watwut

11 ms·

271.
by watwut 2mo ago
I dont know what you mean there. There is literally no symmetry between the two. Not in the case of how Biden administration reacted to cases they lost. And also not in the supreme court treatment - it ideological and political goals are pr
272.
by watwut 2mo ago
Why articles of people who make living by being pro-AI never get comments like this?
273.
by watwut 2mo ago
But there are no maintainer requests. There are is a bot prompted to be obtuse and a while and then reject. What will be happening is that bot will happily talk with your but, but falsely flagged people will be antagonized and eventually an
274.
by watwut 2mo ago
> anyone can use natural language to search for anything. This is extreme democracy and AI is delivering it. No, in that future, knowledge will be defined by a very small group of people making models. And others will be in tiers based
275.
by watwut 2mo ago
Are you an alien who crashed on earth with zero experience of living with humans and no knowledge of human history?
276.
by watwut 2mo ago
> But how is less intelligent being supposed to fully understand a more intelligent one, honestly speaking? It is really simple. It is on the supposedly more intelligent person to be able to phrase things in simple way. Writing something
277.
by watwut 2mo ago
Libertarians are frequently authoritarians. Maybe even overwhelmingly so. What they dont like are restrictions on their controlling impulses.
278.
by watwut 2mo ago
Non creepy people were rejected by billionaires class, they just dont fit in. And conversely, non creepy people also avoid the tech bro creepy singularity is here crowd.
279.
by watwut 2mo ago
Or, we can go back to reality and observe that people are not obsolete and all human work was not eradicates Then we can take down monopolies, tax large corporations, regulate them, empower anti white colar crime agencies again and regulate
280.
by watwut 2mo ago
I strongly prefer home office. And also living in city. I get benefits of both that way.
281.
by watwut 2mo ago
No, it is pro free speech. It is only when you censor or insult or criticize far right that free speech gets in danger.
282.
by watwut 2mo ago
It is not OK to knowingly create harmful products, spend millions on A/B testint so that they are as addictive as possible ... and then blame others for not counteracting it.
283.
by watwut 2mo ago
> Any attempt to propose or even discuss a solution is met with an endless wave of cynicism, sarcasm, and epic burn clapbacks... and usually nothing further. Not true. Obviously bad faith actors and those who literally spend large bulks
284.
by watwut 2mo ago
Looking where USA is and where some EU countries may he going soon (not sure yet, but the risk is there) ... that is why.
285.
by watwut 2mo ago
Wasteful in terms of money and debt? Looking at current ai debt, no. Nuckear arms race was something that could cause harm. This is intended to cause harm by design. And it is already clear it will cause harm to many people regardless of wh
286.
by watwut 2mo ago
I said "forced on us everywhere" and you are arguing by "there were producta with deadly substance". You took the goalpost, moved it to another country and now argue that ball did not moved with it.
287.
by watwut 2mo ago
Yes cruelty is the point for this admin and its voters. They think it makes them more manly looking. They openly brag about it. They glee in it. They go out of their way to endanger goals just to be cruel. All of that is in the open, if you
288.
by watwut 2mo ago
None of that is comparable to us having ai buttom on whatsapp, camera, email, jira, vacuum cleaner, everywhere. To workers being threatened with firing if they dont burn enough tokens.
289.
by watwut 2mo ago
Nuclear arms race and tokenmaxxing were two differrent things. Not even nearly the same.
290.
by watwut 2mo ago
Bad faith argument. There are places with water shortages and other places with leaking pipes. The datacanters consuming water in place with drought is issue. Leaking pipe next to a lake is not.
291.
by watwut 2mo ago
No? Nuclear never had those massive valuations. Did not hyped itself this ridiculous way. Was not forced down on everyone. And the vision of nuclear power was not "make humans obsolete". We did not had nuclearmaxxing. We did not h
292.
by watwut 2mo ago
> Based on polling, the most salient issues seem to reflect economic anxieties. Even stances on immigration are really about that. Meh, the economic anxiety voters are systematically voting for economically worst performing parties. They
293.
by watwut 2mo ago
More people work. Keynes died in 1946 - meaning they had grand depression in his lifetime. Moreover, women employment went up by significant amounts - middle and upper class women would not work back then.
294.
by watwut 2mo ago
I think they are unrelated, but yes, the tech billionaire class is openly hoping for future where large numbers of people are obsolete and without hope or future.
295.
by watwut 2mo ago
Those are ideological and motivated more by wish to punish women who "did something immoral" then by wish to have growing kids.
296.
by watwut 2mo ago
> Religious fundamentalists tend to be less corrupt than whatever your baseline for politicians and rulers Citation and some kind of proof needed here. It is very dubious proposition. > because within their in-groups they're scor
297.
by watwut 2mo ago
Health costs don't matter, because someone else is paying them. We handwave them with "well only 3-4 additional people die after paying that cost. The air pollution does not matter, because global warming already exists and air is
298.
by watwut 2mo ago
AI data centers are much larger, much more visible, much more power hungry, consume more water and noisier. Its just not the same thing.
299.
by watwut 2mo ago
None of these "AC rooms, eating our safe food, having light and hot water" requires super powered corporations or countries. Safe food requires a functional country able to enforce food regulations. That is it, super powered count
300.
by watwut 2mo ago
The power of super-powered countries and corporations went up and down during those 300 years. The claim is not that the world is worst off, but that the super-powered countries and corporations are making it worst off. Then you have backsl

More ›