whoknowsidont

5 ms·

91.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
Detail what changed? Because I can't point to anything. And I've been doing this for 4+ decades. A lot of that remote. So you're claiming things radically changed, and if such changes caused a huge shift in the workforce it s
92.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
>Is it really hard to understand that the infrastructure for remote work, which I think everyone would agree got a major upgrade during the pandemic, would also make it much easier for companies to outsource software dev work? No, becaus
93.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
>But rather that workplaces and workforces geared towards remote working has made it more feasible and accelerated the process By what metrics?
94.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
Not sure where the gap would be, it's pretty straight forward.
95.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
I think you're contradicting yourself or getting some wires crossed. >You're right, talented workers get talented pay, but talented pay in Romania is a lot less than talented pay in San Francisco. But this is due to again, vast
96.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
Nothing. Don't think I said that, I certainly don't think it.
97.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
>Which is why they will happily pay for talented labor in other positions on earth. Which to be clear: is not happening. They're buying very low cost labor and are hoping to power through it for some sweet juicy numbers.
98.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
You were being off shored before remote work was ever a thing lol.
99.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
No one likes to hear it because it's not a part of it lol. Paying fair market wages is different than trying to exploit differences in vastly different standards of living between very very different economies. Talented workers get tal
100.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
"Are the people doing the humane and civil things the same as the people actively supporting and promoting evil and hate? I guess so!" If you're not being disingenuous you're being incredibly infantile. Take a big, long
101.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
>It is incredible, because a lot of people dismiss it so eagerly. Because it's wishful thinking, and it only serves one purpose and only benefits one group. You can't say it wasn't tried. Far from it. It didn't work o
102.
Truth Decay: Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis (2018)(rand.org)
5 points by whoknowsidont 1y ago|1 comments
103.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
Probably this one: https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/03/politics/texas-immigration-la...
104.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
>If you just want to see the people who voted for this as "the enemy" and "evil" you're basically doing the same tribal "othering" that's lead to these outcomes you don't like. "If you po
105.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
>For example, why doesn't Chicago have any driver-less trains and a conductor shortage? The unions are preventing both. Most of your post was complete non-sense but this last line really does take the cake.
106.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
You're using this forum to gain traction on your "applications" that are just white labels of open source software in non-novel ways. Meaning you're effectively abusing this site to generate revenue.
107.
YouTube announces 'voluntary exit program' for US staff(techcrunch.com)
67 points by whoknowsidont 1y ago|27 comments
108.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
What an astoundingly similar comment to: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45734456 I'm sorry but there is no way for reasonable people to believe that Grokipedia would be a legitimate alternative to wikipedia. It b
109.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
If this isn't ragebait I don't know what is.
110.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
I think the definition of hallucination fits pretty neatly.
111.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
>runs 4x as fast in .net10 vs .net8. Is this open source? Do you have numbers? I've been coding in .NET since it was "a thing" and frankly I'm having trouble mapping the optimizations to a local application at that ma
112.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
You just repeated what I said.
113.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
>We already have long-established legal precedent for dealing with such issues and much more. We really don't in reality. The manner in which even the existing laws are enforced leaves a lot to be desired.
114.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
>It's counter-productive to punish someone for something out of their control. For people in specific classes that benefit from networks and status: it is not. It should be default. If you abuse your power and position, it should ha
115.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
>It doesn't matter how fast you spin your wheels working on things unless those things are aligned with delivering value to actual paying customers. Really doesn't matter. I promise you. It might score you some points, sure. Bu
116.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
What is the point of this... platform? Also you can't scroll down to the footer because some wonderfully experienced designer (or PM or even engineer) decided the infinite scroll list was a good idea. Classic.
117.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
Try being honest, you only have one life on this Earth.
118.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
Claiming something is objectively wrong while stating something that can be refuted with 10 seconds of Googling means you're massaging your own ego at the expense of everyone else's time. Grow up.
119.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
It's simply not a possibility. Facts are facts. Events have occurred. It's not a perspective.
120.
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
Some of you are really going out of your way to make this more complicated than it is. Next you're going to complain about the fact that the compiler handles static variables with controlled allocations for you in C. Like there's

More ›