Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zip1234
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
241.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
You used 1/2mv^2? It is 2.64 times the energy. Squared means it is increasing exponentially
242.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
In England it is legal as long as the walker determines it is safe to do so.
243.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
Perhaps because 65 has exponentially more energy in collisions and more likely to cause death? If it is limited to 40, death is less likely and therefore chance of negative news. So I would venture just a risk calculation for initial releas
244.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
The fact is that loads of people drive drunk, drive illegally, and drive dangerously--on public roads. Police enforcement clearly doesn't work. Automated enforcement would. Why should people get to endanger others? The leading cause of
245.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
20mph is within populated areas and not on a main road. In the US, the norm is 25mph, which isn't that far off.
246.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
I think Marketplace quickly became a goto over Craigslist because a Facebook profile is much more trustworthy than the essential anonymity of Craigslist.
247.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
Also when everyone moves to the countryside it isn't really the rural countryside anymore. It is just sprawl.
248.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
Does pitting these teams directly against each other to achieve a specific purpose advance the field better than letting them do their normal research thing?
249.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
The counterpoint is that you have the exact same decisions being made in systems like the UK. People get refused cancer treatment because they were too old and their were younger patients that had a better prognosis. The fact is both types
250.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
From what I can tell, this is just to keep money in the hands of lawyers and keep prices high. There are plenty of things that could be done better now by non-lawyers with the help of lawyers (look at Rocket law).
251.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
The problem is often that people want to live in a place that is cheap and with space and then drive to where jobs are and the pay is high (city), which means wide roads to get to city, which means lots of pollution, noise, lack of safety f
252.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
There are absolutely great rail links to London. From nearly every direction. Drive your car to one of those places, buy a travelcard and you're all set.
253.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
1. There is a difference between luxury apartments and new apartments. 2. More likely the most egregious wasted land uses will be destroyed and not something already being used fairly productively. For example empty lots or parking lots ar
254.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
Maybe at the extremes there will be an issue, but doing all those things would massively bring down prices.
255.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
Land value tax would prevent people from buying land without a plan to make it useful. IE ending land speculation and encouraging productive uses of land.
256.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
A price spike, maybe. A long term unending price increase, no. Would love to see an example of a place that doesn't have such constraints on building that has high prices.
257.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
Favorable conditions such as the F-35 being parked on the ramp and the Cessna crashes into it?
258.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
The US has 2 squadrons of F-35s in Alaska.
259.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
I saw some tanker on twitter explaining just how bad the Russian tactics with their tanks are. Poor training, poor logistics, and undermanned. Tanks get such poor gas mileage that they need tons of support. Extremely effective weapons when
260.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
I thought they fixed that already--software tweak for a sensor.
261.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
F-35 would do exceptionally well in this conflict. It is designed for contested airspace.
262.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
The most expensive real estate per sq foot in the world and they allow people to store personal cars for free on the street. Ludicrous
263.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
I mean, only 15% of Manhattan population owns a car.
264.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
Seems like the person walking may be waiting a very long time then.
265.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
In a right turn on green scenario, the driver mainly needs to be looking for pedestrians crossing and they will be crossing a different direction. In a right turn on red, their primary focus is on cars, limiting their attention on pedestria
266.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
Only on bigger roads. Not very safe for pedestrians.
267.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
How would yield signs would be better for pedestrians and pedestrian safety?
268.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
Right turn on red really doesn't belong anywhere where people could be on the street. Drivers turning red will often pull forward into the crosswalk and there may be a walk signal.
269.
▲
by
zip1234
4y ago
Sure, they are not ideal. They are there because changing road design for safety is expensive and not something that engineers in the US seem to understand how to do. Removing stop signs doesn't magically solve anything. Road design ne
270.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Learned about iberian gauge while taking a train in Portugal last month. The tracks were further apart than any that I have ever seen. Rail is much more complicated than people might think
More ›