Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
xyzzy21
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
36 ms
·
331.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Strictly you can NOT actually get perfect models with 100% prediction for any coil design because magnetic fields can only be solved directly with Maxwell's rather than the simple algebraic equations being used by this app. That'
332.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Evidently their degrees are Bayesian FALSE POSITIVES - they are NOT the experts qualified as their degrees would mislead you to believe!
333.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
It means Google is a totalitarian company full of assholes who are not helping anyone.
334.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Neither radiation nor lead nor DDT have these kinds of effects. The most likely scenario are endocrine disrupters in the form of any number of industrial chemicals introduced over the 20th and 21st centuries. The EPA has no protocols or r
335.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Well, given that the SpaceX rocket engine runs on methane and a lot of it, it makes sense that they'd need a cheap and plentiful source of that methane (aka natural gas). The cheapest way to get it now is by fracking - the infrastruct
336.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Stop using FAANG products and services. That's what will be most effective.
337.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Poof and it's gone... A perfectly normal word...
338.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
This is where a human videographer could trivially do better or add value. The obsession with "automating everything" is a real disease in ML and CS generally. Sometimes it makes things worse! This is one of those situations.
339.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
It depends on where you were raised. Maybe not in Blue Urban cities but it's trivial in the rest of the USA (where FEW Blue Urban denizen has likely ever traveled).
340.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
This is a wonderful ANECDOTAL story. I'm happy for her. However: Statistically it's unlikely to be common future - you can not generalize reality from specific cases from the tails of the distribution! If you categorized her befo
341.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Indeed. You started dying the moment you were born!
342.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Yet another reason to never use Facebook! Using Facebook has been an IQ test - you are below 100 if you use it!
343.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Honestly this doesn't happen if you have a good corporate culture to begin with (which Google has not had for quite a while). I always go back to my experience at HP when Bill and Dave were still alive: the leadership decision to trust
344.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Indeed. The guy not understanding EITHER what an engineering firm actually is nor what a business is.
345.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
As someone who was raised in the Bay Area and had 3 decades of tech career in SV, and left forever in 2016, I'm still surprised at how thick those remaining are to not see the reality. I assume they don't get out much so they
346.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Yes, sometimes. I'd recommend that any man thinking about taking these for ANY REASON (including transitioning) have his T levels measured first - Low T is more likely to cause adverse behaviors and mental issues than high T (contrary
347.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Absolutely! Cialis is my "go to" also - because it's half-life is about 24 hours so you can take it once a day and not "plan" what is often unplannable. Also agree with citrulline. Good choice plus it also helps wi
348.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
In MOST countries of the world, viagra, et al. are "over the counter" and have been for nearly 20 years. Requiring a prescription raises the price of any drug quite radically.
349.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
It can work but the biggest problem is current capacity is generally compromised this way. The best way is to simply design the power supply right in the first place! Today that's using a buck-boost isolating switcher to create BOTH
350.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
It's not "bro culture" or anything "male" - it's just regular lack of leadership at the top.
351.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
EVERYTHING fails and dies (entropy) so it's really a matter of choosing how you "live the life and deal the the inevitability death" (of the battery, not your own). Having a choice with more openness of controls is probably t
352.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
As an MBA with BSEE/MSEE, this is exactly correct. Too many take the degree and training as a blindly followed cookbook rather than just "ideas to think about and think of trying". It SHOULD BE the latter!! The "religi
353.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Original link seems to be gone: https://www.wsj.com/articles/biggest-teachers-union-urges-ti...
354.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
No. Infrastructure is the problem. If you though charge stations for EV were a problem, hydrogen is 1000x worse (and harder to solve). Hydrogen is a bitch to control - generally do you NOT and never are able. We only have to look at the t
355.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
All true. NOBODY has or had any clue about the dynamics of JIT supply chains. If you are an engineer: the assumptions were that they were linear and time-invariant when in fact they are highly nonlinear and time-variant. NOBODY with an MBA
356.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
I don't negotiation or argue anything with mentally ill people. They are a write-off in that regard so I don't get mad. Let them.
357.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
I would have been far harsher! If you work for an immoral organization and are OK with that by virtue of continuing to draw a wage there, YOU ARE AS IMMORAL as the company because you aid and abet it. I won't have anything to do with y
358.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
Fun fact: the USSR used exactly the same technology and that is why enabled the US to monitor all phone calls using the Rhyolite/Aquacade surveillance satellite: microwaves are line-of-sight and due to the curvature of the Earth (take
359.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
It's not really surprising. Engineering (which most programming is) is the economic application of scientific knowledge for human value/advantage. Thus that implies several things: • the core engineering is defined by economics, p
360.
▲
by
xyzzy21
5y ago
This. If you can't get into the heads of those you are communicating with, you will mostly fail in your writing objectives. And this isn't simply what they are thinking now; it's meta-thinking and meta-meta-thinking as well
More ›