Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
wilg
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
841.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
This doesn’t use a “shower cap” though.
842.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
I suppose the first step would be looking into what the regulations are for this sort of thing, and whether you think they are sufficient.
843.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
Fairly boring argument. My guess is it's true.
844.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
So then why would you trust the company? Wouldn't he direct them to do the same?
845.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
I am talking about a different metric.
846.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
Rather than hoping it gets shut down because of your fears, why not just take the approach of ensuring the FDA closely regulates the safety and efficacy of the technology. They do clinical trials and study these things to address concerns l
847.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
Here is the brochure for the clinical trial that this is likely from: https://neuralink.com/pdfs/PRIME-Study-Brochure.pdf
848.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
Why would a spokesperson from the company saying it to a news network be any more reliable than the CEO of the company saying it publicly?
849.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
It's worth thinking about just how much could be accomplished with a device like this even with the theoretical minimum bandwidth. Just one input and output signal, like morse code. If your brain could reliably send and receive text th
850.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
My guess is just a computer cursor. But I suppose it's possible to enable other stuff once they can iterate on it with an actual person. Update: Yes, sounds like it. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1752119
851.
▲
The first human received an implant from Neuralink yesterday
(twitter.com)
153 points
by
wilg
3y ago
|
157 comments
852.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
I am disagreeing with you about whether that is an important metric.
853.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
I am aware of that, but the metric I have been talking about this the entire time is neither of those.
854.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
What if it's a situation where all the music streaming services pay 70% and Spotify has the most streams and therefore the highest total dollar amount, but the lowest per-stream payment. It would be highly arguable whether Spotify is b
855.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
Well sure, but they could be wrong.
856.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
I mean if it's a race they've lost.
857.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
Technically the battery gets a teeny bit lighter because of E=mc².
858.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
True, but percentage terms would also be interesting. If they all pay around 60-70% of their revenue to rights-holders, which seems like the case, the question of which of these services pays best or is most ethical or whatever becomes more
859.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
Spotify gives 70% to rightsholders, yes?
860.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
Could have to do with how Apple announced its compliance plans yesterday and that's what everybody is talking about.
861.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
This isn't an issue worth fixing because basically nobody else is worried about signing up for an Apple ID if they want to update their business information with Apple. If that's the blocker, you'll just have to rely on Apple
862.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
yes there's a login involved
863.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
I doubt that. More likely people are just motivated to interpret it negatively because it supports their point if they do.
864.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
It doesn't mean nothing. It just doesn't mean being punished. You can look it up if you are interested.
865.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
"Accountable" doesn't mean you have to be punished.
866.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
Who was that? Can't find anything about it.
867.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
People should really look more at hacking capitalism to do big exciting things, like SpaceX, IMO.
868.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
Would be interesting to see a LEGO set that demonstrates a system the author thinks is better!
869.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
The text of his tweet also "gives away the magic trick": > Optimus cannot yet do this autonomously, but certainly will be able to do this fully autonomously and in an arbitrary environment (won’t require a fixed table with box
870.
▲
by
wilg
3y ago
Tom Scott recently did a video about how linguistic relativity (Sapir-Whorf) is almost certainly not true: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmZdGo6b5yA It's an alluring idea, but it's been debunked.
More ›