Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zip1234
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
32 ms
·
331.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Yes, the funny thing is that because cities allow so many cars in the city center, congestion, pollution, and noise are everywhere, which makes people want to move to the suburbs, which means they have to drive to get anywhere, which makes
332.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Countries with public health care have problems with health care as well. It is not a silver bullet. The incentives are different but it is still an incentive driven system.
333.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
It is widely accepted that driving a dangerous machine that endangers the lives of others is a privilege and responsibility that comes with restrictions.
334.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
The main purpose as I understand it is that it allows poorer students to go to the nicer schools. In the US, the schools that are 'good' are all in expensive areas.
335.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
You could safely get rid of most of those things if you made the car go no faster than say 25mph. Just put speed limiters on them and the crash speeds will go way down as will the design requirements.
336.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
They are people who think their neighborhood should never change after they move in.
337.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
The main problem is Seattle/California engineers can make way more than Ann Arbor, although pay seems to be trending up.
338.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Seems like that is only European cars: https://usa.streetsblog.org/2020/04/28/vehicle-safety-standa...
339.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Other categories not tested for--how do people outside the vehicle fare? How do occupants of another vehicle fare?
340.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Except in many places pedestrians and cyclists have no choice but to share the road with cars and I don't see too many people clamoring for speed limiters on those...
341.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
They are not the problem with residential real estate prices. The real problem is people that prevent additional housing from being built.
342.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
The real benefit is that it gets people out of owning a car. The less people with cars, the more sensible decisions will be made. How many poor citymaking decisions are because of 'parking'? It is probably the number one concern o
343.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Better insulation such as compressed cellulose will beat a 10 foot air gap any day.
344.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Agreed. All of the above. The garage in front thing has a name as well 'snout house' as it looks like it has a snout.
345.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
I get your point, but you don't have to be rich to get away with killing someone with a car. Double the speed limit in a residential area, kills kid, acquitted: https://www.kmov.com/news/former-st-louis-county-offi
346.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
I wish sprawl was addressed in the US. New housing is definitely needed but it seems like the cheapest way to do it is always expanding ever outward in car-dependent suburbs. We need to price externalities of car use yesterday.
347.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Look at this: https://ourworldindata.org/crop-yields The yields/unit area go up and to the right, which means two things. One is that we need less land for agriculture, which frees it up for other purposes, including a
348.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
They just lowered it in Paris to 30km/h. Lower speed is directly correlated with less crashes. The other benefit is less noise, which is very important in an urban area. In most urban areas now the loudest most constant noise is from v
349.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
More like 'parents won't let kid ride more than block from their house'. And so we get stuff like this: https://www.engadget.com/little-tikes-smart-stationary-bike-...
350.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Perhaps if she is struck then the drivers were going too fast? Maybe the speed limit should be lowered. Perhaps the street could be designed in a safer way to make this less likely to happen. Calling everything an accident is ignoring the
351.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Any solution requires political will. The simplest, easiest, highest likelihood of success solution is a pollution (carbon) tax. If it started small and ramped up a little each year, people may not even notice too much.
352.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
The .NET Foundation board doesn't even all work for MS.
353.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
I have both an electric car and a Chevy Silverado 4x4 truck. My electric car has a $450 registration fee every year. My truck is only $130.
354.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
DNS?
355.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Let's say that Facebook was killed off by the government. Does that mean no more social networks? The problems that were 'leaked' are public problems that any such company at scale deals with. They are problems that banning F
356.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
"Changing the tires on a moving vehicle" but the moving vehicle is one of those road trains in Australia with 50 tires.
357.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
In almost any area with high demand, the prices are almost as high as California. The same zoning restrictions are everywhere.
358.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
None of those fix the root causes of the problem. Root causes: - zoning restrictions - parking minimums (also perhaps a subcategory of zoning)
359.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Wow, had not seen that before--$1200 for a new car is incredible.
360.
▲
by
zip1234
5y ago
Would make everywhere so much quieter, less polluted, and more pleasant.
More ›