> But how is less intelligent being supposed to fully understand a more intelligent one, honestly speaking? It is really simple. It is on the supposedly more i

> But how is less intelligent being supposed to fully understand a more intelligent one, honestly speaking? It is really simple. It is on the supposedly more intelligent person to be able to phrase things in simple way. Writing something incomprehensible and convoluted is easier then writing something simple to understand. Even for people. > a new Claude session picks them up perfectly, down to the smallest details. I genuinely doubt so. > What if what we consider excessive circular gibberish is actually highly precise set of instructions needed to minimize error cases for that unreliable human? It is not highly precise set of instructions and it is not following them in highly precise way.