voidspark

9 ms·

91.
by voidspark 1y ago
> Progress of technology should not be artitrarily held back to protect automateable jobs though. We need to adapt. So you don't mind if your economic value drops to zero, with all human labour replaced by machines? Dependent on UBI
92.
by voidspark 1y ago
The latest models are natively multimodal. Gemini, GPT-4o, Llama 4. Same model trained on audio, video, images, text - not separate specialized components stitched together.
93.
by voidspark 1y ago
ChatGPT can write a working Python script to generate the Json. It can call a library to do that.
94.
by voidspark 1y ago
That's an important distinction. A machine could be super intelligent at solving real world practical tasks, better than any human, without being conscious. We don't have a proper definition of consciousness. Consciousness is infi
95.
by voidspark 1y ago
That's right, and the Wikipedia page refers to the classification system: "A framework for classifying AGI by performance and autonomy was proposed in 2023 by Google DeepMind researchers. They define five performance levels of AGI
96.
by voidspark 1y ago
> Sure, Google wants to redefine AGI It is not a redefinition. It's a classification for AGI systems. It's a refinement. Other researchers are also trying to classify AGI systems. It's not just Google. Also, there is no un
97.
by voidspark 1y ago
Nothing to do with moving the goalposts. This is current research. The classification of AGI systems is currently being debated by AI researchers. It's a classification system for AGI, not a redefinition. It's a refinement. Also t
98.
by voidspark 1y ago
Then you are simply rejecting any attempts to refine the definition of AGI. I already linked to the Google DeepMind paper. The definition is being debated in the AI research community. I already explained that definition is too limited beca
99.
by voidspark 1y ago
> Gluten-free means free of gluten. Bad analogy. That's a binary classification. AGI systems can have degrees of performance and capability. > Humans are not. LLMs are. My point is that if you oversimplify LLMs to "word auto
100.
by voidspark 1y ago
Technically it is a refinement, as it distinguishes levels of performance. The General Intelligence part of AGI refers to its ability to solve problems that it was not explicitly trained to solve, across many problem domains. We already h
101.
by voidspark 1y ago
It's not a redefinition, it's a refinement. Think about it - the original definition of AGI was basically a machine that can do absolutely anything at a human level of intelligence or better. That kind of technology wouldn't
102.
by voidspark 1y ago
> AGI would mean something which doesn't need direction or guidance to do anything There can be levels of AGI. Google DeepMind have proposed a framework that would classify ChatGPT as "Emerging AGI". ChatGPT can solve prob
103.
by voidspark 1y ago
Their multimodal models are a rudimentary form of AGI. EDIT: There can be levels of AGI. Google DeepMind have proposed a framework that would classify ChatGPT as "Emerging AGI". https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.0246
104.
by voidspark 1y ago
I have read his story many years ago. He also designed the Z80. The point is, if he arrived in Bangladesh instead of California, he would have accomplished nothing notable.
105.
by voidspark 1y ago
The integrated circuit was invented in Texas and Silicon Valley, California.
106.
by voidspark 1y ago
I’m not wrong. It’s called Silicon Valley for a reason Since the DoE was established, education has only declined versus the rest of the world. America spends more money for less.
107.
by voidspark 1y ago
It can analyze a crash dump in 2 seconds, that could take hours for an experienced developer, or impossible for the "average human".
108.
by voidspark 1y ago
You are missing the point. Code is not modelled mathematically, it is defined mathematically. It exists as an abstraction which is fully defined by operational semantics and denotational semantics, not modelled or approximated. In the c
109.
by voidspark 1y ago
> but there no reality in mathematics, only fantasy, so you can't understand this with mathematics alone No. Code is an abstraction. It exists as a logical structure, grounded in mathematical logic. https://news.ycombinat
110.
by voidspark 1y ago
> word problems That is a good analogy, except programming languages are formal languages, not natural languages. > they are readily mapped to mathematical models With code we are not talking about something that is mapped to mathemat
111.
by voidspark 1y ago
Right, that's the $9500 Mac Studio with 512GB RAM and 80-core GPU. 16x the RAM of RTX 5090. There are two versions of the M3 Ultra 28-core CPU, 60-core GPU 32-core CPU, 80-core GPU Both have a 32-core Neural Engine.
112.
by voidspark 1y ago
> The discussion started about whether human needs math skills to write code. Writing code IS a math skill. When writing code you are writing logic in a formal system. Logic is mathematics. You may be thinking that mathematics is just li
113.
by voidspark 1y ago
xAI is a separate company. https://x.ai/colossus
114.
by voidspark 1y ago
$4k will get you a 96 GB Mac Studio with M3 Ultra (819 GB/sec). That's 3x the RAM of the 5090.
115.
by voidspark 1y ago
Yeah that's probably wrong. But the M3 Ultra is good enough for local inferencing, in any case.
116.
by voidspark 1y ago
Now you’re talking about the human activity of writing code, not the code itself. Those business requirements are inputs to the process of writing the code. Once the code is actually written, that exists as a formal logical system, defined
117.
by voidspark 1y ago
Not for inferencing. M3 Ultra runs big LLMs twice as fast as RTX 5090. https://creativestrategies.com/mac-studio-m3-ultra-ai-workst... RTX 5090 only has 32GB RAM. M3 Ultra has up to 512 GB with 819 GB/sec bandwidth. It
118.
by voidspark 1y ago
M3 Ultra has a big GPU with 819 GB/sec bandwidth. LLM performance is twice as fast as RTX 5090 https://creativestrategies.com/mac-studio-m3-ultra-ai-workst...
119.
by voidspark 1y ago
Code is logical in nature and is defined by mathematics.
120.
by voidspark 1y ago
That may be true to some extent, but I think you are missing the point. Quarks are physical in nature, and code is logical in nature. Programs themselves are formal systems. Code isn’t just modelled by mathematics, it is defined by mathemat

More ›