worldsayshi

6 ms·

31.
by worldsayshi 5mo ago
Why can't we (or AI) invent ways to explain information that makes it much more digestible? And the solutions simpler? Why is it necessary to continue to increase complexity when we get better intelligence? Can't we find more simp
32.
Julia Symbolics(juliasymbolics.org)
7 points by worldsayshi 5mo ago|0 comments
33.
by worldsayshi 5mo ago
The more expensive it gets, the higher the incentive for more competition in the hardware space.
34.
by worldsayshi 5mo ago
It should be feasible to crowd fund training runs right?
35.
by worldsayshi 5mo ago
I often think of go as a "better" python. As in, easy to learn and easy to use. But also performant and the module system and package manager seem to be a little neater. (sorry for flamebait) But I wonder how well it can cover sim
36.
by worldsayshi 6mo ago
I absolutely love this vision. He's still working towards the goal. It seems that his vision has problems scaling up though. He seems to mostly still drive this himself.
37.
by worldsayshi 6mo ago
What kind of health devices require reliable internet connection to prevent death?
38.
by worldsayshi 6mo ago
So pi.dev + forgejo?
39.
by worldsayshi 6mo ago
Maybe forgejo has a shot?
40.
by worldsayshi 6mo ago
Wow that has a very different meaning from what I thought.
41.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
I wish we could collectively move over to some decentralized alternative. Even if we make sure to disable the bad parts, relying on these few actors that have such revenue optimized and enshitification-prone business models does not sit rig
42.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
I find YT to be very sloppy nowadays. Not so much AI content as content that is over-optimized for clicks and revenue. 80% filler and maybe 20% substance. I should probably de-algoify my YT experience.
43.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
Does anyone have a grasp of how this relates to interaction nets?
44.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
The more I see the stock market dropping due to idiotic mistakes that should've been very preventable, the more I think how beneficial it must be to be one of the insiders that accidentally let those idiotic things slip through. Are we
45.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
I'm curious what positive externalities you're thinking about? Being able to make plans for the future?
46.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
It also creates a lot incentives for creating unpredictable chaos as an insider.
47.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
I can't believe people are throwing so much money on zero/negative sum games that on average have no benefit to anyone including yourself. I mean I know gambling is a thing but at least we are counting that as an addiction. But we
48.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
This doesn't seem to hard to solve except for the ever so recurring llm output validation problem. If the true positive is rare you don't know if the earthquake alert system works until there's an earthquake.
49.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
Yeah I've seen some parents use this to great success. Seems to also allow them more freedom to allow kids to explore a bit more on their own. Like it's the 90's.
50.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
> swerving is more likely to make you lose control Even if you're not a panicky human but a optimally regulated control system?
51.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
I also live in EU. In Sweden. Most places don't even have parking meters anymore. You're just expected to use your phone. And cashless is the default.
52.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
If clean-room re-implementations are allowed to bypass copyright/licenses (software) copyright is dead in general?
53.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
Those kids are in college now.
54.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
> creating tight permission scopes is tedious work I have a feeling this kind of boundary configuration is the bread and butter of the current AI software landscape. Once we figure out how to make this tedious work easier a lot of new us
55.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
Why isn't users of openclaw "just" giving it its own identity? Give it its own mailbox, calendar and other accounts. Like an assistant. Sure it takes away part of the point but only the part that is completely unhinged.
56.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
I kind of want webrings but with federated OIDC. I.e. you can create an account at any of the sites and re-use the login on the others to leave comments/add content. This has to exist in some neat package right?
57.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
I agree but I also think that authenticity is one quality that such a tool could offer that other things in the attention economy cannot. Addictive things are addictive. But people are also capable, given the right circumstances, to go and
58.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
I expect the internet to be overrun with noise due to bots. So I have a feeling that eIDs are inevitable as a solution in the long run. If that is the case shouldn't we push for zero knowledge solutions?
59.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
I wonder what the biggest (non-AI) moats are for US tech against the alternatives?
60.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
People always makes mistakes. Like forgetting to include a change. The point of PRs for me is to try to weed out costly mistakes. Automated tests should hopefully catch most of them though.

More ›