3 ms·
How about any personal information illegally obtained (the act already a crime most likely) be defined illegal unless already available legally. However there
by wav-part 10y ago
How about any personal information illegally obtained (the act already a crime most likely) be defined illegal unless already available legally.
However there is still a question of, If a content be blocked globally if its illegal in some country. No IMHO.
- grzm 10y agoany personal information illegally obtained You're right, that should be removed. As you say, it's already a crime, so that wouldn't need any additional support by the RTBF.
- suby 10y agoI think I disagree. By that logic we would also be deleting information like that gained from the Snowden leaks
- grzm 10y agoDamnit. Why can't this be simple? Is this type of thing really personal information, though? Would it be something covered by RTBF?
- wav-part 10y ago> Is this type of thing really personal information, though? Its not. So the rule still works.
- DiabloD3 10y agoIt actually is simple. Covering up an illegal act using state-granted powers is illegal. Someone "breaking the law" to tell people you committed illegal acts is not illegal in any meaningful sense.