whiplash451

4 ms·

1.
by whiplash451 16d ago
I think you’re confusing fan in and fan out.
2.
by whiplash451 17d ago
As an engineer, I can relate but also found a workaround in deciding what kind of interactions I wanted to have with an LLM. As a coding agent? Yes. As an advisor for life decisions? No. And then there's a lot of in-between where I d
3.
by whiplash451 26d ago
OpenAI and Anthropic are so close on benchmarks and release date that they are essentially ex-aequo at this point. The market is just hedging their bets. There is no close second, because the AA Index points are expentially harder to get as
4.
by whiplash451 29d ago
There’s quite a few companies in that field already. Keen to hear their feedback if they are reading this.
5.
by whiplash451 1mo ago
Is there evidence that small models hallucinate less than big ones?
6.
by whiplash451 2mo ago
Groundbreaking includes the “explain to the world why it matters” part
7.
by whiplash451 2mo ago
Well I surely hope so. That’s the whole point of fine tuning.
8.
by whiplash451 3mo ago
Why inefficient? If Claude continuously makes the system more efficient based on demand, there's no reason for the system to be less efficient than if it was managed by humans.
9.
by whiplash451 3mo ago
I am with you and wish you were right, but good luck forcing Meta to change the key dark design patterns of their products (correctly identified by the regulators as "highly personalised recommendations, autoplay and infinite scroll&qu
10.
by whiplash451 3mo ago
You pay your taxes to Lightspeed?
11.
by whiplash451 3mo ago
https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/73150/Teller_... ICRA, 2010
12.
by whiplash451 3mo ago
dang does not scale. It’s on us to make this place how we want it to be. Every comment matters
13.
by whiplash451 3mo ago
> negative feedback - and dismissive feedback - is something you need to be prepared OK. Let's RFM: first line = "Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes." So, no, it&#x
14.
by whiplash451 3mo ago
We might be over complicating things here. The governments’ focus might be on protecting genuine users (adults or not), not fighting fraudsters. In other words if ZKP works for the vast majority of technically illiterate people with their E
15.
by whiplash451 3mo ago
That sounds like a lot of complexity for the average user.
16.
by whiplash451 3mo ago
Aren’t there fees to convert fiat from/to crypto on both ends?
17.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
You can buy the companies making up the index instead of the index itself. It was proven to be a good strategy on the SP500 [1, 2] With 500 companies, it's work. But you can probably approximate it with a top 100. [1] https:/&#x2
18.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
At this point it might be about talent. He could raise and build his own company. But the ability to attract the level of talent that Google/Anthropic/OpenAI have is a different story.
19.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
Maybe because they know where things are going with Gemini (more ads to your face) while Anthropic might, for once, have a different story. When personal finance is not the bottleneck anymore, the new criteria becomes "vision" and
20.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
"weak" in what sense?
21.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
> Not something I would pay for to use outside of work You wouldn't but apparently your employer would. I don't disagree with you on robotics, though. For an empire like softbank, not buying an "insurance against the rise
22.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
How does Lerobot prevent « full control » and « understanding »? I thought this was an open source library. I am not an official supporter of the library but am asking out of curiosity.
23.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
This could be of interest to you: https://thealliance.ai/projects/tapestry
24.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
Why are we even allowing this in Europe? These smart glasses are just plain data collection and surveillance in plain sight. When does the nightmare stop?
25.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
Not if the model is part of a broader product that happens to be very useful/relevant to private companies willing to pay a lot for it (e.g. a coding agent that can do many things but won't help you build a frontier LLM model). My
26.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
> The moat looks deep today but it's going to become more shallow every year. Unless the frontier labs start nerfing their models, which is exactly what seems to be happening. The counter-point to your argument is a future where les
27.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
> it takes O(10) people to build one of these things To build a working prototype, sure. To operate at production scale, definitely not. The same rule would apply to WhatsApp and many other world-scale products. Turns out that, the momen
28.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
The TRM architecture models both the problem and the solution at the same time. You might find it an interesting read. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04871
29.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
You might be missing that those rare humans were sitting on tons of failed or somewhat useful discoveries made by more “mediocre” humans that history forgot.
30.
by whiplash451 4mo ago
To a large extent, the onus is on the teacher to generate interest. Most teaching until uni is mostly forced upon students.

More ›