watwut

13 ms·

301.
by watwut 2mo ago
Then I wont stop respomding to it. Yes a lie repeated enough times becomes truth and what you wrote is attempt to repeat a lie. Both about old twitter and Musk changes.
302.
by watwut 2mo ago
> lot of discussion on Twitter in the last few days [...] People from basically all political sides are interested in owning the data center backlash, and are all saying it’s being caused by what they’ve always been on about. I dont thin
303.
by watwut 2mo ago
> Twitter did used to have some pretty notable censorship. Can we stop this bullshit? It has away more censorship now. And its censorship before Musk was already biased toward conservatives, punishing left more severely. Must made it mas
304.
by watwut 2mo ago
It was reaction to > We'll need a few more of "him" to dig us out of this situation I reckon, but overall I still hope it's possible. There is no hope if people like Musk are unnacountable and increasingly powerful. T
305.
by watwut 2mo ago
Based on historical books, funny drawings on toiletes (like boxes they used as toilets and then fertilizer) were super popular. We dont show them in museums tho.
306.
by watwut 2mo ago
And Musks money and twitter takeover did a lot of work to convince Americans vote for Trump. Then Musk joined the administration and continued digging the hole
307.
by watwut 2mo ago
They will try to dig us out of the hole they created by their previoua digging.
308.
by watwut 2mo ago
It is when they live from what they sold rather then being paid salary unrelated to selling. And if you cringe on that, you cant be in sales (which is totally fine). As for term, I dont have dirty mind and did not meant THAT.
309.
by watwut 2mo ago
What your beef is? His articles are so long, you keep scrooling and scrolling. I completely believe they are that long. He is selling his newsletter. I dont know what is vulnerable about your question, but he is being sales there and that i
310.
by watwut 2mo ago
Self made experts with no PhD or formal degrees are testifying in front of juries. They dont even need any science to back them.
311.
by watwut 2mo ago
EU did a lot and e was willing to harm own economies. Betreyal was from elsewhere.
312.
by watwut 2mo ago
How is that pathological? It sounds like a completely normal behavior.
313.
by watwut 2mo ago
> move away from purely academic style of education to practical startup-forcused is needed for the new era. The new era does not seem to be startup or small business focused, that period already was - at around the time google and compa
314.
by watwut 2mo ago
He argues for lowering experience of everyone except founders, so that founders dont have more free time and dont have to learn what university teaches. It is favoring 1 group, not wide areas of the human experience.
315.
by watwut 2mo ago
They are not the same. Per VC culture, small business owner is a looser, tunning lifestyle business. They produce useful products in competitive markets and nurture relationship with customers. Startup is meant to become monopoly and does n
316.
by watwut 2mo ago
Looking at where startup culture went and where tech billionaires stear the politics, I dont want them changing the world. They are literally bragging about building dystopia.
317.
by watwut 2mo ago
> So we should let all those people suffer to promote a small group of founders by reducing course load? Yes, that is pretty much VC enterprenour philosophy in nutshell. It is value system that value only one small group only. And if tha
318.
by watwut 2mo ago
They are proof monopoly power was captured. And practically, they are not good for democracy or even economy as such.
319.
by watwut 2mo ago
Meh, the actual complaint is that it does not really do what it should and keeps burning those $$$ as you ask it to fix this or that.
320.
by watwut 2mo ago
They lobbied for more residencies for years. Complain to your republican representatives for rejecting it each time.
321.
by watwut 2mo ago
> Does nobody remember how most "engineers" were literally copying and pasting snippets from StackOverflow they didn't understand, and the snippets usually had tons of bugs Not in companies I worked for, no. > How many
322.
by watwut 2mo ago
Is fetishizing disruption good for USA? It did helped to create a billionaire oligarch class, but that class is literally intentionally destroying it. I mean, it may end up destroying Europe and the rest of the world too, but the US democra
323.
by watwut 2mo ago
The article is asking for MORE regulation and MORE integration. As in, dear EU, please do not allow member states to make own rules about this, but make one from the central headquarters.
324.
by watwut 2mo ago
Project 2025 ain't gonna implement itself.
325.
by watwut 2mo ago
So, the complain is that there is no harmonization and you want more centralized harmonization, basically?
326.
by watwut 2mo ago
> If the human can read/understand it well enough to comment it, then it is readable by humans. No, because the one who is writing the comment has context later reader dont. The writer knows what the requirements are, what he was tr
327.
by watwut 2mo ago
Misleading and hard to read comments are worst then none at all for readability. If he did what you suggest, he would end up with tons of bad javadoc.
328.
by watwut 2mo ago
You did not read much about history, did you? Or law. If you embed AI into a gun ... you just created a bomb. It is still you who killed whoever it kills.
329.
by watwut 2mo ago
I think that is 100% valid to judge apps in relation to their marketting. They are selling X, it does not do X. It might do Y, but Y does not excuse so high valuations and investments, so they claim X. It is ok to judge them by !X.
330.
by watwut 2mo ago
I dont see why user should care. OK, they are selling at loss so that they can build a monopoly. That is not something positive or good, not something to cheer on.

More ›