vexxed-concave

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by vexxed-concave 5y ago

   True. It’s one of only a handful of YT videos I’ve ever left a comment on. In summary, just because something is “wrong” at one scale doesn’t invalidate useful models and workaday theorems at another. Also, for such a pedantic video his f
2. 2.▲
   by vexxed-concave 5y ago

   Please review the stated history of events—-it IS extremely unlikely. She is making a case in the court of public opinion. Granted she has more clout than the “average joe” (and the very fact that this is even being discussed is evidence fo
3. 3.▲
   by vexxed-concave 5y ago

   Yes. Given the timing of things (why even make this public?), the low likelihood of the event, and crucially the lack of any evidence, I see the preponderance of the probabilities weighing against her claims.
4. 4.▲
   by vexxed-concave 5y ago

   This feels way too coincident with her recent book release. Given her already public figure persona and proceeds from prior works, why EVER take the risk to ship such personal hardware to a 3rd party?!! Just get a new phone and sync a back-
5. 5.▲
   by vexxed-concave 5y ago

   “Space Force” has been around for decades. See the “National Reconnaissance Office” https://www.nro.gov/