Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
yepguy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
151.
▲
by
yepguy
7y ago
It's absolutely possible to continue doing squats + bench + deadlifts in the same workout for a very long time. After about 6 months I moved to deadlifting only once per week, but it was still done on my "heavy day" after set
152.
▲
by
yepguy
7y ago
Riposte doesn't look all that useful outside of a test framework. I want to be able to use REST APIs in a full Racket program, which seems impossible in a DSL without control flow or functions.
153.
▲
by
yepguy
7y ago
Does Racket have a nice DSL for wrapping web APIs? I have a hard time believing it doesn't, but I can't find it. I'm thinking of something like API-Wrap.el ( https://github.com/vermiculus/apiwrap.el ), but
154.
▲
by
yepguy
7y ago
That sounds a lot like the patch theory stuff from darcs and pijul.
155.
▲
by
yepguy
7y ago
My understanding is that shred hasn't been reliable for many years now due to smarter and less predictable firmware in modern storage devices. Basically, you can't trust that your SSD deleted the data it said it did, or that it wr
156.
▲
by
yepguy
7y ago
Scroll to the bottom of the SuperMemo homepage ( https://www.supermemo.com/en ) and look at the list of articles. Some of them are rather informal, others are more academic, although I'm unsure if they were peer reviewed
157.
▲
by
yepguy
7y ago
I'm in the middle of switching from webmail to mu4e. I have a decent mutt setup that I never use, but I switched to Emacs this year and mu4e-conversation ( https://gitlab.com/ambrevar/mu4e-conversation ) looks like
158.
▲
by
yepguy
7y ago
Collecting it and developing their software, I guess.
159.
▲
by
yepguy
7y ago
I think it's relatively new, and their data was only recently made publicly available.
160.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
OK, but you just switched use cases from a "static blog" to interactive web page with untrusted inputs.
161.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
Legal rights are things that society decides you're entitled to. Natural rights are basically theological in origin. Violating them transgresses the natural law regardless of what society decides (or even whether society exists, I gues
162.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
I agree with you that there are at least 2 classes of "wants," but I would say the distinction is way more subtle than you think. For one thing, when it comes to my own motivations it's usually completely unreasonable to take
163.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
What hope does constitutional free speech have for the future if its citizenry doesn't hold the principle dear? The public must actually practice something that approximates the free speech protections they want from the government or
164.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
If you use a custom domain with those services you can still place a file anywhere you want.
165.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
That doesn't really prevent anyone from attacking a hosting service like GitHub Pages or Netlify, though.
166.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
Most scientific methodology tries very hard to exclude subjective experience by design. Well, if you do that then of course there will be a lack of evidence for subjective phenomena! Just in case you're tempted to downplay science'
167.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
They're staying.
168.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
* restic, a good backup tool: https://restic.net/ * rclone, like rsync but for cloud storage APIs: https://rclone.org/
169.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
They're both under active development.
170.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
That new HP laptop commercial featuring the fingerprint reader makes me facepalm every time. They advertise it as "reinventing passwords" WHILE ILLUSTRATING EXACTLY HOW INSECURE IT IS. https://www.youtube.com/watch
171.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
Also keep in mind that when you stack abstractions on top of each other, the whole stack gets more brittle. So if you want me to use your better idea, it shouldn't abstract over the thing you're trying to replace. To give an examp
172.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
> us programmers are worried we will be accused of being users if we use tools that are interactive. [...] Of course programmers do not realize this psychological issue exists and will not admit it is a possibility. It would be nice if y
173.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
Correct me if I'm mischaracterizing you, but it seems like our deepest disagreement comes down to this: You think of misgendering as someone imposing a false identity on you. This is an injustice because you have a right to determine y
174.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
To be clear, if I met a transgender person I wouldn't know what to make of their gender. So if they told me which pronouns to use I would just use them. (Well, provided they weren't made up words...) But what if someone strongly b
175.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
> How am I making them falsify their opinions? If I believe you're female, but call you male because that's what you prefer, in what way is that not speaking contrary to my beliefs (i.e. lying)?
176.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
> Who's the unreasonable party, here? I don't know; that has to be negotiated through dialogue. This problem can't be limited only to pronouns, unless you're okay with people saying things like "she's a man&
177.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
Expecting people to say things they don't believe strikes me as a bad idea.
178.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
Why exactly can't you explain that you're male? Why would you be defined by other people? I don't see how these points follow from mine in the slightest. And how did bodily autonomy enter into the conversation? EDIT: At least
179.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
Well the principle isn't to avoid singular they at all costs. Although there are contexts that call for a gendered pronoun and where it's difficult to interpret they in the singular ("Alice isn't here, they are over th
180.
▲
by
yepguy
8y ago
This just happens to be where pronouns clash with free speech, which I consider a sacred value. You don't get to choose the words that other people speak. It's invasive and destructive to a person's integrity, and potentially
More ›