wtfwhateven

7 ms·

31.
by wtfwhateven 9mo ago
"permanently suspending accounts" Surprising, usually the system automatically bans people who post CSAM and elon personally intervenes to unban then. https://mashable.com/article/x-twitter-ces-suspension-righ
32.
by wtfwhateven 9mo ago
lol
33.
by wtfwhateven 9mo ago
Not true.
34.
by wtfwhateven 9mo ago
Yeah I agree. Utterly bizarre replies. Wonder who is paying for it. They should be in prison honestly.
35.
by wtfwhateven 9mo ago
>There are many horrible conflicts throughout the world(i.e. Sudan, Syria, Myanmar) So? Are you saying no resolutions were passed regarding them? >the Israel-Palestinian conflict is quite far from the worst by virtually all metrics By
36.
by wtfwhateven 9mo ago
They're currently gleefully advocating for this situation and demanding anyone who disagrees be thrown in a cage.
37.
by wtfwhateven 9mo ago
>This is clearly a case of extremely blatant bias Not at all, not even remotely. I'm alarmed anyone can sincerely interpret it that way and ignore what prompted those resolutions. It is simply proof that UN resolutions do nothing. I
38.
by wtfwhateven 9mo ago
For the lazy, that unwatch link can be summarized as "israel keeps doing awful things and refuses to stop but the UN is biased against israel because it doesn't condemn hamas in every single resolution that also mentions israel&qu
39.
by wtfwhateven 9mo ago
>What's wrong with account generation? What's right with it? Accounts being generated (i.e. many inauthentic accounts controlled by few people) are always used to send spam, there are no exceptions. The perpetrators should be i
40.
by wtfwhateven 10mo ago
https://ktla.com/news/gop-lawmaker-solicitation-arrest/
41.
by wtfwhateven 10mo ago
Nope. That choice wasn't for aesthetic reasons.
42.
by wtfwhateven 10mo ago
Same. I assume it depends on the destination Person wants to go somewhat far from airport? That's more time on this single ride and less time pocketing peak demand money
43.
by wtfwhateven 10mo ago
Not sure why you're so insistent on avoiding the multiple questions people have asked you that are inconvenient for your narrative. Why does believing something is right or wrong require religion or is in any way religious? Why does so
44.
by wtfwhateven 10mo ago
They seem to be one of those individuals who cannot possibly comprehend the idea that many people simply find murder and rape to be horrible, awful acts that shouldn't be inflicted on others and hold that belief without needing to have
45.
by wtfwhateven 10mo ago
Are you being satirical?
46.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
Brand new account, nonsensical comment... spambot?
47.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
https://www.tn.gov/attorneygeneral/news/2024/1/10/pr23-03.ht... https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/attorneygeneral/documents/...
48.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
Not at all. You are lying to push an agenda.
49.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
No it didn't.
50.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
Saying "some frequency" instead of "often" doesn't mean their overall point is wrong. You know that, you're just being intentionally deceitful.
51.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
>Surely you can't deny that Wikipedia is biased against the so-called "right" side of the political spectrum, and biased towards the "left"? You don't even name the article you were apparently having problem
52.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
He didn't deliver. He should just link to the actual revisions that were reverted. The fact he refuses to is telling. He was definitely not banned as a result of his story, he definitely did something egregious (such as repeatedly insu
53.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
>This is quite literally the opposite of what is happening. No it isn't. Parroting unproven narratives and lies manufactured by the state department only discredits your claim.
54.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
They never do even when asked. Happy to be proven wrong this time of course.
55.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
>Obviously there is something more to this than the headline and tone of the piece indicate. So... what is that something? Did you find out or is the article not actually using the wrong "tone" and is in fact just reporting wha
56.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
>I am very consistent. What's inconsistent about my argument? You really are not. I've already explained. Namely the statehood criteria. Palestine fulfills all the requirements but it is apparent your actual criteria has a &quo
57.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
>a defined territory, a permanent population, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. All of these are fulfilled. >I'm well aware of that. You would not have asked if you were "well aware&qu
58.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
>Palestine has not existed prior to Israel. Wrong. >I have actually read the articles you mention in the past, multiple times, since I make it a habit to be informed about this topic. No you haven't and no you don't. Asking
59.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
>What are the recognized borders of the state of Palestine? >If it's a state why isn't it a member of the UN? Because the US keeps vetoing their membership despite overwhelming support? Refer to the linked articles. The fact
60.
by wtfwhateven 11mo ago
>The court has no jurisdiction. It does have jurisdiction. >So no, they were not solid. They were and are solid. >but that is through some incredibly weird legal gymnastics No it isn't. >by which somehow the non-existent st

More ›