27 ms·
Show HN: Explore ideas whose patent protection expires today
- niko001 10y agoThe majority [1] of patents are never commercially exploited or licensed - I wanted a way to browse recently expired patents to find hidden gems and get inspired by existing inventions. The site uses the recently released USPTO-API [2] to fetch newly expired patents each day. NB: The reason the most recent patents displayed are from 12/31 is because no new patents were granted during the first few days of January 1997. [1] http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2014/06/18/13633/#799ec00c4183 http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2014/06/18/13633/#7... [2] http://www.patentsview.org/api http://www.patentsview.org/api
- joe_fro 10y agoGreat work with this, I can see it providing me hours of entertainment. Obligatory what's the stack?
- niko001 10y agoThanks, I'm glad you like it :) I've kept it really simple - the patentsview.org API spits out JSON, which I'm feeding into the (awesome!) DataTables jQuery-plugin. The site is hosted on GitHub Pages. I'm planning a HN-style voting system so that interesting patents trickle to the top.
- joe_fro 10y agoAre you planning on having a feature to pick a range of days, so that I can seen what expired over the last week?
- logicallee 10y ago2017, when "really simple" is a jQuery plugin. ;)
- eriknstr 10y agoSimple from a development point of view.
- halomru 10y agoAfter all, right now the perceived norm is to send all your 100Mb/day of data through a kafkaesk array of message queues, stream processors and map-reduce jobs.
- nathancahill 10y agoGotta have that sweet sweet Big Data.
- TeMPOraL 10y agoI just had a cow-orker ask me if I know any Angular, because he wants to display a single value in browser from a sensor attached to Raspberry Pi. So yes, jQuery plugin is pretty damn simple for 2017.
- gr3yh47 10y agodatatables is fantastic, almost always a better solution than native html tables for any non-trivial information display
- activatedgeek 10y agoThis is amazing work! I wonder if you've been actively using patents as your source of ideas? It seems like an unnatural path to go down, looking for ideas.
- agumonkey 10y agoDoing god's work.
- fizixer 10y ago- So no one can re-patent the expired patents? - If you build and sell a product based on one of these, you don't have to worry about getting sued? (but at the same time you have no protection against cheap clones of your product either?)
- ReedJessen 10y ago"So no one can re-patent the expired patents?" Correct. To get a new patent, your invention by novel and unobvious. If it has been patented before, it will not be novel when attempting to "re-patent" it. Therefore, re-patenting is not possible.
- mcherm 10y agoFurthermore, lots of things are considered "not novel" or "obvious" by nearly every expert in the field, but not by patent examiners. But one specific area which patent examiners are VERY good at reviewing is old patents. So re-patenting old patented inventions becomes impossible, not only in theory but in practice also.
- ska 10y agoIt's not that they are very good at it - it's that this is typically all they are going to be looking at. They're also better (and have better tools) at searching patent databases than nearly anyone who doesn't do this daily.
- pbhjpbhj 10y ago>this is typically all they are going to be looking at. // Are you referring to the USPTO there, do you have a source?
- ska 10y agoJust going by what several specialists (e.g. patent agents, ex examiners) have told me independently. It does match my experience in office actions with many different examiners, for whatever that's worth.
- wetherbeei 10y agoI run Google Patents (patents.google.com) - we've thought about including a way to search by expired patents (we have the expiration indicators), but in my opinion it gives a false sense of security. There's also http://freeip.mtu.edu/home/index.php http://freeip.mtu.edu/home/index.php, which searches over only expired patents. The patent in question could have been improved upon, and that improvement can still be in force. Say someone patents a widget A + B, and later files a continuation A + B + C (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuing_patent_application https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuing_patent_application). The first patent could be expired, but while building your copy of A + B you might come to the same conclusion that the invention also needs to include C (which is still in force) to actually work. Google Patents focuses on improving patent quality. There's still uncertainty if a granted patent is actually valid. If we can improve the prior art finding process for inventors and examiners, then fewer overly-broad patents will be granted, and it will be easier to tell if an invention actually infringes a patent. Then we can start to think about making patent information more useful for part of the original purpose - as a transfer of knowledge to the public domain in exchange for a temporary exclusive right.
