woeirua

43 ms·

61.
by woeirua 6mo ago
I don't get this for several reasons: 1. There are already apps/websites as an alternative for CSAs. Most of the time I have to call someone its because I couldn't do what I wanted through those portals, so adding an AI agent
62.
by woeirua 6mo ago
I don’t get why we shouldn’t outsource our thinking to the AI. As it becomes more capable, eventually it will be more competent than the average engineer. At that point companies should be _requiring_ the AI to make the larger decisions. By
63.
by woeirua 6mo ago
You would hope so, but yet… a lot of people are getting their teams to reap cost savings.
64.
by woeirua 6mo ago
It’s not how companies work today, but it could be how companies operate in the future. Imagine a situation where single engineers manage a fleet of agents and own entire systems. This is already happening. If that engineer leaves then it’s
65.
by woeirua 6mo ago
I love how the author took zero responsibility for anything that happened. Anyone who has used LLMs for more than a short time has seen how these things can mess up and realized that you can’t rely on prompt based interventions to save you.
66.
by woeirua 6mo ago
Hmm. Looks like DeepSeek is just about 2 months behind the leaders now.
67.
by woeirua 6mo ago
Nice to see them openly compare to Opus-4.7… but they don’t compare it against Mythos which says everything you need to know. The LinkedIn/X influencers who hyped this as a Mythos-class model should be ashamed of themselves, but they’l
68.
by woeirua 6mo ago
I think you’re glossing over a lot of use cases. For example, I want my email’s spam controls much tighter.
69.
by woeirua 6mo ago
This feels like another Twitter moment... unless he's absolutely desperate for engineers who can train LLMs. In that case it's basically an acquihire. Otherwise, this makes absolutely zero sense.
70.
by woeirua 6mo ago
I agree with this mindset. Instead of submitting code diffs, we should be submitting issues or even better tests that prove that bugs exist or define how the functionality should work.
71.
by woeirua 6mo ago
Explain the emergent capabilities of AI then.
72.
by woeirua 6mo ago
I think Figma is cooked. Not because they can’t eventually compete but because they’re just too slow. A company of 2500 can get outmaneuvered now by a team of 5 agentic engineers. To compete Figma would have to tear down all their internal
73.
by woeirua 6mo ago
Now you’re starting to get why Anthropic/OpenAI aren’t worried about their margins. They can just clone a bunch of valuable existing software along the way and capture big pieces of those markets too. All they have to do is hold back a
74.
by woeirua 6mo ago
> I don't think AI is intelligent; nor do I think that the current (admittedly impressive) statistical techniques will lead to intelligence. It’s increasingly difficult to rationalize away the capabilities of AI as not requiring “in
75.
by woeirua 6mo ago
Is this just a wrapper on top of Beads?
76.
by woeirua 6mo ago
The value prop is tenuous and most people still think agents aren't capable of doing this type of work reliably yet (which is... kind of true). You won't get punished too much by users for false positives when summarizing tasks, b
77.
by woeirua 6mo ago
This makes a lot of sense, but I can't see anyone paying for this because at its simplest layer it's just a Neo4j install + some skills + a local cron job for Claude Desktop. How long will it take for Anthropic to just bake this i
78.
by woeirua 6mo ago
Holy misleading headlines Batman. They're not spending $3.4B on solely tokens for Anthropic are they? I don't think so... If anything the CTO is just saying, we're blowing through token budgets way faster than expected as the
79.
by woeirua 6mo ago
Just reading the comments here it's amazing how many people seemingly don't know that Claude Desktop and Cowork basically already does all of this. Codex isn't pioneering these features, it's mostly just catching up.
80.
by woeirua 6mo ago
Claude Desktop / CoWork already does this.
81.
by woeirua 6mo ago
I think a disclosure and a way to limit the total cost would be appropriate. If agents are capable of making contributions back to GasTown independently then I think it makes sense that users of GasTown should have to contribute some tokens
82.
by woeirua 6mo ago
I don't get the use case for these... Their primary customers are enterprises. Are most enterprises happy with running daily tasks on a third party cloud outside of their ecosystem? I think not. So who are they building these for?
83.
by woeirua 6mo ago
Of all the potential uses for AI, catching people violating traffic laws in safety critical situations is one of the least offensive to me. Ticketing people who run school bus stops is a no brainer. Same for people recklessly driving throug
84.
by woeirua 6mo ago
I'm not opposed to hiring the cream of the crop using H1Bs, but that would only be a few thousand people a year. The vast majority of H1Bs though are people taking jobs that Americans can definitely do.
85.
by woeirua 6mo ago
It’s way easier with a mono repo.
86.
by woeirua 6mo ago
No human has ever let through a major security vulnerability… right? Right?
87.
by woeirua 6mo ago
UBI ain’t gonna be enough for most white collar types to maintain their current lifestyles.
88.
by woeirua 6mo ago
That is absolutely not true. There are plenty of Americans who can do these jobs.
89.
by woeirua 6mo ago
There is absolutely zero reason to believe you could use this same approach to find and exploit vulns without Mythos finding them first. We already know that older LLMs can’t do what Mythos has done. Anthropic and others have been trying f
90.
by woeirua 6mo ago
Yeah. Extremely disappointing.

More ›