ziddoap

14 ms·

151.
by ziddoap 2y ago
I agree. "It's not what you said, it's how you said it.". Most stuff I downvote is because of the way it's expressed, not because of the opinion itself.
152.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Maybe time will tell if it was actually OT. When that time comes, if it comes, then you'd be within the guidelines to post it. Preemptively posting it just in case it later becomes some new phenomenon is not ideal.
153.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Most of this essay is either about wholinator2's comment (for some reason?), or your thoughts on grading and why you're qualified to have those thoughts. Anyways. > Please don't confuse expertise and experience with condes
154.
by ziddoap 2y ago
I like how you just ignored everything they said, to try and coerce them into saying "yes", presumably so you can extrapolate that out to some other point you're trying to make.
155.
by ziddoap 2y ago
If it isn't in reference to what ceejayoz linked to... what tariffs are you talking about? A link would be great, but you can just name the products if that's easier, and I'll look up the data.
156.
by ziddoap 2y ago
I believe this story is supposed to bring a more human/relatable element to the impacts of the tariffs and trade war, using a unique family-owned business that happens to make a violin widget. Focusing on cheaper Chinese competitors an
157.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Extend this thinking out globally, where some of the products need factories (or entire supply chains) that take a decade (or more) to establish, and you might realize that there are some issues (at least short-term) with the "simply b
158.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Seems like learning was done and fun was had, alongside some marketing content being produced. In turn, I got some learning done and some entertainment. I think those are all benefits.
159.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Meta, but this might be one of the longest comments I have seen in reply to a couple sentences. Lots of condescension, emotions, and holier-than-thou in it, right before asking the person to not react emotionally. Fun stuff.
160.
by ziddoap 2y ago
That's a joke posting, isn't it? I have a hard time believing it is a real position. > Your onboarding will be making collection calls. > At least 50% of the code you write right now should be done by AI You're doing
161.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> What is also less talked about is now AI models are beginning to write without exhibiting these issues. It will be great when I continue to write the way I have for decades, continuing to be accused of being AI, while actual AI writin
162.
by ziddoap 2y ago
It's absurd to think a single word (the comment didn't even say phrase), or even a single phrase, is evidence of AI. > "If it's interesting and/or you already have a relationship, which their publisher _likely_ d
163.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Your inability to tell when things are AI doesn't mean other people can't. I didn't even comment on whether this article is AI or not. My point is that it is absurd to point at a single word as proof of something being
164.
by ziddoap 2y ago
At least this is a better effort at explaining why you would believe it is AI than the other poster who just says it's AI because they used the word "likely". I still find it very annoying that in every thread about a blog po
165.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Using "likely" is indicative of AI now...? Absurd. The only thing as annoying as people using AI and passing it off as their own writing is the people who claim everything written not exactly how they are used to is AI.
166.
by ziddoap 2y ago
If this is some elaborate troll or April Fools to confuse me, you've succeeded. I have no idea what you're going on about.
167.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Maybe I am misunderstanding. I think you are... The only thing I've said in this comment chain is that Kagi cannot guarantee that bad stuff won't show up. Which you seem to agree with (despite saying my argument is void, for
168.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Are you expecting a company to manage it completely without human intervention, yourself without verifying the results? What? Parent commenter asked if it was guaranteed to block the bad stuff. I answered no. That's the entire co
169.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> "That's what Kagi is aiming for but they can only do so much." Not sure why my argument is void, but you restating my exact point with different words is valid?
170.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> So the main question that I have is, is there a guarantee that bad sites will not show up here? Given that everyone has different definitions of "bad" and that someone malicious can put bad stuff on "good" sites, n
171.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Neither. I would not read anything into a random hacker's twitter follow list.
172.
by ziddoap 2y ago
What exactly is the point you are trying to make? He got in trouble for obstruction of justice and misprison of felony for trying to cover up a breach. Not because there was a breach. There are basically no punishments for a breach itse
173.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Given your replies throughout this thread, I get the impression that you don't filter or curate anything and just see a few things on the default youtube feed or whatever and judge everything else based on that. There are so many good
174.
by ziddoap 2y ago
The first thing I associate with "content creator" is youtube. Probably one of the last is "onlyfans model".
175.
by ziddoap 2y ago
If this breach receives a fine in the top 5 fines ever issued in the entire history of GDPR enforcement . Don't forget to subtract out the money they saved from reduced investment in security over that time, as well. Noticeable? Sur
176.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Have they ever issued a fine for 4% of revenue? That's the maximum fine possible, under the non-standard "higher maximum" category. This breach surely won't be given the maximum considering there isn't really anythi
177.
by ziddoap 2y ago
According to the GDPR enforcement tracker link helpfully provided by the sibling commenter, we'll be lucky to see a ~1% fine of the 2024 revenue of Oracle. That's assuming that the fine issued is in the top 5 GDPR fines ever issue
178.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Nice, thanks for the link! The largest fine ever issued is about 2% of Oracle's 2024 revenue. If we average the top 5 fines ever issued (this breach surely wont result in the largest GDPR fine ever), it'd be about 1% of Oracle&#x2
179.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> It is selling de-identified, aggregate data Just a note that re-identifying aggregate data is a whole field of study that is decently successful.
180.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Have their been any GDPR fines that amount to more than a rounding error of Oracle's revenue? Admittedly, I don't watch too closely, but from the ones I am aware of, I haven't seen any GDPR fines that made me finally think &q

More ›