- iplaw 10y agoYou run Google Patents? Where is the comment jar?
- amelius 10y agoYes, it would be great if patents could have user comments associated with them. (The same can be said for publications in google scholar, perhaps you could pass it on to the appropriate team)
- ww520 10y agoThank you for the great work. It's very useful.
- blackflame7000 10y agoGreat insight on continuing patent applications. I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment that overly broad patents, particularly with respect to technology, need serious review. It is way too easy to patent a concept instead of an invention. An example to illustrate my point is a patent such as this: http://www.google.com/patents/US20140244001 http://www.google.com/patents/US20140244001 Which basically says, I haven't actually invented anything useful, but if anyone else does they should have to pay me because I thought of something super generic first.
- gist 10y agoThis would be even more helpful if you could do X days in advance of expiration rather than day of expiration.
- agumonkey 10y agoI posted your site on reddit, someone is complaining that many patents are renewed and potentially not listed on your site. https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/5lta71/patentsexpiringtodaycom_find_patents_that_expired/dbycphk/ https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/5lta71/patentse... If you can do something about it it's cool otherwise well, still not bad.
- impostervt 10y agoI was randomly clicking and found this one: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588162 https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588162 The Legal events at the bottom says it expired in 2001. Seems strange?
- niko001 10y agoThanks for the feedback :)! The patent in question was granted on 1996-12-31, which means it should have expired on 2016-12-31. The status on Google Patents says "Expired - Fee Related" so I'm guessing they didn't pay a required fee somewhere down the line?
- taejo 10y agoUnlike copyrights, patents don't have an invariable lifetime: they have to be renewed, usually for an increasing fee. In the US, the schedule of maintenance fees is: (A) Three years and 6 months after grant, $980. (B) Seven years and 6 months after grant, $2,480. (C) Eleven years and 6 months after grant, $4,110. This allows patents that are not being profitably exploited to lapse early.
- tgb 10y agoI had no idea, thanks for sharing this.
- cr0sh 10y ago> This allows patents that are not being profitably exploited to lapse early It also allows larger companies to sit back, and wait out small inventors to "give up" on a patent (due to it becoming too expensive to renew) that they are trying to sell to these same companies. You might ask, though, why would somebody invent something that they didn't then market and manufacture themselves? Well - it happens, more often than not: Some inventions are created by hard work, sometimes at a large expense to a lone inventor, sometimes not, or a prototype or model can be made to illustrate the invention (which I don't think is a requirement anymore (?), but used to be) - but a full-scale implementation is beyond the inventor's finances or capabilities. So they try to shop the patent around to companies or investors to get it to market. Sometimes, they succeed - and they sell it or otherwise license it out - and make a lot of money in the process. But often, these other parties just elect to "wait it out" - for the whole 20 years of the potential patent life if needed. In other words, rather than help someone else gain from their hard work and idea(s), and bring something to fill a possible need to market, they would rather "save that money" and wait it out - then when it expires, suddenly "bring a new device" to the market (perhaps even with their own extra patented bits attached to foil others!). All of this is legal, of course - nothing says these companies -must- purchase or license patents - but I personally find it a distasteful side-effect. I posted another comment earlier on this - about something which happened in a similar manner to my brother-in-law. In his case, his up-front costs consisted of not only creating prototypes, but also having to create them by having a company manufacture plastic injection-molding molds for these prototypes - this wasn't cheap then, and still isn't cheap today. Today, though, it would be easier and cheaper for him to just 3D print his prototypes - but that wasn't the case back in the 1970s when he was working on his invention. Between those costs, and the costs to patent and renew the patent over its life, he only broke even (roughly) after settling out-of-court with Bell when we found them infringing on the patent by importing infringing devices from a Chinese-based company (we were in a Walmart one day, and saw them being sold in the store).
- swalsh 10y agoFellow hackers, a word of advice... always start with the marketing before building a product. I too think a power actuated toilet seat sounds like a fantastic foundation for a business, but it's what the market things... not what your gut thinks.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- ffjffsfr 10y agoI'm trying to understand what it does by looking at pictures and reading this description but I have no idea: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588162 https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588162 is it just raising and lowering toilet seat based on input? So I can sit on toilet manipulate some handle and it will lower my seat level?
