wawjgreen

14 ms·

1.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
problems with MBT: 1- it contradicts the multiple-selves theory (which is based on science and backed by personal experience and observation.). You have your "good" self, your "private" self, your "evil" self,
2.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
ahahaha. I think it was a case of reverse psychology and a pinch of culty mind control (you have a problem-- we have solution).
3.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
great developers are busy making $$$$$ they are not trying to persuade others they are great developers by writing blogs.
4.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
i don't know in which universe you lived---
5.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
Thank you. Well, since today we hear about Garbageoff, so I discussed my opinion from THIS side of things. For sure, many other "players" are also to blame for a lot of the mess my people have found themselves in.
6.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
If that were truly the case, the red army should not have entered Afghanistan in the first place and kept their little claws to themselves. Now that they entered and created chaos and conditions for civil war, it was on them to clean up the
7.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
it's you again, the "committee" man. actually, since Garbageoff did not do well in school and he was admitted to the universities in Leningrad on the strength of a medal he had won that was given to him based on the large amo
8.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
what do you exactly mean?
9.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
answer me: would you be comfortable if a MAN who says he thinks he is a woman went to the same toilet as your teenage daughters!? cowards downvote, if you are right, come debate me.
10.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
it is easy for you to speak for me, not having experienced war and famine directly. Also, on that Russian score you are wrong: after what he did, the ex-USSR population suffered devastating poverty. And you have the cheek to defend him. Are
11.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
good riddance. he was an uneducated idiot, who is indirectly responsible for the millions that were killed in Afghanistan, in 1992. In 1989, when he pulled the red army out of Afghanistan--he also cut all aid to the Democratic Republic of
12.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
rooibus is not just a tea alternative--it is a tea in itself--and very healthy and beneficial one at that.
13.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
why are you all so hell-bent on glorifying Popper (pooper). He was just a moron with an agenda. Btw, tolerance, like democracy is just a bulls$##t concept. Would you like to be tolerant of the neo-trans man going to the same toilet as your
14.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
are we? Your history of computing begins with Turing????? Turing--with generous help from the British military--merely followed up and finished (in effect stole and took credit for) what Babbage started and conceived but could not finish du
15.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
wow, they have downvoted your comment--but you did not belittle anyone, nor is your comment irrelevant. Hey, HN, must we all write what you like or can we have our own original thoughts? why you so afraid of debates? if he is wrong, prove h
16.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
I don't think it does. Being an atheist, you display your fine intellect for all other readers to see. 2b is a logical outcome for me, and if you think sth is wrong with it, you are implying that an atheist reads scientific works that
17.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
it is the WE that does not care for the works of an atheist because of the fundamental intelligence flaw. If YOU do, then by all means, sate your thirst for second-rate knowledge. I'd rather stand with the likes of Descartes and Leibn
18.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
anyone in that original list of mine has deficient intelligence levels. you need an elementary analysis to see that it is so--there is nothing subjective about logic.
19.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
If you atheists were indeed smart you would not have felt so hurt and downvote my original comment. Also, IQ tests are rubbish (and you didn't know that--which shows your intelligence level). Among us, we look down on any work that is
20.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
For me, reading is decided by two factors: 1: is the author intelligent enough? (I filter out atheists, extremists, nonsense-blatherers, rudes and hypocrites etc). 2a: if humanities, does it touch a chord in my heart? the first 100 pages ca
21.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
feelings are there for a reason. ignoring them means going against your own nature. going against nature has serious ramifications down the line. journos are not qualified to peddle out psychiatric advice.
22.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
yes, CTRL+F on that page for "PDF" then you can click on it to download.
23.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
what's with all these y's in their names! hoyte, dybvig
24.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
Thank you for the great comment. I will go get the book now.
25.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
Yes by "mall" I mean Univermag--the Macmillan defines a mall as "a large building with a lot of shops, restaurants, and sometimes a cinema" which satisfies almost all commercial structures in the USSR. Thus in my definit
26.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
not sure what kind of Russian you were but I lived there a a foreigner around the same time and I don't buy this "hard time" buying food thing...If anything 90's was the decade where food became scarce, after the USSR co
27.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
that is not true. I lived in in USSR for five years--in the late 70's--and your statement does not conform to the reality I experienced for five years. Everyone was kinda middle-class, and nobody was overly rich. The malls were full to
28.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
the article says in the nineties living standards improved in post-USSR Russia, but that is false.
29.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
thank you--i love a good thinking process--i have heard of duke's book and i will definitely read it. i always suspicious linear algebra was very useful in representing probabilistic outcomes and your answer confirms my hunch. ;) good
30.
by wawjgreen 4y ago
are you a dog ;)

More ›