worldsayshi

5 ms·

1.
by worldsayshi 1mo ago
I find this idea that we need to go through hell to reach salvation to be such a common trope. An unhelpful one. It affects how we see relationships and mental health too. Maybe we should seek out the good things directly and not act as if
2.
by worldsayshi 1mo ago
I think there are scenarios, however (un)likely that will lead us to this point. Imaging them and spreading such ideas can make that more likely.
3.
by worldsayshi 1mo ago
I think the point of stories like these is to accept that the world is too complex to fit into a story but we can try to fit a part of it anyway and we might learn something from it or at least get an interesting experience.
4.
by worldsayshi 1mo ago
Also, set up formulas for calculating speed, torque, forces etc, of each system. Then create a modular simulation library and point and click simulator where all the component variants are covered so that the user can piece new systems toge
5.
by worldsayshi 2mo ago
Yeah I agree and I think code forges as well as AI harnesses are kinda the killer apps of this (relatively short) era. I think once we figure out how to tighten the loop of user feedback, expert analysis, automatic/static verification
6.
by worldsayshi 2mo ago
Why not?
7.
by worldsayshi 2mo ago
I've tried both incus and firecracker. Both seem to work well after initial script setup. I've got the impression that firecracker should be a fairly safe option for such use cases.
8.
by worldsayshi 2mo ago
I remember there's at least one serious effort for forge federation. But don't know what it's called or how to search for it. Edit: here's one: https://forgefed.org/
9.
by worldsayshi 3mo ago
I think these SFRs are basically indoor blimps.
10.
by worldsayshi 3mo ago
And yet all this power in the hands of the very few are only there because the rest of us don't know any better than coordinating for their benefit rather than coordinating in any other way.
11.
by worldsayshi 3mo ago
> places like India I had the impression that India is quickly turning rich enough to say no to things like this.
12.
by worldsayshi 3mo ago
I've used Interrail every time I want to travel a longer distance across Europe by train. Spares me some of the stress of dealing with interruptions since I can often just hop on the next train. Unless it's fully booked...
13.
by worldsayshi 3mo ago
> Or they scan at the edge on the user's device. So then the user can "just" install their own client.
14.
by worldsayshi 3mo ago
> Is scanning mandatory? - No — voluntary. Voluntary for whom? The service provider? Can I opt out of getting scanned? > Does it touch encrypted messages? - No. End-to-end encrypted communications were never scanned but providers coul
15.
by worldsayshi 3mo ago
Why Oracle?
16.
by worldsayshi 4mo ago
Also, all connections in iroh are end-to-end encrypted.
17.
by worldsayshi 4mo ago
Couldn't this be a flaw in the attention mechanism? Like they need some kind of grounding. An awareness of what they fundamentally should care about and how the thing they are currently giving attention to relates to that?
18.
by worldsayshi 4mo ago
It seems like the site is currently getting hugged so I can't look but I'm glad someone is trying to achieve a more minimalistic take on the UX of a software forge. It seems like an area with good room for improvement.
19.
by worldsayshi 4mo ago
Such competition will only turn into a moat of the hardware suppliers never manage (or choose) to fully adapt to increased demand? But then the real moat should be on the hardware side anyway?
20.
by worldsayshi 4mo ago
Realistically they can't go that much above the actual cost for inference since the customer can always switch to self hosted or inference only providers. Or their models have to be significantly better than the open source models for
21.
by worldsayshi 4mo ago
Don't you think that we will eventually get more specialized hardware that will greatly improve efficiency? Running neural networks on GPU:s seem like quite wasteful?
22.
by worldsayshi 4mo ago
I see at least two potential positives in this: - The frontier AI companies have realized they won't be able to count on gaining ground and earning more in the future through sheer moat. They have to start earning right now. - The play
23.
by worldsayshi 4mo ago
> craftspeople take their jigs with them from job to job Except for software gigs the software typically belongs to the customer so you'd need to rewrite it every time...
24.
by worldsayshi 4mo ago
I guess it becomes different if instead of hiring more people to do more - all investment goes into more AI credits. Then again, as long as there is more demand and there's a limited supply of compute you can still continue to hire peo
25.
by worldsayshi 4mo ago
I guess AGI is the breaking point and superintelligence is everything above?
26.
by worldsayshi 4mo ago
> no one can stop me or control what is said no matter what Can't they just triangulate the nodes and hack or unplug them? And put whoever objects into prison?
27.
by worldsayshi 5mo ago
You're probably on point there.
28.
by worldsayshi 5mo ago
> The code it generated was awful. I suppose you could solve that in two ways. Manually rewrite it as you did. Or formalize an architecture and let the AI rewrite it with that in mind. I suspect that either works.
29.
by worldsayshi 5mo ago
I see two points: 1. AIs aren't yet good at architecture. 2. AIs aren't yet good at imagining technically exciting stuff to build. And I agree that there's still space there to build a career in the short to medium term (plus
30.
by worldsayshi 5mo ago
And more intelligence should give an opportunity to increase explain-ability rather than just complexity. It can potentially explain the proof at the level of the listener. Make visualizations. Etc.

More ›