Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zcrar70
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
Twitter: let the information wash over you
(feedproxy.google.com)
1 points
by
zcrar70
17y ago
|
0 comments
62.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
He's actually quite magnanimous about Apple (though the opposite isn't true) - I've read a few nice comments about Apple from Bill Gates. I guess he doesn't feel he needs to prove anything anymore (which doesn't seem to be the case of Steve
63.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
Nice quote
64.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
In a similar vein, but a little less OTT, you could check out Ross Enamait's site: http://www.rosstraining.com/ It's a pretty good all-round fitness 'program' of sorts, or perhaps more of a collection of exercises, and much less prescript
65.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
I sense sarcasm - much more than is usually acceptable in Economist articles (I was checking to see whether it was a blog post!)
66.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
they seem to see it as their mission to make sure no one else uses it I don't think they necessarily do - they're just saying what they think, but then other people read it and get annoyed (justifiably.) That's the thing with blogs, the e
67.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
It is, and it isn't funny, or clever. Flagged for stupidity.
68.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
That's a pretty depressing story, but very powerful, too, and a very effective counterbalance.
69.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
It seems to me that the incentive to innovate is rather low without IP protection...
70.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
Perhaps you missed the several times that I said I did not make that choice I didn't miss you saying that, but I also noticed that you replied to my original post with an unequivocal answer - so you don't support doing it, but you also th
71.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
Interestingly, I've been having a similar discussion with someone here at HN: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=658355 I agree with the author that it isn't acceptable to launch DDoS attacks on Iranian state sites, and then complain abo
72.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
Cool - I wish I had the discipline (and time, but really discipline) to do this.
73.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
Their relationship was sunk, but the company survived - that's the important things taken care of at least!
74.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
Quite right, thanks :-)
75.
▲
We Done Been ... Framed
(codinghorror.com)
50 points
by
zcrar70
17y ago
|
9 comments
76.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
Still, I’m tired of being sold the story of someone’s life, when it’s their work that will impact mine. This sentence did it for me - I definitely agree. There's a tendency to focus on life stories these days, and they're given the same i
77.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
on the surface they said "we won't support", but what they actually meant was "we'll break it next version". How do you know that?
78.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
Hmm, I do kind of see the point he's trying to make though - 'Fail' seems to be like a fratboy in-joke, the kind of thing that's OK to shout out because it's funny, but that is actually a little thoughtless and sometimes cruel. The tabloid
79.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
According to the article, 'Morro' may be the name of a beach in Brazil, but it also means 'Moor' in Spanish. That's certainly what I first thought of when I saw the article - the Moors were certainly ferocious warriors, but I'm not sure tha
80.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
No bombast intended. Chill out. / perhaps the next time you hear it you'll get it. Contradictory? Look I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings You didn't - but you still didn't answer my question. What makes it OK for you to hijack Iranian
81.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
Your question might have been rhetorical, but it was inane. I didn't think it was, but I'm once again surprised by the arrogance and self-righteousness of your statement. I thought that this kind of bombast had no place here, but perhaps
82.
▲
Url Shorteners: Destroying the Web Since 2002
(codinghorror.com)
76 points
by
zcrar70
17y ago
|
57 comments
83.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
Actually, it could equally be called 'Misguided'.
84.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
> Google can afford to pay for them. That's the reason the artists are pissed. That was my point, exactly.
85.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
> But your question deserved an answer. And it didn't look like you were able to come up with one. Actually, my question was rhetorical, and your answer was arrogant. > In a sham government, it's just some assholes who pretend to re
86.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
What makes it right for you to take down an Iranian government website, but wrong for someone in Iran to take down a US government website, or for someone in China to take down the Dalai Lama's website?
87.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
And along the same line, if Google can't afford to pay them, then who can?
88.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
And quite right too - if artists have to keep give their artwork away for free to get exposure (which is what they're usually told is the main benefit of giving their work away for free), who's ever going to pay them?
89.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
Live CDs will still boot slower than full installs, because accessing the CD is a lot slower than accessing the HDD. I'm wondering whether the boot time for Live CDs will be fast enough to avoid displaying the progress bar, or whether they
90.
▲
by
zcrar70
17y ago
"Bonnie and Clyde, that's only because they're young and good-looking," scoffs Detective Terry Sweeney of the Philadelphia police. "These two were complete idiots. If this was two fat fucks from South Philly, it would have been Turner and
More ›