Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
wtfwhateven
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
>I'm not a lawyer but it is not sufficient for Gaza not to be considered "part of Israel". How? >Technically Gaza should either be Egyptian or Israeli. What? No. Why on earth would that be the case? >There is no stat
62.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
Wrong.
63.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
Yep. I recently saw a video of ICE agents crashing into a commuter's car, pulling the crash victim out of the car, slamming her to the ground in a fit of rage and kidnapping her. Still can't find any update about what happened to
64.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
>A deportation order is a final judgment from immigration authorities that a non-citizen must leave the U.S., while a warrant is a legal document that authorizes an action, such as an arrest or search. Ok? They lack those in almost all c
65.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
>Journalists asking for classified and sensitive information are acting in bad faifth. How? >They know that these people are not allowed to give away the information, Not true, nor is everything is classified. It appears you've n
66.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
What possible relevance does what companies do have? I can't believe you're arguing this in good faith.
67.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
https://youtu.be/jG5_IPn77iw Totally very extremely violent ambulance driver parking an ambulance gets threatened with murder by an ICE agent. I guess that's fine as ICE agents are beyond criticism and never ever at fa
68.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
>Here’s an update on one of those: You mean a story provided by an unnamed "senior DHS official"? Not buying it. This unnamed "senior DHS official" also refused to substantiate any of the claims they make. Not sure wh
69.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
>I completely support the right to peaceful protest. No you don't. Or at least defending ICE brutalizing them is a very contradictory way of showing that. > But I draw the line when protesters fail to obey lawful orders The "
70.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
>Could you show me a serious post about anyone actually advocating for injecting bleach and not a misrepresentation of a question asked by the President? Obvious sealioning. >Publishing a persons photos, with their home address and ad
71.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/119 "the term “restricted personal information” means, with respect to an individual, the Social Security number, the home address, home phone number, mobile ph
72.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
Not surprised “I believe the government pressure was wrong and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it,” "I also think we made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn’t make today,” he
73.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
>What does not work? An LG app to control an air conditioner. I use GrapheneOS. Thankfully I've had few things not work. Google Pay being one of them, the other is the garage door (Liftmaster)[1]. I genuinely find it disgusting. Tha
74.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
1) 121 mentions of trump in 600+ comments does not mean more than 90% of the comments are trump. You know this of course, you are just lying. Why else would you mention a count of trump mentions as if your original assertion wasn't a p
75.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
>Surely the journalist had a reason for only reporting on the contents of one of his posts, and not the others, and that choice wasn't intentional in order to present a biased interpretation of reality. Surely. Yes because the sheri
76.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
No, seems he hasn't even used the app before. He is just spamming this thread with thinly veiled pro-censorship advocacy. Seems to be a trend on this site as long as the content being censored is negative about trump.
77.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
>More than 90% of the comments are partisan attacks on Trump. Why would you tell such an easily refutable lie?
78.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
You should actually read the letter instead of assuming what it says.
79.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
How do you suggest this is implemented for mains water supply? Should miles and miles of new water pipe be laid down for every new water supply company on the area and the customer is given a key from Water Corp to turn on their Water Corp
80.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
because the person you replied to said they worked (past tense) at twitter, unlike you who says they [currently] work (present tense) at twitter why would they tell someone not working at twitter anymore to stop working at twitter? and how
81.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
Not even remotely true.
82.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
What extension do you use?
83.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
>There's plenty to pick from. No there's not. Name three. >This is the most accessible and transparent administration in decades, if not longer. The POTUS has held more interviews, with just about every national media organi
84.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
Haha, dunno, someone will have to find out
85.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
I would hope using animals in OF content is illegal and banned anyway I was talking about human lactation. OF was forced to ban it because these same groups perceived it as "obscene" which is truly nonsensical
86.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
Yep. Even showing lactation gets you banned now.
87.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
The community notes are wrong. https://x.com/goodside/status/1944266538191622624
88.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
>They buy from local or state distributors who are national sized companies. Why do you believe they're not affected by tariffs? Do you know what a tariff even is?
89.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
"Your ether daft or lying nether"
90.
▲
by
wtfwhateven
1y ago
"Have you ever criticized the FBI director?" has been in the set of control questions since Watergate? Source? Where's the fear mongering too?
More ›