wtfwhateven

6 ms·

1.
by wtfwhateven 17d ago
Your reply is essentially spam. Please stop.
2.
by wtfwhateven 22d ago
>Why do you see the truth as a lie? I don't. Read what I said again. You were lying about what the other person said, i.e. attacking a strawman. >Except there is plenty of evidence across the world for over twenty years of "
3.
by wtfwhateven 22d ago
AFAIK there are no strings attached, the changes were postponed in June: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-clau...
4.
by wtfwhateven 22d ago
Oh, they postponed that in June: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-clau...
5.
by wtfwhateven 23d ago
Why are you lying about what the other person said? They said "no meaningful fraud" as in there's not an amount of fraud that can actually change the results.
6.
by wtfwhateven 26d ago
What strings are attached? I thought they reverted the API usage changes
7.
by wtfwhateven 1mo ago
Please actually read the article instead of being dishonest. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49449449
8.
by wtfwhateven 1mo ago
You, obviously, have neither. A person without a spine is one thing but one without both is just vile, abhorrent cowardice incarnate.
9.
by wtfwhateven 1mo ago
At the time of writing your post 90% of them were talking about the article. That, obviously, necessitates talking about the administration. I guess you interpreted people saying anything other than "I love this admin" as "un
10.
by wtfwhateven 1mo ago
There's numerous civil conversations happening. Why would you tell such an easily disprovable lie? Could you explain how the people talking about their experience having to avoid specific words in their grant request were somehow unciv
11.
by wtfwhateven 1mo ago
>Why is this bad? I don't think anyone voted for the gov to use a crude, ridiculous keyword list with many more false positives than not to terminate the funding of any and all research that simply uttered a bad word regardless of c
12.
by wtfwhateven 1mo ago
None. It's lying, as usual.
13.
by wtfwhateven 1mo ago
No, that is not the definition of "freedom of speech". Please also read the first amendment.
14.
by wtfwhateven 1mo ago
Grow a spine.
15.
by wtfwhateven 2mo ago
Why would you say something so ridiculous?
16.
by wtfwhateven 2mo ago
I hope the moderators here do something about the AI spambot accounts such as the above. One example is here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49076441 There is, of course, simply no good faith rationale for demanding t
17.
by wtfwhateven 2mo ago
Yes it is! the Mondragon Accords. my first thought when seeing the title :) had no idea the name was based on something real! Have been listening to an audio-book of 2312 when I have the time to be fully attentive
18.
by wtfwhateven 2mo ago
What?
19.
by wtfwhateven 3mo ago
Terrible, perhaps even knowingly dishonest, analogy.
20.
by wtfwhateven 6mo ago
The opposite is true, actually.
21.
by wtfwhateven 7mo ago
you cannot be serious. wtf?
22.
by wtfwhateven 7mo ago
Wait the FTC is suing Mozilla?
23.
by wtfwhateven 8mo ago
>Not sure who determines the threshold The SEC. >he certainly goes to court more than your average person Yes because he sues a lot of entities for silly things such as some advertisers declining to buy ads that display next to pro-hi
24.
by wtfwhateven 8mo ago
aaand he never replied It is like they're brainwashed. Awful.
25.
by wtfwhateven 8mo ago
You have clearly not actually read the opinion being discussed and have resorted to outright lying about what it says. Please stop it.
26.
by wtfwhateven 8mo ago
Have you actually read the SC opinion or are you just assuming what it says? It is apparently the latter. >No he can't because this is against the law What exactly do you think immunity makes someone immune from?
27.
by wtfwhateven 8mo ago
Do you think immunity is for lawful things? Why on earth are you arguing that unlawful acts are not covered by immunity? What exactly do you think immunity makes someone immune from?
28.
by wtfwhateven 8mo ago
It is what they ruled. What do you gain from lying about this?
29.
by wtfwhateven 8mo ago
No it hasn't.
30.
by wtfwhateven 9mo ago
which law suspends the constitution for people an ICE agent is in the vicinity of?

More ›