y96V89C668e7Q74

4 ms·

1.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
Hey, thank you for this, I'm glad someone said this. It sounds like you know a lot about this. Are there any companies known for flexible hours the way that some companies are famous for remote work? As a night person, I've always
2.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
When something like this is found, is the family just out of luck as far as the value of the item goes, or do they somehow get compensated? Obviously they didn't know it was stolen when they bought it from the rare document dealer. Is
3.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
I feel like you work at my last company. But so many companies f * this up that it could be any company. I got fired from any last job after being one of the only engineers willing to say something to management about this. I figured I had
4.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
It seems like the other comments in here are proving her point. Hacker News, too, proves to be an insensitive place.
5.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
Interesting. Would it be fair to say that startups issuing stock is a positive or at least neutral signal whereas a public company issuing stock is a negative signal?
6.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
Fair point, stocks do have inherent value even if they are just paying dividends. I guess that in that case it's market growth that is zero sum (eg, one company growing must mean that another company is shrinking).
7.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
Good distinction, thank you. I wonder if there are stats somewhere to see what percent of capital is in public markets vs private. Also, now that so many of the unicorns like Uber and Lyft are going public, I wonder how much of the market i
8.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
I recall learning this too. I never heard that prices shouldn't go up. Maybe the above person meant that the total valuation shouldn't go up? If so, that logic does check out.
9.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
> indicates that they can't find growth opportunities at any price. This is a great way to put it! Thank you. Would it be fair to say that this suggests the market isn't really expanding and has essentially become zero-sum (or
10.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
I was taught in economics classes that buybacks make sense when there is nothing the company believes it can spend the money on instead to increase its profit. If this is true, should we be concerned that this is a market signal that the ec
11.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
Genuine question - is this what you're referring to? Very curious. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurit...
12.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
> is not ever going to be ok from a dozen different security perspectives. What dozen perspectives? > Any of the other examples can easily be decompiled or reversed. reply ... I don’t think I said any of those things? Sorry, I interpr
13.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
The client side code is open source. The server hosting aspect costs money. Open source is not the same as free.
14.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
Can you explain why it is faulty?
15.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
No because I'm also making the argument that the browser is not much less secure than the other JS platforms.
16.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
That doesn't make it any less secure, there are plenty of open source cryptography libraries and apps like Signal. Closed source doesn't equate to secure.
17.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
As others have posted, JS is much more than script tags in the browser. There's also React Native, Electron, Node, and many other less well known platforms for JS outside of the browser. Additionally, browser E2E encryption depends on