weioruowiuer

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by weioruowiuer 7y ago

   I would ask everyone to pause a minute before posting and ask if the comment adds substance to the discussion. If you have support for your argument, include it. If you use numbers, please back them up.
2. 2.▲
   by weioruowiuer 7y ago

   good point
3. 3.▲
   by weioruowiuer 7y ago

   I can only imagine the new improved constitution. "If and only if you yell these 900 words and these 30000 phrases at an african american it's racism. But in these 90000 contexts these 1000 phrases are acceptable..." Life i
4. 4.▲
   by weioruowiuer 7y ago

   I think if you took every case heard by the Supreme Court and treated it the same way, they would likely make very few decisions. By these standards nothing is literal enough in the constitution to warrant a decision on pretty much anythin
5. 5.▲
   by weioruowiuer 7y ago

   I think any reasonable / rational human being could use the single word "equality" as the criteria and decide unequivocally that what is being done with gerrymandering is not that. Looks like SCOTUS needs congress to hold the
6. 6.▲
   by weioruowiuer 7y ago

   I'm 99% sure things are going to get a lot worse before they get better.