znafelrif

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by znafelrif 3y ago

   The article doesnt say anything about the JVM accessing other processes memory though.
2. 2.▲
   by znafelrif 3y ago

   Doesn't ChatGPT probably regurgitate stackoverflow answers? If stackoverflow doesn't exist, ChatGPT probably also gets worse as it doesn't have the data necessary to be able to answer questions.
3. 3.▲
   by znafelrif 3y ago

   > The core of functional programming is about avoiding mutable states, not much about anonymous functions or passing functions as data. I disagree since any paradigm can be done either with or without mutable state. So it is not somethin
4. 4.▲
   by znafelrif 3y ago

   The things it points out seem rather small and nitpicky. Doesn't really support the negative summary of the article.
5. 5.▲
   by znafelrif 3y ago

   Do you have an example of such an implementation in haskell?
6. 6.▲
   by znafelrif 3y ago

   > > The interpreter uses very dubious implementation decisions, and the language that is created as a side-effect makes reasoning about anything near impossible. That is in my opinion just completely unconstructive hate that I would n
7. 7.▲
   by znafelrif 4y ago

   The article actually mentions ease-of-use as the major downside of functional programming ("Functional programming has a steep learning curve")
8. 8.▲
   by znafelrif 4y ago

   The properties mentioned in the article are not really tied to functional programming. - Not allowing null-references can be done with any paradigm. For example with object-oriented programming there really is no reason why it wouldn't