Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zapzupnz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
62 ms
·
631.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
Not to mention youtube-dlg has a nicer, more powerful UI.
632.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
> The social structure in those two examples will be very different. You would not want to do what you suggest. I didn't suggest anybody do anything in my post. I merely postulated on scenarios where technology can (and does exist t
633.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
> you ask if you missed anything during the period For high-volume, fast-paced channels this may not be appropriate. For slower channels where people rarely post anything, you constantly asking "did I miss anything while I disconnec
634.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
I suspect you're right that GP was likely talking about a different context but I think that person failed to make that clear, therefore making it seem like their mantra for variable names was universally applicable. Clearly, it isn&#x
635.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
Not all mechanical keyboards are made equal: there are the switches to consider, the actual build of the keyboard, the design of the keycaps (there are low profile Cherry MX-compatible keycaps, for instance).
636.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
But one's thumb doesn't rotate like that. If one needs to make one's thumb rotate to use a trackpad with a thumb and another finger, that trackpad must be the size of a sheet of paper. I'm probably misunderstanding. I
637.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
I've been sitting here for a good minute trying to make my thumb rotate the way you've described on my Magic Trackpad (no hardware buttons) and it simply isn't doing that. > Using the thumb for buttons and long for trackpa
638.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
It doesn't matter how good the other trackpads are if they don't have the software driving it. Even with Microsoft standardising the trackpad interface for drivers in Windows 10, that doesn't matter when plenty of non-Metro a
639.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
This sounds fine if you're the only one using the code. In business, the practice you're describing is needlessly fragile. My opinion is that you shouldn't have a home style and a work style — you should just have correct s
640.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
You got distracted by the Rose Tinted Glasses Brigade, but I think you're absolutely right. On top of that, I think there were other design considerations — how to make iOS' scale up to iPad more easily (remember when Siri was in
641.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
> Buttons looked like buttons That's an odd one to focus on. Buttons only ever showed in the navigation bar at the top; one rarely, if ever, saw buttons other than to go back and to edit, and since the newer design, the focus has be
642.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
> you're bound to end up with something flat and uninteresting That's the ideal: a computer that gets out of the way. They've been wanting that since long before Steve died, too. Hence the iPad, literally just a screen. Or
643.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
For long spans of Mac OS X's history, Apple always shipped an incredibly old version of OpenGL. With Apple deprecating OpenGL, this isn't really anything new or interesting — that is, until the day Apple removes OpenGL, we will ha
644.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
I didn't say any such thing. I think you might have meant to respond to a different comment.
645.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make. Did you mean to respond to me or someone else?
646.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
> I'm calling out people who get upset at the idea of a computer doing "wasteful" work, when that wasteful work has no meaningful impact on latency, responsiveness, power draw, etc. But who gets to make that call? For ever
647.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
> Sometimes we forget that the OS exists to facilitate the apps, not the other way around For OS where the base operating system didn't offer much functionality to apps beyond the basic API for building controls and so on, this migh
648.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
> To be fair, nobody cares I think people do care, but they don't know what they dislike. I mean, there are certain things we tolerate on the web, like a UI taking a while to load. We don't tolerate that in native apps — even i
649.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
You have a lot of people giving you technical responses as to why immutability was always an illusion on the internet. They make good arguments. But that's just indicative of the HN bubble, being satisfied technically correct reasoning
650.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
Oh, I understand that it's plausible. It just seems idiomatic to the author or translator, that's all. Nothing wrong with that, no judgement here. :-)
651.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
French video game company with a Japanese name producing a major software title for an American company that sells worldwide. That might seem unremarkable by today's standards, with practically everything being global in nature, but I
652.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
Just an interesting aside: whenever I see Japanese articles translated, the reported speech ascribed to older Japanese interviewees often includes such language as "I'm like, 'Hey, how are you doing?'". I wonder if
653.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
Good point, although there was value enough in the comment. That is, one can extrapolate that just because the episode was related to the topic, that doesn't make it intrinsically interesting in and of itself — as might be implied by t
654.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
I don't know why you were downvoted. It's perfectly possible to find a concept interesting but some show's execution upon it uninteresting.
655.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
So just have the adapters plugged into the Pi all the time. I mean, what else would you use them for? Problem solved, no drama.
656.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
So presumably they'd run old-Ubuntu 32-bit chroot in new-Ubuntu.
657.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
The PPC emulator, Rosetta, also required a full compliment of PowerPC libraries and frameworks installed. Though 10.6 did not support booting on PPC and only included Intel drivers, the basic system frameworks were still Universal Binaries
658.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
> This is a straw man argument. That would imply ill intent on my part, and there was nothing of the sort. All I said was that I couldn't see the sense in certain things and, without further explanation, I didn't. Other comment
659.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
This response makes sense to me.
660.
▲
by
zapzupnz
7y ago
I've never quite understood the notion that languages like Python and Ruby are amenable to fast prototyping. Ultimately, you wind up just having to carry complicated type information in your head rather than write it all down in your c
More ›