wilg

6 ms·

91.
by wilg 3mo ago
This is word salad. People are making things that you want so they can make a living and you can have something you want. This is a win-win. The only problem is you have to pay for things which people only offer in exchange for money. You c
92.
by wilg 3mo ago
If the best you got is "you can't stop me", that's true, but not really very relevant to what is good and right.
93.
by wilg 3mo ago
I don't think the idea of "paying creators for things I want" is outdated or impractical. Law and order is the foundation of civilization, and just because some dumb companies charge more than you want does not mean you are r
94.
by wilg 3mo ago
That’s an excuse, not universally applicable, and not even well supported by your own link. > Herzog continued. “I don’t like it because I would like to earn some money with my films. But if someone like you steals my films through the i
95.
by wilg 3mo ago
No, those aren't the restrictions. But there are restrictions. First-sale doctrine allows lending. But you are not allowed to play the movie in, say, a restaurant, theater, or other public place.
96.
by wilg 3mo ago
The point OP is making is that it's not the concept of ownership that has been twisted, there just never was ownership of media beyond owning the actual copyright. Everything else is licensing.
97.
by wilg 3mo ago
You actually have to support the creators however THEY want if you want access, not however YOU want. I suspect you're not actually supporting all the creators of the things you watch via piracy!
98.
by wilg 3mo ago
Yes, of course it's easier to pirate it. The problem is that its unethical (and illegal). That you find it inconvenient to pay for things you want is not a valid justification.
99.
by wilg 4mo ago
Yes, this joke/point has been made 10,000 times in this thread in almost every comment, and on every other previous thread. Thank you!
100.
by wilg 4mo ago
Because Anthropic has terms of service with more stipulations than just "you must pay and can use the service for any purpose"?
101.
by wilg 4mo ago
https://github.com/open-source/sponsors
102.
by wilg 4mo ago
> significantly better performance-per-watt than current state-of-the-art alternatives An interesting example of how the current market dynamics incentivize low cost and therefore power efficiency and therefore lowering resource use.
103.
by wilg 4mo ago
This is more of a question of the definition of "drive a car" than any specific issue about intelligence. Drive a car without errors? Impossible, and now we're into a subjective discussion about what feels intelligent. Pass t
104.
by wilg 4mo ago
None of that changes whether it's a UI toolkit, which it surely is.
105.
by wilg 4mo ago
https://www.statista.com/chart/30934/world-best-universities...
106.
by wilg 4mo ago
They don't have to sell?
107.
by wilg 4mo ago
America has world-class wines, cheeses, and olive oils.
108.
by wilg 4mo ago
I've tried very hard to use Git (with LFS) in both Unity and Unreal and its just been a total disaster of problems for me and the team. Hopefully this can help.
109.
by wilg 4mo ago
Working on making my first video game (unannounced, https://gamedepartment.com ). We're also spinning out some of our internal playtesting tools into a playtesting service that I think is going to be really cool.
110.
by wilg 4mo ago
I think "brain" is a shorthand here so your point isn't really illuminating much.
111.
by wilg 4mo ago
More or less stuck AI in all the obvious spots, which will probably be fine I guess. Not super exciting!
112.
by wilg 4mo ago
Good luck finding pure and true land that never changed hands from war or conquest.
113.
by wilg 4mo ago
Where else?
114.
by wilg 4mo ago
Is there evidence this is actually true? When I’ve looked I’ve found the historical reliability is overstated and also ignores cost, availability, and environmental impact of manufacturing and using newer appliances and devices. Lots of old
115.
by wilg 4mo ago
It should be legal to make and sell proprietary software with whatever server entanglements you want as long as they are clearly disclosed. If customers and care about open source and free software games, they will support them. There is no
116.
by wilg 4mo ago
WIW: nothing
117.
by wilg 4mo ago
You're suspicious that the person doing academic research on how AI applies to law has a job related to research on law and AI?
118.
by wilg 4mo ago
Who's gonna determine that? A bunch of law professors?
119.
by wilg 4mo ago
What criteria would you use for judging legal arguments?
120.
by wilg 4mo ago
> In a blind evaluation of nearly 3,000 anonymized comparisons, professors rated AI responses significantly higher than answers written by other professors, with AI winning 75% of head-to-head matchups. 75% win rate seems pretty good! Pa

More ›