- justusthane 10y ago> 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates generally to devices for assisting infirm or injured individuals to move from a standing position to a sitting position and from a sitting position to a standing position. More particularly, the instant invention is directed to a toilet seat which is configured to assist infirm individuals in lowering themselves to and raising themselves from the sitting position.
- JoshuaRedmond 10y agoSounds like a toilet version of a riser chair such as [0], which I could see being really useful for people. [0] - http://stairlift-suppliers.co.uk/mobility-aids/riser-recliner-chairs/ http://stairlift-suppliers.co.uk/mobility-aids/riser-recline... (no association with them whatsoever, just first site I found)
- cr0sh 10y agoI would be willing to bet that the inventor thought the same - "hey, here's a perfect invention - I'll be rich" - he might have even built a working prototype in his garage. Then he spent $$$$ on getting the patent - this isn't cheap - my brother-in-law went thru this, and getting a lawyer and such, having it drawn up, written properly...it cost him $25k easily... ...and then this inventor probably shopped it around to the various mobility equipment companies. All of them likely said "no". It wouldn't surprise me to find that one or more of them came out with (or imported) a similar "invention"! That happened with my brother-in-law's invention... Regardless, now these device manufacturers - if they haven't already - are possibly all scrambling to be the first to market with such an "invention", and hailing it as a welcome and needed innovation for the elderly and infirm. They'll make a ton of money off of it. None of it will go to the inventor, and 20 years have passed where more than one person could have used this, and probably died in the meantime wishing for something like this every time they went to the restroom. Don't say this is a fanciful flight - it happens; it happened with my brother-in-law. Toyota infringed on it, but he didn't have the money to fight it. He did manage to get Bell from importing an infringing device (settled out of court). Ultimately, what he gained barely covered what he spent over the years. This is how the patent game is played in some regard: If the "little guy" patents it, he doesn't get anything, unless he manages to market and produce it himself. Large players or other companies aren't interested, they can just "wait" - or go ahead and infringe and the original inventor can't do anything. Unless that inventor is another large company. It's a very frustrating system for the lone guy working in his garage; it's no wonder that many of these guys just release things as open-source hardware, or in some other similar fashion. They know that if they don't, it will never get produced. If they try to produce it, Chinese manufacturers will copy it and sell it in no time. If they patent it, they'll spend a ton of money, and gain nothing - or large companies will just outsource it and import it, or infringe in other ways - or just sit on it, and wait for the patent to run out. I wish it were different - but that's our patent system - it doesn't reward the small guy any longer. On a different note - something that I wish could be automated would be a tool or something to help properly write patents. If you read enough of them, you realize that they have a very special, very convoluted "language" and "syntax" - specifically designed (?) to detail the invention and construction thereof of the invention, while detailing how it is fundamentally different from similar devices, how it improves upon them, and how each part works and interacts with other parts. It seems like something that could be automated - or at least computer assisted? As it stands, to get these written requires experts in the field, patent attorneys, copy writers, etc - it isn't something an ordinary person can easily do without a ton of study (and they will likely get it wrong, causing the patent to be rejected, or worse - to pass with a ton of holes in it that can be exploited). As such, it is part of the process that makes getting a patent very expensive (the government fees and such are small potatoes - that isn't what makes getting a patent expensive, but rather the need for technical patent copy writers and drafting specialists for drawings).
- warriorkitty 10y agoYou get interesting things when you type Linux[0]. [0] - https://patents.google.com/?q=linux https://patents.google.com/?q=linux
- adtac 10y agoQuestion: Aren't Android phones a violation of this [0]? [0] - https://patents.google.com/patent/US20040244008A1/en?q=linux https://patents.google.com/patent/US20040244008A1/en?q=linux
- dsp1234 10y agoUsing the instructions I previously provided on how to investigate patents[0], it can be seen that this is a patent application (not an actual patent), and its status is "Abandoned -- Failure to Respond to an Office Action" after a non-final rejection in 2008. This doesn't say anything about whether or not they refiled or not, just that this application was abandoned, and never granted. So save some trouble, the application number is "10/797557" Edit: Even more context. This application was rejected on claims 1-4 due to "rejected under 35 USC 102(b) as being anticipated by IBM RedBook, 'Linux For S/360', 2000", and claim 5 is rejected under 35 USC 102(c) from the same source. [0] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12981882 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12981882
- soneca 10y agoAn expired patent is of public domain or it is just free to be patented again by another person?
