3 ms·
So they should force 3rd party sellers to use the "fulfillment by amazon" so they can validate the product?
by viro 5y ago
So they should force 3rd party sellers to use the "fulfillment by amazon" so they can validate the product?
- cmatthias 5y agoNo, the sellers of these fraudulent products (at least the first 5 on the search results page the OP linked to in the twitter thread) are already using FBA. Amazon clearly doesn't care. Maybe a prosecutor bringing legal action against Amazon would be the best way to make them care.
- viro 5y agoWhy Amazon and not the people committing the fraud? I don't know why so many people think private companies should be doing the job of the government. Unless you want Amazon to completely get rid of 3rd party sellers.
- cmatthias 5y agoI never said "not the people committing the fraud". Why not both? Amazon is the entity warehousing and shipping the products in the United States (or wherever the buyer happens to be), and is and is the party enabling the fraudulent products to be sold to the buyer. I'm not a lawyer, but I'd have to think there are consumer protection laws being violated here, as well as mail fraud, assuming at least some of these products are shipped via the postal service. I support legal action against the companies selling the products too, but they tend to disappear and reappear under different names, and are likely all located in China, which I assume makes prosecution more difficult. Responding to your edit: this is not "private companies doing the job of the government." If there are fraud and/or consumer protection laws on the books, then companies need to follow them, and they need to face legal consequences when they don't.
- mdni007 5y agoThe real issue is that Amazon is not doing anything about their fake review problem for products that they list on their website. Whether or not that has any legal consequence is up for debate.