Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
yebyen
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
127 ms
·
901.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
I'm not the one who downvoted, and I don't know how many blind people make their own braille displays. It seems unlikely to me. (Not impossible. Another quick search reveals that multi-line braille exist, so it has been done.)
902.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
Assuming this is a serious question, I think you will know the answer if you look at how any braille display works. They basically "display" one line of text in braille at a time. So unless you can appreciate your pixel graphics
903.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
Ulcers are one of the possible results of acid reflux, that's a symptom too but also a risk factor. You won't be able to heal ulcers if you don't get the acid reflux under control somehow first. I'm on Pantoprazole for
904.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
Is that really improvement if you need to run a browser to run the app? I guess most of us have the browser open all the time anyway, so adding an Electron app is just one more thing, but I know that Chrome on my machine soaks up a lot mor
905.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
For a hackathon a couple of years back, we wrote a module for Hubot for Slack integration that was conversational. It was absolutely incredible how difficult it was to get Hubot to have a simple scripted conversation and remember any conte
906.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
What would be the fix? I'm asking sincerely as someone who is only surface level familiar with HPKP, and have never implemented it (but my boss did...) If someone ransomed you, would you need to pay them for the key, and then use the
907.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
:D I don't know what that means, but I'm going to upvote you and go find out what interesting reading material I have missed! Edit: As a rails dev, I know that there is no silver bullet, but I also know that some strategies are ob
908.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
Or, we would have long ago found better ways to adopt design and development strategies that more generally lend themselves to rigorous and easily repeatable testing.
909.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
This doesn't work for me. (Edit: and, it's moot now, because it seems to be coming back up!) I also have 2fa enabled (it's a private team) and my repo is private... I do seem to reach the repo, and it tells me I'll need
910.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
It's 500 last time I heard, but you don't get a downvote button on every comment. And there is no downvote button on posts (or if it is, I haven't reached that threshold yet.)
911.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
When you have to painstakingly earn the right to downvote, you just can't feel bad about using it once in a while.
912.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
I understand that every time I've applied for credit, I gave permission for those organizations to share my information with third parties. But why can Equifax just go ahead and store and share my information in perpetuity, with no exp
913.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
It's a flaw in Disk Utility, so no I don't think so
914.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
Apache Guacamole is at least 1000 days old, according to the top comment on this post which was made 500 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11744430
915.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
This is nearly the same announcement that came from Deis at the last community planning meeting at the start of August. In fact, Microsoft only promised 6 months of maintenance after their final v2.18 Deis Workflow release. And you know, b
916.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
But I don't have this right. I can't tell Equifax to get bent and delete my record. I'm not asking for my credit history to go away (and shame on you for being the tenth person to suggest that I am), I am asking for the harm
917.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
I'm claiming that we should have the right to tell one of the three credit reporting agencies to get bent and delete our file if they're Equifax in October of 2017. That's not the same thing as "delete the record of deb
918.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
Oh shit, I swear I did not see that coming https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/71jc83/firefly_up... New crowd-funding page!
919.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
> > We are ALL affected by this breach. > POTENTIALLY affected. This is true. We don't know if they got all of the records. Reports of "143 million Americans impacted" would seem to indicate that it was roughly eve
920.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
It was delayed, in terms of how long it took them to let us know that we could be affected. It was hasty, in terms of... just look at equifaxsecurity2017.com Did they run this plan by even one security researcher before it was put into acti
921.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
> > They should not have been in charge of the response > Then who should have? Better question: what would be an appropriate response? Because this one isn't, that much is sure, but I don't have an answer for this quest
922.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
In Europe, if I understand EU data privacy laws, all three of those CRAs would need my permission to retain my personal information. Maybe not explicitly granted by me directly and personally, but absolutely revokable by me, both directly
923.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
> I still don't understand why they wanted to make a completely separate site with that stupid name. Probably because they still weren't sure that their existing systems were secure. So instead of securing them, or unplugging
924.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
> Remember the Target data breach? Or the Home Depot breach? How about when Sony was distributing a rootkit on their music CDs? Or when Lenovo was distributing a malware package preinstalled on their laptops? Or when Best Buy was selling
925.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
> What about the SEC Butterymales! What about Hillary! My credit history is still in the hands of Equifax and I have no control over that fact. That is problem number one for me. I want to get off of Mr Bones Wild Ride.
926.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
Their behavior during the response has been chock full of negligence, and I don't need to prove it in a court of law. I just need you to concede that point, and I can go on with my day. :-D They should not have been in charge of the
927.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
> How so? What would you expect from law enforcement here? Copied from another sub-thread I posted in... When Sonny Vleisides plead guilty to Felony Mail Fraud in 2007, he was forbidden to engage in loan programs, gambling or gaming acti
928.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
If we can't have reasonable licensing requirements, then we need a "right to be erased" like they have across all of the European states. If 140MM Americans (or even 50MM, let's be reasonable) told Equifax that they want
929.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
Now if we could just do something about those housing prices, that might even be possible. (What percent of homeowners do you suppose bought their homes without taking on some debt?) Paying rent is also bad for you.
930.
▲
by
yebyen
9y ago
Only in America. They could not store personal information about us without obtaining permission in Europe, and we would have the right to revoke it for any reason as well. This is not normal, it is dysfunctional. I'm not arguing tha
More ›