- dhosek 10y agoPublic domain.
- jaclaz 10y agoIt's public domain, see also: http://patents.stackexchange.com/questions/5766/is-an-expired-patent-in-the-public-domain http://patents.stackexchange.com/questions/5766/is-an-expire... The idea of a patent is that for a given number of years your invention is protected, even if public, you cannot re-patent it "as is" (as it would not be anymore new or non-obvious) but you can sometimes patent a derivative (like an improvement of the same base idea). The generic issue may be that often behind something there can be a number of patents, often interlinked, so it is far from easy to determine whether you can "use" that expired patent.
- orionblastar 10y agoWould that apply to very old technology like 8-bit CPUs and support chips? Would it apply to old operating systems like CP/M? I heard of some people making a toy that had expired patents on it that was a hit in the 1970s or 1980s like Rubics Cube, Mood Rings, Tinker Toys, etc.
- jandrese 10y agoThe whole point of the patent system is to make sure ideas aren't locked up so we can advance as a society (something the Copyright office has forgotten), so once they expire they are in the Public Domain forever.
- logicallee 10y agoThis is not the only point of the patent system: you seem to think that any good patents could have been kept as trade secrets. But that's not the case. Sometimes there would be no way to use a patent as a trade secret, because, for example, it's simply given to the consumer and they can see how it works, easily. So another important point is to allow people to research and innovate and make it to market under a state-granted monopoly, in exchange for and to encourage doing so. As an example, suppose there existed a configuration of plastic that easily enabled xyz - but nobody has 'invented' or researched this configuration. If there really is no prior art, then someone could take the time to invent and patent it, and then sell it at a price that both recoups the cost of their invention, and also acts as an incentive for them to have done so in the first place. This is not theoretical. The cable tie is a great invention. Here's what Wikipedia has to say about it: >The idea of the cable tie came to Logan while touring a Boeing aircraft manufacturing facility in 1956. Aircraft wiring was a cumbersome and detailed undertaking, involving thousands of feet of wire organized on sheets of 50-foot long plywood and held in place with knotted, waxcoated, braided nylon cord. Each knot had to be pulled tight by wrapping the cord around one's finger which sometimes cut the operator's fingers until they developed thick calluses or "hamburger hands." Logan was convinced there had to be an easier, more forgiving, way to accomplish this critical task. >For the next couple of years, Logan experimented with various tools and materials. On June 24, 1958, a patent for the Ty-Rap cable tie was submitted. In other words (if I'm reading it right) from 1958 until 1978 he had a monopoly on making those cheap plastic things. Then it was over. Today, (and for the past 45 years) everyone could make that piece of plastic easily and cheaply. Bu the KEY thing is "For the next couple of years, Logan experimented with various tools and materials. " -- THAT'S what the patent system enables. He would have had zero incentive to do so if he had not had a patent on the invention, for the next few years. People might have "hamburger hands", to this day. Trade secret has nothing to do with it.
- bencollier49 10y ago"Mole Gassing Device"- https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588252 https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588252 Brilliant stuff.
- ctdonath 10y agoBetter mousetrap: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588249 https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588249
- nashashmi 10y agoThis is one of the better written patents I have seen.
- Retr0spectrum 10y agoThe mechanism is massively overcomplicated. It almost looks like a joke.
- wlesieutre 10y agoIt looks like the design goal was "How can I turn a traditional mousetrap into a humane mousetrap?" There would be more efficient ways to build the same product from scratch, but it's a fun thought experiment.
