Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ziddoap
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
121.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
I'm having trouble understanding how 1 company paying 1 salary for 1 position makes money for the 8-12 people described in the process above.
122.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
Correct. Subtitle is " [..] 100 accounts were compromised for over a year. "
123.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
> you'd have all those man pages loaded in context for it to answer Or I can just go to DDG/Google, and be done with it. No need to pre-load my "search engine" with context to get results.
124.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
Knowing that it is possible is different than having the tools, having the expertise, and wanting to take the time to do it for a random HNer. There are several papers on the topic if you're that interested.
125.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
If Visa has it, the government simply needs to ask for it. There's a difference, but it's not much of one.
126.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
> But excel just incorrectly determines what you meant How would you, if you were programming excel, determine whether the 5-digit number entered with a leading 0 is meant to be a zip code or not?
127.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
> there's never backstory given There's no backstory that justifies indefinite detention without due process.
128.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
Thanks! Curious to dig into it over the weekend.
129.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
> But I do not like bad studies. Can you share your link to the study & data? I'd like to determine if it is a "bad study" myself. I looked at the links in the article and it doesn't seem to have the study.
130.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
The middle tier says "€5".
131.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
To you, sure. To others, maybe not. Whether something is expensive (in money or time) is relative.
132.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
In the legal sense? I'm not sure. In the corporate day-to-day? Absolutely.
133.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
Could be great for augmenting a cybersec professional's tasks; I'm certainly interested in trying it. However, I fear it will not be used as just one of the tools in the toolbox, and rather it will be used as something to defer
134.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
Right into the ad hominem, fantastic debate tactic. Very dialectic of you. The irony of saying "maybe you'll figure out how to have a real debate." after a string of personal attacks is *chef's kiss*. > yet you comp
135.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
Unraveling it by creating your own? Maybe we can have a strawman party after.
136.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
They didn't say it was the same. You're arguing with what you imagined they said.
137.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
gumroad.com does not say what it does. It's a list of products being sold. You have to navigate to the About page, then scroll about 1/4 of the way until you can get an idea of what it is. Is it hard? No, of course not. It's
138.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
> god we are so spoiled. Is it really "spoiled" to say it'd be convenient for maybe a one-liner at the top of the file that's supposed to explain stuff about the project? > you have plenty of resources to get cont
139.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
> "changing your opinion means inviting mockery of past comments being dug up to be flung at you. " This has to be one of the most damaging things about social media, in my opinion. I never really understood why changing your m
140.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
"I was wrong" is really hard to say at the best of times. I sometimes struggle with it when I make a little mistake at work. Trying to say "I was wrong" after years of making your whole life, social circle, etc. about wh
141.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
As the sibling commenter mentions, QuickBooks Enterprise is completely distinct from QuickBooks Online, with very different feature sets. QuickBooks Enterprise is not going anywhere, at least any time soon.
142.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
> But at this point you're not really engaging in good faith if that's your argument. Can we not do that ? Can we not say people aren't conversing in good faith solely as a method of shutting down further conversation? Th
143.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
> Why is the existence of the largest games on the market's survival proof thst Steam doesn't own 90% marketshare? It's proof that what the parent commenter said, the portion I explicitly quoted, is an exaggeration. >
144.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
Can't wait until Linux supports QuickBooks, SolidWorks, and the other software I need. (Maybe I need to clarify that this isn't sarcasm? If I could run QuickBooks and SolidWorks on Linux, I would be switching several dozen PCs to
145.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
I think Microsoft gets a bit more hate than they deserve here, but the whole Microsoft account thing is actually absurd, to the point it's almost offensive. Please Microsoft, just let me use a local account on my PC. Either leave this
146.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
> If you're a game dev, small or big it doesn't matter, and your game isn't on Steam, it might as well not exist That's an exaggeration. World of Warcraft, COD, League of Legends, all exist just fine. For brand new g
147.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
How do you qualify them as a monopoly? I have 3 different non-Steam game stores and another 3 or 4 non-Steam game-specific launchers on my PC.
148.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
If you intentionally post something publicly, it's public. Full stop. The tricky part is dealing with inadvertent or malicious (i.e. some other party), posting of private information to a public space. That's really hard to deal w
149.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
> I regret that now. I, on the other hand, am thankful for it. I love watching Anton Petrov, PBS Space Time, and various other experts and communicators in anything space-related. This looks like a great podcast that slipped me by, so I
150.
▲
by
ziddoap
2y ago
Probably because a single example at a single time point can't really be extrapolated to the entire platform across all times. The comment being downvoted proves nothing (as evidenced by the fact it's now upvoted to the 2nd top co
More ›