modern EV’s except the Leaf have liquid-cooled battery packs with active cooling from the radiator and the A/C compressor.

dsd 8y ago

Why don't we just do removable batteries?

hndamien 8y ago
Company would have to own the batteries, users have no incentive to treat them well. Tragedy of the commons.
- Wowfunhappy 8y ago
  How does one treat a battery poorly? I mean, I know in the abstract sense that it's ideal if they ever get fully drained and, but that's not all that catastrophic. I'd consider it normal use in most cases—if manufacturers don't want the charge to ever dip that low, they should make the battery stop working earlier.
  - hndamien 8y ago
    I presume you mean don't get fully drained. They also should not get fully charged either. They could make the battery stop working earlier and limit them from being filled, but this is going to limit a lot of one time use cases when the trade off is worthwhile.
    - Wowfunhappy 8y ago
      > They could make the battery stop working earlier and limit them from being filled, but this is going to limit a lot of one time use cases when the trade off is worthwhile. Which brings me back to my original question: how does one treat a battery poorly? Or perhaps more accurately, how would people treat batteries they rent more poorly than ones they own? In a world where consumers were highly cognizant of maintaining battery health, and only fully drained/charged their batteries when absolutely essential, I can see how rented batteries would be a problem. In practice, I doubt many consumers actually think about this, if they're even aware of it to begin with. Ergo, I don't forsee rented batteries dying significantly sooner than owned batteries, because most consumers aren't going to change their behavior.

jartelt 8y ago

Are there going to be any issues with peak demand charges from utilities making fast charging cost prohibitive? I have to imagine that pulling that much power from the grid will either be very expensive or will require some grid upgrades to prevent issues.

newman8r 8y ago

If you could recharge while waiting in line for fast food, that would eliminate the need to ever go to a 'gas station' at all. These guys should partner with sonic or something, drive-in style.

nikanj 8y ago

UBeam et al have demonstrated that flat out ignoring physics can be an extremely reliable way to raise funding and score press visibility. Here’s hoping this won’t end up on the same list.

kwhitefoot 8y ago

The obsession with fast charging is getting tiresome. Here in Norway we have more electric cars per head than anywhere else and most people wake up to a fully charged car. It is really rare to need to charge the car at a public charger unless you have nowhere off road to park your car. What is most needed in most places is somewhere to charge the car overnight or while you are at work. Such chargers need no new technology, no extra infrastructure beyond a simple socket in a post beside the road or in each parking space in car parks.

C1sc0cat 8y ago
A lot of countries are much denser and don't have off road parking where you can run a cooker circuit 415v to
gwbas1c 8y ago
Fast charging is needed for road trips, and for people who don't have access to a charger at home. (Think about people who rent or who need to park on the street)

gwbas1c 8y ago

> as compared to 15 miles in 15 minutes today. My Tesla Model 3 gets 75 miles in 15 minutes at the supercharger.