- kuschku 10y agoThere’s far simpler, already existing humane mouse traps. Where you have a small cage with an opening at one side, the opening as door pulled up against a spring which would push it down, and then locked with a lever. If the mouse touches the cheese, the spring-release of that activates the lever of the door, and traps the mouse in. https://www.knauber-freizeit.de/mam/celum/celum_assets/8804179476510_05340_5801_jpg.jpg https://www.knauber-freizeit.de/mam/celum/celum_assets/88041...
- brndn 10y ago
- donquichotte 10y agoI can't believe that this was a patent [1]. Surgical gown? Really? In 1995? A suit with a ventilator? [1] https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588153 https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588153
- was_boring 10y agoHow about this one, a shirt with reflective material on it! https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588156 https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588156
- donquichotte 10y agoThis patent, owned by George S. Panton, Jr., also includes Pants. Edit: Mr. Panton, firmly rooted in the clothing industry, has other inventions, like this spandex necktie: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4839925A/en?inventor=George+S.+Panton%2c+Jr https://patents.google.com/patent/US4839925A/en?inventor=Geo....
- miguelrochefort 10y agoIs it just me (it's not) or are 80% of these fairly trivial? Patents don't make sense when you think about it.
- donquichotte 10y agoI thought the same. It's interesting that this kind of comment gets downvoted without explanation. Is there some kind of culture on HN that implicitly forbids us to voice criticism?
- kl4m 10y agoIt's not constructive, at all. "When you think about it"? Well, I tought about it, and patents are useful for their stated purpose.
- st3v3r 10y agoThey seem trivial now, 20 some odd years after the fact.
- miguelrochefort 10y agoI once wanted to build a system, and decided to browse through patents. I realized that my system would easily infringe 100+ of patents. Many of them were actually very recent.
- traviswingo 10y agoThis is a great idea! There are undoubtedly many great solutions to be found through here that were either before their time, or simply ignored after filing. Great work!
- zackmorris 10y agoComing soon: the sister site softwarepatentsborntoday.com listing all software patents starting today that will stifle innovation for the next 17 years
- cr0sh 10y agoI have to say I like this; personally, it will probably just be entertainment for me (like I need more distractions), but I can easily see it being useful for others. Great job! One suggestion - can you put the page selector at the top of the list as well (and maybe add an option to allow more than 10 items on the list)? That was just a small thing I noticed...
- SixSigma 10y agoTime for some word2vec to explore them without having to crawl through them manually
- ReedJessen 10y agoIP Street's got you covered. Semantic patent search as an api service.
- ISL 10y agoThis IBM patent is practical and viable: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588199 https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588199
- dsp1234 10y agoIt also expired at the end of 2000 https://fees.uspto.gov/MaintenanceFees/fees/details?applicationNumber=08339523&patentNumber=5588199 https://fees.uspto.gov/MaintenanceFees/fees/details?applicat...
- benjyclay 10y agoAwesome site, this is the best one today. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588175 https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588175 Word of warning, privacy services like Privacy Badger and Decentraleyes block the data tables cdn your using so your users using those services see no data at all
- entwife 10y agoFoot vacuum, interesting. The patents expiring today website seems to have a simple view of patent expiry, based on 20 years from publication date. The legal expiry date is more complex, and often much earlier. The patent owner is required to pay maintenance fees [1]. Google patents shows this information under "Legal Events". In this patent, the owner allowed the patent to lapse after 3 years, but eventually petitioned the office for reinstatement and paid the tolls for the 3rd and 7th years. One might expect that this patent term actually expired 11 years after filing, in 2006. Some patents are given a patent term adjustment (extension) based on administrative delay not caused by patentee. Other patents have their expiry tied to another patent by terminal disclaimer. The USPTO provides a calculator (Excel spreadsheet, meh) for calculating, and additional explanations. [2]. This patent doesn't appear to be subject to term extension or terminal disclaimer. This patent's term is more complex because the Uruguay Rounds Agreement Act significantly changed the rules for patent terms, for patents filed after June 7, 1995. This patent falls into one of the exceptions. This is described somewhat in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure section 2701. [3] The original website is a very interesting concept. It could be even more interesting by incorporating more rules about patent expiry, allowing filters on patents allowed to go expired, patents that were revived, and so on. It would require incorporating additional information from the USPTO Public Pair database. [1] https://www.uspto.gov/patents-maintaining-patent/maintain-your-patent#General%20Information https://www.uspto.gov/patents-maintaining-patent/maintain-yo... [2]https://www.uspto.gov/patent/laws-and-regulations/patent-term-calculator https://www.uspto.gov/patent/laws-and-regulations/patent-ter... [3] https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2701.html https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2701.html
- monochromatic 10y agoYou're quite right--determining a patent's expiration date in the general case is a very involved inquiry. And even after it appears to be expired for failure to pay maintenance fees, it can sometimes be revived...
