3 ms·
That doesn't make it any less secure, there are plenty of open source cryptography libraries and apps like Signal. Closed source doesn't equate to secure.
by y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago
That doesn't make it any less secure, there are plenty of open source cryptography libraries and apps like Signal. Closed source doesn't equate to secure.
- chrismeller 7y agoI don’t think I said any of those things? Crypto happening in the browser (or any browser-based “app”) is not ever going to be ok from a dozen different security perspectives. That makes Node the only possible platform where it makes sense, and that’s what I said.
- y96V89C668e7Q74 7y ago> is not ever going to be ok from a dozen different security perspectives. What dozen perspectives? > Any of the other examples can easily be decompiled or reversed. reply ... I don’t think I said any of those things? Sorry, I interpreted "decompiled or reversed" as insecure. I'm curious why there's a problem if the frontend code can be reversed? Or another way to ask this is, how is that any different from an open source app?