>I completely support the right to peaceful protest. No you don't. Or at least defending ICE brutalizing them is a very contradictory way of showing that. > B

>I completely support the right to peaceful protest. No you don't. Or at least defending ICE brutalizing them is a very contradictory way of showing that. > But I draw the line when protesters fail to obey lawful orders The "lawful" order of "we have arbitrarily declared this protest is an unlawful gathering, disperse or we will throw you in a cage" > In those cases, I can understand how things escalate and ice agents lawfully use force to arrest the perpetrators. You've been given several cases of ICE agents using force to arrest people who did none of those things. You defended it. >Honestly, I think when protesters get out of line it acts like a recruiting ad for people neither of us want in law enforcement. I think the $50k signup bonus, every administration officials twitter and their recruitment ads did that, not the peaceful protests you believe should be thrown in a cage for arbitrary things such as "they made the agents frustrated" > When the protests begin to frustrate officers, the officers are going to understandably push back. "Frustrated" = angry that a peaceful protest is happening and that people are daring to not be quiet "push back" = violate the constitution and throw the peaceful protestors who did committed no crime in cages