- ijidak 10y agoThis is epic. Love it. I'm going to share this with others. I see this as a great way to learn about patents in general, and as a way to get inspiration for new ideas. I've always found patents fascinating, even if they're a little over-hyped as a business moat. Ask Apple. Have any of their ideas from their beginning until now, not been copied? Windows GUI vs Mac OS GUI, iPhone vs Galaxy, Android vs iOS. But I still think patents are at least stimulating to read and apply for. It's proof of invention, which I still think is pretty cool and useful.
- modeless 10y agoThis is a great way to find ideas that have all their obvious improvements covered by newer patents, and get sued anyway.
- raheemm 10y agoI like this one - backpack vacuum cleaner. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588177 https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588177
- jefe_ 10y agoI'm pretty sure the people who clean my office use one of these...
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- catcar 10y agoThose shoes were actually great: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588227 https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588227
- krussell 10y agoHa, I also liked those shoes. Looks like the patent for the competing Reebok Pump also expired a few years ago: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5113599A https://patents.google.com/patent/US5113599A . It's interesting to see that LA Gear filed for their Regulators patent 1 month before Reebok was granted the Pump patent.
- mring33621 10y agoNow I can safely launch my "decorative stone encrusted zipper teeth" [1] startup! [1] https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588185 https://patents.google.com/patent/US5588185
- tropo 10y agoThis exists. My wife had one of those zippers on a white overshirt/sweater thing. It actually looked nice. It matched the drawings exactly.
- blizkreeg 10y agoDoes anyone think there are viable/profitable business ideas in there? If the original inventors didn't bother to build something out of it, I wonder if it's because the patents themselves are "good thought experiments" or if the inventors lacked the business wherewithal to make it happen.
- a1a 10y agoMost definitely. In my experience ideas are rarely valuable by themselves. Rather an idea is valuable when implemented by someone who have what it takes to see it through. Simply put, not a lot of people have what it takes just because they filed a patent.
- takingflac 10y agoAt least the ideas are put on record and able to be accessed by someone who could see it through once the patent has expired, which fortunately is a reasonable amount of time.
- blackflame7000 10y agoSometimes the idea can be good, but the originator isn't capable of turning it into more. As just about any VC will tell you, the idea is just step 1.
- jamesfisher 10y agoIs there an analogous service for copyrighted works? "Explore books whose copyright expires today"?
- icebraining 10y agoUnfortunately, if you live in the US, the answer is nothing: https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/publicdomainday/2017/pre-197 https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/publicdomainday/2017/pre-197 "no published works will enter our public domain until 2019."
- incredulousk 10y agoFinally, after years of stifling innovation, the power actuated toilet seat is public domain.
- amelius 10y agoI actually want to explore patents whose protection expires in the time I need to implement them. Perhaps 6 months would be a good compromise.
- shanemhansen 10y agoHuh. Work firewall won't let me access. I'm assuming that the problem is the domain: "patent sex piringtoday.com".
- sxates 10y agoGood idea - perhaps you should patent it!
- trizic 10y agoI had thought of doing something like this. I thought it would be great to have countdowns for popular patents such as the one Apple uses for MagSafe, as these would mark dates of "freedom" that would benefit the consumer.
- kumarski 10y agoI'm so curious, what's your lead source/ is there a USPTO API feed that you're parsing?
- ReedJessen 10y agoCheck out IPStreet.com
- kumarski 10y ago<3
- ReedJessen 10y agoCheck out IPStreet.com
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- ronenlh 10y agoI thought all domain names with the word "sex" in them were already taken.