viro

10 ms·

61.
by viro 5y ago
huh? Wanna try again?
62.
by viro 5y ago
You're asking for legal protection that you don't force onto your own court system. Does your court system inform criminals they are being wiretapped during an active investigation?
63.
by viro 5y ago
"Via warrant or subpoena" You want American companies to ignore court orders. This isn't about privacy protections. You want EU data to be immune from court orders.
64.
by viro 5y ago
This is silly, next up CDNs violate GDPR.
65.
by viro 5y ago
Then why was there a mass exodus during the height of WFH? Data seems to show that people pay that premium to reduce commute time. Let's not forget full remote was a lot harder to get before covid.
66.
by viro 5y ago
Umm instead of wasting time here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exce... as you can see a couple of those are laws like CP and "Threatening the president"
67.
by viro 5y ago
Like what? I have a feeling there aren't as many as you think. Most of them are about ordering people to commit literal violence/crimes.
68.
by viro 5y ago
Great, Dark patterns now coming to iOS.
69.
by viro 5y ago
yea.... That's not something to be proud of.
70.
by viro 5y ago
Then why did Facebook lose 10b dollars from losing that tracking data on iOS?
71.
by viro 5y ago
> So, basically, the US security services can hoover up data about EU citizens, and those EU citizens aren't allowed any legal redress about it. Which, unsurprisingly, they aren't okay with. Nothing about this stops that. Like
72.
by viro 5y ago
Why should every US tech company be expected to duplicate its infrastructure in the EU? Google isn't special, this applies to EVERY US-based competitor to GA. This gives EU competitors an unfair advantage.... and that's the real p
73.
by viro 5y ago
It also probably didn't help that I was doing on prim VMWare which wasn't a super common use case at the time.
74.
by viro 5y ago
nope, it's that the legal entity is required to honor US warrants. EU wants full control over that process.
75.
by viro 5y ago
That's why this whole thing is nothing but protectionism.
76.
by viro 5y ago
That's not the problem here at all tho.
77.
by viro 5y ago
source? Since conventional wisdom disagrees with you.
78.
by viro 5y ago
old? It happened last week for me.
79.
by viro 5y ago
man, terraform errors are VERY vague. at least when I was using it.
80.
by viro 5y ago
I have a simple one for ya... Use docker and Vmware on the same windows machine.
81.
by viro 5y ago
oh wow he completely misrepresented that stat.
82.
by viro 5y ago
My first guess would be "Open hacker news" requires clear audible speech. While the KB method just requires pressing 'h' and 'enter'. Also, non-cloud speech recognition just recently got decent.
83.
by viro 5y ago
... because it's not a good way to control a computer?
84.
by viro 5y ago
Why Amazon and not the people committing the fraud? I don't know why so many people think private companies should be doing the job of the government. Unless you want Amazon to completely get rid of 3rd party sellers.
85.
by viro 5y ago
So they should force 3rd party sellers to use the "fulfillment by amazon" so they can validate the product?
86.
REvil ransomware gang arrested in Russia(bbc.com)
3 points by viro 5y ago|1 comments
87.
by viro 5y ago
The intent is extremely important to the word malware. the intent WAS malicious.
88.
by viro 5y ago
Are you arguing that most malware should be legal because the user downloaded it and ran it?
89.
by viro 5y ago
malware is malware. You don't have a right to change ur software to malware. "wElL yOu ShOuLd HaVe Tested" no you shouldn't push software in bad faith designed to crash apps that use it.
90.
by viro 5y ago
> There's plenty of people here already that disagree on whether the intent was malicious. No, I haven't seen many people try to argue that the intent wasn't malicious. Most people seem to be arguing that it's fine an

More ›