> > The interpreter uses very dubious implementation decisions, and the language that is created as a side-effect makes reasoning about anything near impossible

> > The interpreter uses very dubious implementation decisions, and the language that is created as a side-effect makes reasoning about anything near impossible. That is in my opinion just completely unconstructive hate that I would not take serious as criticism. It doesn't give any concrete things that could be improved and instead just gives some vague statement about the whole site being generally bad.