wilg

6 ms·

121.
by wilg 4mo ago
Because I think it's good for software developers and consumers for people to have the flexibility to sell something that depends on online services which may become unavailable at some point in the future. This is more valuable than r
122.
by wilg 4mo ago
This would be a much preferable law to the one actually proposed.
123.
by wilg 4mo ago
I think it should be legal to sell something with a pointless online verification component.
124.
by wilg 4mo ago
I remain happy with GitHub!
125.
by wilg 4mo ago
This is fair for some reasonable time window after purchase. But I think it's okay for things to have a lifespan even if they cost money.
126.
by wilg 4mo ago
Yes you should!
127.
by wilg 5mo ago
Well, they're not selling you the game. They're licensing you the ability to play their game. And yes, I think it should be legal for a hardware product (like Spotify's "Car Thing" https://en.wikipedia.or
128.
by wilg 5mo ago
Why would you be entitled to infinite support? For a game with an online component? Why does the game's purchase price extend to infinity instead of "for as long as the developer supports the game"?
129.
by wilg 5mo ago
Except shutting down a game is not fraud.
130.
by wilg 5mo ago
This is such a terrible solution to a literal non-problem. You should be able to make software that has a limited lifespan if you want. I just think that's fine. Games should not be special.
131.
by wilg 5mo ago
No it will make everything a live service game
132.
by wilg 5mo ago
"Auto" in Claude and "Auto-review" in Codex are the only way to do agentic coding.
133.
by wilg 5mo ago
Can you please fix the issue where like 99.99999% of the time Claude tries to launch a subagent on its own accord it gets "Prompt is too long" and tries several more times, then gives up and does it without the subagent. Big waste
134.
by wilg 5mo ago
Still seeing it in new threads with Claude 1.9659.1 (193bcb) 2026-05-28T16:22:15.000Z
135.
by wilg 5mo ago
I tried creating a workflow in Claude 1.9255.2 (1dc8f7) 2026-05-27T01:57:20.000Z and got API Error: 400 messages.3.content.11: `thinking` or `redacted_thinking` blocks in the latest assistant message cannot be modified. These blocks must re
136.
by wilg 5mo ago
You're misunderstanding your own argument.
137.
by wilg 5mo ago
The obvious rebuttal to that framing would be that if those workers are not able to create that value on their own (such as by starting their own business or bringing their expertise to a firm with more favorable terms) then they aren'
138.
by wilg 5mo ago
Can’t be because business chat both sucks ass and uses grey bubbles.
139.
by wilg 5mo ago
I'm as happy we have a non-crazy pope as the next liberal, but as someone who isn't religious I think it's very important to be skeptical of any opinion given by a religious leader. As such, they've declared they are rej
140.
by wilg 5mo ago
That's not X. That's Y.
141.
by wilg 5mo ago
The problem is what I was originally replying to - people making false claims about reality. This makes improving the world substantially harder because misinformation affects what choices people make in their daily lives and in elections.
142.
by wilg 5mo ago
Similarly, I've heard people talk like that about things that are not drugs.
143.
by wilg 5mo ago
They don't need to justify it!
144.
by wilg 5mo ago
You're not going to believe this, but happiness is well studied too: https://ourworldindata.org/happiness-and-life-satisfaction
145.
by wilg 5mo ago
This information is just... available to you. Yes, homeownership being one of them - improving. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RHORUSQ156N Yes, "sex in exchange for money or drugs" - improving. https:&#x
146.
by wilg 5mo ago
Look, don’t know what to tell you, there is lots of extremely reliable well vetted and well understood information about the welfare of people on this planet and in what directions it is moving. Pretending information is imaginary or offens
147.
by wilg 5mo ago
Basically all the data we have about people’s actual reality (including and especially what they say they are experiencing first hand) does not match the dire descriptions of the people I’m replying to.
148.
by wilg 5mo ago
What are you relying on if not information about reality?
149.
by wilg 5mo ago
Whether most people agree is irrelevant to whether it's right. You can look at all kinds of numbers which are not the stock market to determine how well people are doing and whether things are getting better or worse. Your conspiracy t
150.
by wilg 5mo ago
"What people have" is robustly measured, well-understood, and pretty much all available evidence suggests that people (at least in the US and developed countries) are doing better than ever on most important metrics. But it is not

More ›