3 ms·
Assuming this is a serious question, I think you will know the answer if you look at how any braille display works. They basically "display" one line of text i
by yebyen 9y ago
Assuming this is a serious question, I think you will know the answer if you look at how any braille display works. They basically "display" one line of text in braille at a time.
So unless you can appreciate your pixel graphics one printed line at a time, it's unlikely that any blind person will be able to get any benefit from this application.
- Sir_Cmpwn 9y agoExisting one-line braille displays don't understand braille unicode anyway. What's to stop a blind person from making a braille display with a greater display area?
- yebyen 9y agoI'm not the one who downvoted, and I don't know how many blind people make their own braille displays. It seems unlikely to me. (Not impossible. Another quick search reveals that multi-line braille exist, so it has been done.) TBH I just did a quick search for braille displays to validate my assumption, and when the first few results came up looking roughly like the one-line display that I expected, I wrote this comment. I'm not an expert in this kind of thing though.
- callahad 9y agoMy understanding is that braille displays are quite mechanically complex, as each cell needs to be able to individually raise and lower six pips. An 80-character, single-line terminal display would require 480 tiny actuators.
- katastic 9y agoExcept they already make bigger than that. A 25x40 display. https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Refreshable_braille_display https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Refreshable_braille_display A full page braille display with 1,000 cells (25 lines of 40 cells) was developed in 2015 by the Tactisplay Corp.[3] With total 12,000 pixels configured in 120*100, it can show any BANA compatible braille graphic page in 8 seconds. This video shows operation of the device. http://www.tactisplay.com/product/tactisplay-table http://www.tactisplay.com/product/tactisplay-table
- Sir_Cmpwn 9y agoWhy did you link to this instead of the actual article? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refreshable_braille_display https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refreshable_braille_display That site is proprietary, adds trackers, etc. -1