I get what you are saying. 1. Time should decrease to indicate the importance of it. 2. One should sync with attention span rather than something arbitrary li

I get what you are saying. 1. Time should decrease to indicate the importance of it. 2. One should sync with attention span rather than something arbitrary like hour. The idea is that, the number should not be so large (like min) that it becomes a spam. It should not be so low either that you lose track of time. Sync-ing is expensive. I like this clock: (D, W, M, Y) measures 3hr chunck left in the (Day, Week, Month, Year). > In my ideal world things like dentist visits would be completely asynchronous. For stuff like this there is no need to keep track of time at all. Just set a reminder.