Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
vrighter
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
vrighter
15d ago
Why do I have to pay to pay? For any transaction size? I'm already taxed for earning the money. I'm already taxed on goods I spend it on. And now I need to be taxed again every time I want to be taxed again on already taxed money?
32.
▲
by
vrighter
15d ago
I heard that unsafe rust is then unsafer than c++. I haven't learned rust yet, and I get that it's a tradeoff because the rest of the system can still be relied on. But how true is that first statement?
33.
▲
by
vrighter
16d ago
a caveat worth mentioning:
34.
▲
by
vrighter
16d ago
This made me laugh out loud. And got my office coworkers to give me a strange look. Thank you
35.
▲
by
vrighter
16d ago
or gulfs. Or states
36.
▲
by
vrighter
16d ago
handing over all of their data to the five eyes... because they have your private keys (or for the "trustless" version, have you generate ephemeral keys on your own server... and then send it to them)
37.
▲
by
vrighter
17d ago
Yes it is obviously impossible, as anyone familiar with the subject could (and did) say. You can't detect something that is so dilute that there isn't even a single molecule of it in a single drop of blood drawn from a capillary.
38.
▲
by
vrighter
17d ago
yes, it's easier to build something that doesn't work. More news at 11.
39.
▲
by
vrighter
17d ago
It used to just be satirical. Now it's quasi-satirical. Reality has caught up to the satire, unfortunately.
40.
▲
by
vrighter
18d ago
having worked heavily on backup software, ho are vm backups supposed to work now?
41.
▲
by
vrighter
19d ago
Neither is there a ground truth in rock paper scissors (the pattern varies by the player). But one would still be trying to detect patterns and predict the next "token" the opponent is going to output.
42.
▲
by
vrighter
22d ago
the thing that allowed me to effectively climb higher in the abstraction stack, is to dive lower first.
43.
▲
by
vrighter
23d ago
the release date is decided before the work even starts. Whatever's done gets released, and marketing gets to claim a new major version. When it's still a work in progress. All software works like this nowadays (I'm sure it d
44.
▲
by
vrighter
23d ago
"going beta" is a human decision. It proves nothing. All it proves is that at some point someone looked at it and said "good enough, ship it". It says nothing about the quality of the unreviewed code.
45.
▲
by
vrighter
25d ago
"yo we heard you like camera bumps so we put camera bumps on your camera bumps so you can camera bump while you camera bump" I wouldn't say they're an exact copy...
46.
▲
by
vrighter
25d ago
this is backwards. Go on.... try it anywhere. Just the start menu (if you're on windows) is enough.
47.
▲
by
vrighter
25d ago
I don't trust AI testing. An automated loop == zero testing in my book.
48.
▲
by
vrighter
25d ago
large scale is cheaper more economical anywhere else. I don't believe making reactors smaller would work differently than anything else.
49.
▲
by
vrighter
25d ago
Why would I trust my data to a vibe coded database, over a battle tested, tested to hell and back one?
50.
▲
by
vrighter
26d ago
oh for fuck's sake.... again???
51.
▲
by
vrighter
26d ago
when I designed my own simple risc-v processor with just rv32i, i just compiled lua. Hassle free
52.
▲
by
vrighter
29d ago
Flatpak: adjust permissions here, workaround there, different workaround for a different DE. My solution: I'm very careful about what I run, but when I do run it, I just do. No fanfare. No security theater.
53.
▲
by
vrighter
29d ago
As far as I'm concerned, GLM is the opengl mathematics library. I wish projects would check before stealing a name.
54.
▲
by
vrighter
1mo ago
I don't think "rolling out smaller package sizes at lower price points." is rolling anything back, shrinkflation-wise
55.
▲
by
vrighter
1mo ago
the skill of being cognitively lazy
56.
▲
by
vrighter
1mo ago
can you turn off your microphone, fellow colleague-in-the-same-room? I can hear myself through it!
57.
▲
by
vrighter
1mo ago
And one implementation that everyone settled on, and pretty much everyone can assume to be present is worse than multiple incompatible implementations how?
58.
▲
by
vrighter
1mo ago
Why? What is it with this obsession with fixed release cadences? Releasing half baked stuff just because an arbitrary self-imposed deadline is close?
59.
▲
by
vrighter
1mo ago
"they are difficult to open in case of power failure" "We'll just open the windows automatically using the same power that was lost"
60.
▲
by
vrighter
1mo ago
they'd just be too small to make sense of other models' outputs
More ›