worldsayshi

6 ms·

61.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
I mean that we are in dire need of such tools! I also am not aware of any existing tools.
62.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
Thank you. Haven't seen this problem framed in quite this way before. I find the point quite persuasive. But, I don't understand how this step could possibly work: > start policing on what opinions those people are allowed to h
63.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
What are the most obvious use cases for Nano/Open-Claw. I can't imagine anything obvious that I'd want to use it for. Is it supposed to run your digital life for you?
64.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
In Aftonbladet comments from CGI they seem to think that no production related data has been leaked: https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/ArvG0E/cgi-sverige-uppg...
65.
by worldsayshi 7mo ago
I wonder if the focus on source code makes Swedish news slower to jump on this. I haven't seen it in domestic news yet. (Haven't looked too wide though)
66.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
I very much suspect that this depends on how you use it. You can use it to dig yourself a hole as much as building a ladder to get out. To me it always comes down to whether you focus on cultivating internal impulses that are helpful vs unh
67.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
> Don’t try to save the world. "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Sh
68.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
Does it have personality?
69.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
Yes this is what I'm thinking about! The challenge here though is to prove to the user, especially without forcing the user to go into technical details, that it is indeed private and isn't giving away details. The user needs to b
70.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
I think that not doing partial-identity checks invite bot noise into conversations. We could have id checks that only check exactly what needs to be checked. Are you human? Are you an adult? And then nothing else is known.
71.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
There are better and there are really really bad ways to do ID checks. In a world that is increasingly overwhelmed by bots I don't see how we can avoid proof-of-humanity and proof-of-adulthood checks in a lot of contexts. So we should
72.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
BankID is very convenient but the lock in is ridiculous. Owned by a private company and pretty much every service that you use depends on it. You're forced to own a new Google-approved Android or iPhone to use it and to function in soc
73.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
My only objection here is that technology wont save us unless we also have a voice in how it is used. I don't think personal adaptation is enough for that. We need to adapt our ways to engage with power.
74.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
If that's an accurate description it's very puzzling that European countries buy services from them.
75.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
I think I see your point. I've had it in the back of my head too. Guess it's like the separation between backend and front-end. When the logic is neatly wrapped in a nice API you can potentially get a lot of reusability from that
76.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
Either that or a protocol that is as reusable as email that can facilitate a variety of identity proof and trust mechanisms.
77.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
I like it! I really like that the lines stick to the boxes but it's a bit hard to make them stick.
78.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
Exactly. And I do think that a world where zkp ids are taken for granted is one where the issues they point to will be more surmountable than today.
79.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
Interesting. While that is true I don't see how it's an argument against. Over-asking + ZKP certainly seems superior to over-asking + without ZKP. Without ZKP in a world where you constantly need to identify yourself you have abso
80.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
> PoP makes it possible to prove "I am unique" without giving up privacy. Ah, very nice! I have been trying to figure out if this was possible!
81.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
Yeah, I mean that is definitely an additional hard nut to crack. I also think it has potential (partial) solutions. I'm thinking that there are many ways to prove identity information. You could use something like tlsnotary to prove th
82.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
I mean I can prove with a zero-knowledge-proof that have solved a Sudoku puzzle without actually giving away the solution so this seems possible?
83.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
What about Zero-Knowledge Identity? Use zero knowledge proofs to prove that I have an eID without actually providing my identity.
84.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
I believe we can solve both anonymity + proof-of-humanity using zero-knowledge proofs that act as intermediary between a trusted identity provider and the service provider. I.e. you get a digital id but you use it to generate proofs rather
85.
by worldsayshi 8mo ago
Ultimately it all comes back to the collective action problem doesn't it? I believe that is solvable.
86.
by worldsayshi 9mo ago
> There is also the need for real estate in areas with good sun exposure that also have sufficient fresh water supply for cleaning. Solar panels are 20x more efficient than growing corn for ethanol. Swap out some of those 30 million acre
87.
by worldsayshi 9mo ago
I've used pre-commit very sparingly but it has happened and I also have no idea why this project need to exist? Why would pre-commit ever lead to performance problems? I get that the processes that are hooked in can be long running but
88.
by worldsayshi 9mo ago
It sounds like at least some of the problems pointed at would be mitigated by using fzf. At least it has greatly improved my terminal ux.
89.
by worldsayshi 9mo ago
Sure, that's true. I oversimplified.
90.
by worldsayshi 9mo ago
Well Shadcn gives you more freedom to fix stuff like this and rewrite how you want the component to work and look, since everything lives in your own code base. In a regular component lib it would be less likely that you'd think about

More ›