vrighter

31 ms·

751.
by vrighter 1y ago
I have, but I never tried to make any money off of it either
752.
by vrighter 1y ago
So? Am I allowed to also ignore certain laws if I can prove others have also ignored them?
753.
by vrighter 1y ago
you could add anything in a png, and encoders should, unless otherwise instructed, preserve any chunks whose format it doesn't understand
754.
by vrighter 1y ago
So you do a bunch of the network's job for it? Also I also remember when I discovered steganography and tried putting it in everything. I was 13. Seriously, what's the point of that?
755.
by vrighter 1y ago
it is contextualized in around that time. That was the time I was actually learning to program. Didn't make sense then either. Doubling the line count (functions should contain a single statement) while also fragmenting it all around
756.
by vrighter 1y ago
the only way I would trust you to verify anything an llm outputs, is for me to know that you can do it withoum an llm. If not, I have no reason to trust that your "verification" is actually verifying anything
757.
by vrighter 1y ago
which means he is still in full violation of their license
758.
by vrighter 1y ago
except for ours, apparently (malta)
759.
by vrighter 1y ago
every time i heard a talk or read something of his I always come out with the impression that he has no idea about anything. Most of what he says sounds like bullshit to me.
760.
by vrighter 1y ago
it is extremely inefficient the larger the distance. It's already not greit when a phone is sitting literally millimeters from a wireless charger
761.
by vrighter 1y ago
Because the LLMs are useless unless you already know the answer to what you're looking for. At least if you're trying to be a serious, competent programmer. And if you're using an LLM to do your job for you in an interview, t
762.
by vrighter 1y ago
Stuff like ISO27001 still demands it. We have to rotate passwords, against modern cybersecurity practice, in order to comply with an information security standard.
763.
by vrighter 1y ago
They already do this, as a fallback to when gps fails. It's not accurate enough for long distances.
764.
by vrighter 1y ago
Because if the llm could tell right from wrong, it wouldn't have to do this in the first place. It's like the bible clainming it's true because the bible says it's true. Circular logic.
765.
by vrighter 1y ago
"correct" for an llm means "fits the statistical distributions in the training data" "correct" for you is "truth that corresponds to the real world" They are two very different things. The llm's
766.
by vrighter 1y ago
If that could be done, then we would be using that and skipping the llms entirely
767.
by vrighter 1y ago
"and suport the claims" is doing some *extremely* heavy lifting there. I can't write a software program, give the source to the greengrocer and expect him to be able to say anything about its quality. Just like I can't r
768.
by vrighter 1y ago
I once did actually have to inline everything. Was making an EEPROM programmer using an arduino and two shift registers, and I wanted to make it go as fast as possible. I was sending data to it in packets over high speed serial, with an ack
769.
by vrighter 1y ago
"straight and level flight implies that lift equal to weight == flying too
770.
by vrighter 1y ago
Asking people for permission to kill them would kill the hitman business. That is not a bad thing.
771.
by vrighter 1y ago
Sorry, but you haven't built it yet. Built it means it is mostly working. This is mostly not even implemented, much less working.
772.
by vrighter 1y ago
There actually is a clean line between flying and not flying. And that's when the lift generated is greater than the pull of earth's gravity. The fact that it "feels" weightless gradually doesn't change the fact tha
773.
by vrighter 1y ago
by "parse" I usually assume I get out some sort of AST I can walk and manipulate. LLMs do no such thing. There is no parsing going on.
774.
by vrighter 1y ago
but we don't have llms that can "produce everything in c++". We have LLMs that can get some boilerplate right if you use it in a greenfield project, and will repeatedly mess up your code once it grows enough for you to actual
775.
by vrighter 1y ago
and even those confidence ratings are useless, imo. If trained with wrong data, it will report high confidence for the wrong answer. And curating a dataset is a black art in the first place
776.
by vrighter 1y ago
I've had to do just that to retrofit features I wasn't allowed to think about up front (we must get the product out the door.... we'll cross that bridge when we get to it)
777.
by vrighter 1y ago
make the index a linked data structure. You can then extend it whenever, wherever
778.
by vrighter 1y ago
the one with the cryptocurrency bullshit?
779.
by vrighter 1y ago
the sqlite database engine runs in-process. Whatever language you embed it in, is the "native" compute language for it.
780.
by vrighter 1y ago
by "it's common in the .Net world" I mean that it seems to be an antipattern that's blindly followed. If there's only ever one implementation, it is the interface, imo

More ›