vilmosi

55 ms·

451.
by vilmosi 11y ago
>>> The word overweight means to have excess fat, specifically. Dictionary definition "above a weight considered normal or desirable." The WHO definition "a BMI greater than or equal to 25 is overweight" Not sur
452.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Here you go. Clinical study performed at the University of Minnesota on the effects of reduced calorie intake. At least those men did lose weight. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Starvation_Experimen... >&gt
453.
by vilmosi 11y ago
And I gave you links explaining the downsides. A calorie deficit diet does not guarantee fat-loss, it's more likely that your muscles break down before your fat. Your metabolism slows, making it even harder to lose weight, you'll
454.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Yes you do lose weight, I don't disagree. If you do have a weight problem, it might be an option. But I don't think it's not detrimental for you or that it's a viable long term solution.
455.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Fine then, show me. Show me some "science" that show how starving yourself is good for you. Put up or shut up, this isn't productive.
456.
by vilmosi 11y ago
>>> but there is no such thing as smoking in a healthy way But there is a way to be overweight in a healthy. Basically everyone at the gym is overweight (officially anyway) because of their muscle mass. >>> Exercise is gre
457.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Agree to disagree. Starving yourself should never be an option.
458.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Oh I get it now, there's a misconception here. A caloric deficit DIET is detrimental to you. But you can still obtain calorie deficit process by simply increasing the output (i.e. exercise). Eating quality food helps too.
459.
by vilmosi 11y ago
What scientific evidence? Let me guess, some blog post from a company that sells said diet? Give me a break. Starving your body does indeed make you lose weight, that's true. It's just not a healthy way to do it. Nor is it long te
460.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Fair enough, everyone has different goals. Some people really just want to lose fat for the sake of it.
461.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Fine, I concede. The term MacDonalds may be too ingrained in my mind as a synonym to junk food. I should have said "500 calories of sugar-rich junk food will not affect your weight and health in the same way as 500 calories of protein.
462.
by vilmosi 11y ago
How is that No True Scotsman in any way? Seriously?! >> It is a microsecond of thought experiment to find 500 McDonald's calories that are better for you than a specific 500 fresh vegetable calories. Go for it. Take a whole secon
463.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Who cares about overweight? It's about being healthy, but people forgot that. A lot of people from the gym are classified as overweight, with fat or not, but they are healthy as a horse and look good as well. This concern about losing
464.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Calorie deficit is harmful for you though, there's an imbalance. You tell your body it's starving. As soon as you have an extra calorie to spare, you're body will immediately store it as fat, making your hard work essentially
465.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Counting calories is definitely NOT the way to a healthy body. That's all marketing fluff. 500 calories from Macdonalds is not the same as 500 calories of fresh vegetables. And why did you put "quality food" in quotes?! The t
466.
by vilmosi 11y ago
What a load of rubbish. First of all, losing weight is not the goal itself, it's one of the means to the real goal, which is to be healthy. It's not about eating less, it's about eating healthy. Exercise is absolutely essenti
467.
by vilmosi 11y ago
There are many companies that offer just that "status" as well. I don't know why you think Apple is special in any way when it comes to jobs. In fact, I heard they're worse, exactly because of the "status" that
468.
by vilmosi 11y ago
That's not really an answer. Many companies offer just that and more.
469.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Not really, most of their workforce are "geniuses" and the like
470.
by vilmosi 11y ago
So how exactly does iAds work without any data?
471.
by vilmosi 11y ago
As many people with jobs, I too use Microsoft's email. However archiving is less important to me. The only reason I archive is because it's a quick way to "Mark as read" in Google. I don't really care about archivin
472.
by vilmosi 11y ago
I don't understand this "Inbox Zero" stress. How hard is it to set up filters on your email? How hard is it to swipe it away to archive it? How many emails do you have to write a day?!
473.
by vilmosi 11y ago
My experience is the same as yours, except the opposite. I kept hearing how wonderful the Mac software world was, until I had to work on one for work. Everything was a lie and a lot of software was subpar to the Windows equivalent (Github
474.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Surely non of the Mac only tools are non-replaceable, are they??
475.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Quality is how employees are valued in a business. That's how salaries are made. Overpaying in an industry is just a big of a problem as underpayment, it's far from a free market as you think. Point based systems work in many co
476.
by vilmosi 11y ago
The other comments in this thread make an excellent point on how this doesn't make sense (extremely long investment period, unusually high interest, no inflation...). However, my $0.02 is time. If you can afford a daily $5 coffee, the
477.
by vilmosi 11y ago
That theory has been debunked long ago. It just isn't true.
478.
by vilmosi 11y ago
>>> every website should have 'text only' version which can be opened in CLI browser like Links. every website has a target audience and it simply doesn't make sense to spend time and effort for this support. It&#x2
479.
by vilmosi 11y ago
If quality is your concern, shouldn't you propose a point based system instead?
480.
by vilmosi 11y ago
Is this supposed to be the new Dreamweaver? Because that one was obviously the future /s

More ›