zapzupnz

3 ms·

1.
by zapzupnz 23d ago
Comment from every dang year. The more recent complaints have been about Github being ruined by Microsoft. And this is why MS gets away with EEE, because people have short memories and say to themselves "nah, it won't happen again
2.
by zapzupnz 25d ago
Embrace. Extend. <-- You are here. Extinguish. We may never actually reach Extinguish. That won't be by Microsoft's choice, though.
3.
by zapzupnz 27d ago
> Everyone connecting these TVs to the internet has access to the internet to tell them not to do that. > I just am baffled how so many still fall for this. Because you're assuming everybody else is you, cares about the same thin
4.
by zapzupnz 28d ago
> So most consumers are willing to knowingly "Knowingly". No, they don't know. You seem to think that because you know, then so must everybody else. I have no words for how depressing that way of thinking is.
5.
by zapzupnz 28d ago
> But surely you know No? It's hardly written in the advertising copy for the TV, is it. This is a technical website with technical users. You are failing to put yourself in the shoes of non-technical, ordinary users who just want t
6.
by zapzupnz 1mo ago
Not just a repo/index but they also offer reasonably-priced compute, with a free tier not to sniff at, on which to run the models.
7.
by zapzupnz 1mo ago
Who is this person? Why should I care about this?
8.
by zapzupnz 1mo ago
> Not to mention the problematic nature of trusting any data coming from a country known for state-sponsored deception, trolling and organized operations in informational warfare. What, like the United States of America? I find it so odd
9.
by zapzupnz 2mo ago
Cue responses from all the people a week ago moaning about it not being open source on day one, despite there being a precedent from Chris Lattner that it would all go down exactly like this.
10.
by zapzupnz 2mo ago
You responded better than I thought you might, credit where credit's due. Have a good one.
11.
by zapzupnz 2mo ago
From your profile: > "You're posting too fast. Please slow down. Thanks." = censorship. Unaccountable [flag] = censorship. > Mass un-elaborated on downvoting = censorship; needing 500 karma to downvote = censorship. &gt
12.
by zapzupnz 2mo ago
2025 and 2026 have proven that to be vastly untrue. It was never true. If it was anything, it was rampant laziness.
13.
by zapzupnz 2mo ago
It's not just N, it's Z.
14.
by zapzupnz 2mo ago
Meanwhile, five minutes for the next one is luxury in my neck of the woods where you're more likely to wait 30 minutes to find out the next one is cancelled.
15.
by zapzupnz 2mo ago
> That's my point. It's a lot more complicated It's not so complicated that you assume you need to run out at this very moment to find the nearest elevator just to prove a point. That's moronic. > There are escalat
16.
by zapzupnz 2mo ago
> I think the nearest one is a mile away, that seems really inconvenient and unnecessary I think this way of thinking, being obtuse on purpose to try to win an internet argument (without a prize, no less), is the more unnecessary thing.
17.
by zapzupnz 3mo ago
And some sports games, which is where it seems clear they just wanted their own Wii Sports. Not so much the game itself so much as the excuse for the masses to buy a console for a game even grandpa can play.
18.
by zapzupnz 3mo ago
It was 100% chasing the Wii. It didn't chase all that hard, either.
19.
by zapzupnz 3mo ago
They look much better.
20.
by zapzupnz 3mo ago
Why are all the screenshots showing a translucent window. If “it is designed specifically for power users who want […] zero interface clutter”, why advertise it by making it look like it needs a going over with Spray & Wipe because the
21.
by zapzupnz 3mo ago
Your comment got downvoted for being flippant but I agree. It's an interesting discussion but it really comes off as grandstanding. Doesn't address the main thrust of the article nor the comment to which it replies.
22.
by zapzupnz 3mo ago
> outright admission of failure Right!? Who's out there going "oh no, translucent is too translucent; opaque is too opaque; but now that I can have 72.93% glass, my life is complete"?
23.
by zapzupnz 3mo ago
Mac OS X 27. 10.27? But that means there were two each of 10.11, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14, and 10.15 :-)
24.
by zapzupnz 3mo ago
Voilà, I think you may have fallen for their trap. That's why they've done nothing about this to date even though volume normalisation is a solved problem.
25.
by zapzupnz 3mo ago
It's on the front page now.
26.
by zapzupnz 3mo ago
On what basis?
27.
by zapzupnz 4mo ago
I have control bugs. Like, if I drag around a window using my trackpad, I can't seem to 'drop' the window; the state doesn't change and I'm stuck with a window attached to my mouse cursor. I agree that I'm not
28.
by zapzupnz 4mo ago
> Or scrolling represents a viewpoint, such as a frame Which is not natural. The manipulation of a trackpad matches the manipulation of a document, natural. There's no real world concept of a 'viewport' that makes sense wi
29.
by zapzupnz 4mo ago
It doesn't have that on Windows. When natural scrolling is enabled on Windows, it works the same as on macOS.
30.
by zapzupnz 4mo ago
Touching a trackpad is just an indirect way to touch the document. You're doing the exact same motion, pressing upwards on the trackpad to push the page upwards.

More ›