wubrr

17 ms·

181.
by wubrr 2y ago
> Processing power What are you doing with your apple watch that requires additional processing power? > screen size and quality Many watches have larger screens, Apple screen quality is among the best - true. > active monitoring q
182.
by wubrr 2y ago
> Because all of those things impact battery life. Oh 'all' of those zero specific things you mentioned impact battery life? Ok. Anyway, I don't even care what the battery life is - my initial comment in this chain is repl
183.
by wubrr 2y ago
So many vacuous claims about supposed missing features, worse displays, worse battery life... and yet the only hard evidence/example in this entire comment chain is the horrible battery life of the apple watch... You're not even t
184.
by wubrr 2y ago
Yes it does, and I can give you many examples. However, the following thing you said tells me that having a rational conversation with you is unlikely: > Garmin isn't like to like since it's not really a smart watch it's a
185.
by wubrr 2y ago
> If a laptop with 2 GB of RAM met my needs and I was happy with it, would you get in an argument with me about how actually my laptop is deficient because other laptops have bigger RAM numbers on their spec sheet, even if my RAM usage n
186.
by wubrr 2y ago
Your personal preference when it comes to not caring about battery life doesn't change the fact that Apple watch battery life is amongst the worst on the market. Just like if you don't care that your laptop has only 2GB RAM - that
187.
by wubrr 2y ago
> It wasn't part of my daily routine, so I would forget to charge it. So maybe the problem is your daily routine, not the fact that the battery life is objectively better? It's like if you bought a laptop with too little RAM, a
188.
by wubrr 2y ago
The specific critique is literally right above. Did you read the comments we're talking about, or are you just triggered by the word 'fanboy'? In case it's too difficult to grasp: >Reasonable person: 'The battery
189.
by wubrr 2y ago
Security is hard, and determining what is worth paying for when it comes to security is arguably even harder - there seem to be a higher than typical amount of snake oil salesmen and grifters in the industry.
190.
by wubrr 2y ago
> because humans generally don't make the types of hallucination errors that LLMs make. They do though - I've noticed myself and others saying things in conversation that sound kind of right, and are based on correct things the
191.
by wubrr 2y ago
> the more that it becomes clear that LLMs really are just "fancy autocomplete", even if it's really really fancy autocomplete I also don't really see AGI emerging from LLMs any time soon, but it could be argued that
192.
by wubrr 2y ago
Yeah for sure. Personally I wouldn't click 'Get started...' on anything unless I already know what I'm getting started with and why.
193.
by wubrr 2y ago
Took a look at the homepage ( https://v2.tauri.app/ )... and basically have no idea what this is or why I would use it. Consider adding something more informative than 'Hardened foundation for your web apps', and ma
194.
by wubrr 2y ago
Out of curiosity - which country?
195.
by wubrr 2y ago
And the power was less centralized after each of these deaths.
196.
by wubrr 2y ago
I think it will be worth it, but we can't just assume that such a medicine will be available for everyone, or ignore the effects it will have on society. Many medicines and treatments we have today are already basically available only
197.
by wubrr 2y ago
I mean, I gave you multiple examples of some of the most powerful people that ever lived, none of which fall into this category you call the 'norm'. You just completely ignored that and continued with your baseless fantasy.
198.
by wubrr 2y ago
> I'd rather have the healthy and energy of a 25 year old and live in a world where there are people far richer than me than be a frail 80 year old where at least I know there aren't any trillionaires. That's a very specif
199.
by wubrr 2y ago
> That's almost a tautology then. No... it's not? Do you know what tautology means? > If you only know one thing about someone, that's also necessarily the best predictor for anything about them. Except it's not th
200.
by wubrr 2y ago
You're assuming everyone gets the immortality and is de facto benevolent. If you actually look at how the super rich and powerful have acted historically - its much more likely that the few richest/most powerful people would just
201.
by wubrr 2y ago
> I highly doubt that. I would guess that income and age would be much better predictors for example. I'm talking about predictors of wealth for a new person. The age and income are both zero. If you have their income - you probably
202.
by wubrr 2y ago
I mean, it's pretty hard to predict what such a society would look like, but it's plausible you'd just be a slave from birth until death (because poor slaves don't get the immortality pill). > I am not convinced thou
203.
by wubrr 2y ago
I would imagine that if humans were immortal, the centralization of wealth and power under a few families would be even more extreme. Which is probably not good for the vast majority of humans.
204.
by wubrr 2y ago
A healthy, well-proportioned human form looks nice to most of us basically at a genetic level. The whole point of good fit is to further accentuate/bring out that form. Saying fit is way less important than shape makes no sense, they g
205.
by wubrr 2y ago
You fell for the 'menswear' meme lol.
206.
by wubrr 2y ago
Dressing well is like 95% about being in shape and buying clothes that fit well. The cheaper the clothes the better, generally.
207.
by wubrr 2y ago
Let's not forget that this is modern Boeing we're talking about... the long timeline could just be incompetence.
208.
by wubrr 2y ago
Sounds like you have no reason to use brave over ublock origin.
209.
by wubrr 2y ago
You have to be maximally naive and gullible to believe this protects you from profiling/tracking.
210.
by wubrr 2y ago
> blocking by default Except it doesn't block all ads by default at all.

More ›